Home Time from symptom onset influences high-sensitivity troponin T diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Time from symptom onset influences high-sensitivity troponin T diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction

  • Li Guangquan , Huang Hualan , Nie Xin , He Yong , Song Haolan , Luo Tongxing , Gao Baoxiu , Nie Hu EMAIL logo and Li Guixing EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 27, 2015

Abstract

Background: The time required for patients with acute chest pain to reach a hospital emergency department varies, possibly lowering the diagnostic performance of a general cut-off value for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to determine the cut-off values as calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of hs-cTnT at different times from onset of symptoms to admission, and to evaluate their diagnostic performance.

Methods: Our study included 3096 patients with symptoms suggestive of AMI. These patients were classified according to time from onset of symptoms to admission. The diagnostic accuracy was quantified by the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

Results: Of the patients, 1082 (49.3%) were diagnosed as having AMI (317 were non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]). The AUC for hs-cTnT to diagnose AMI was 0.881 at <3 h after symptom onset, 0.940 at 3–6 h after symptom onset, 0.966 at 6–12 h after symptom onset, and 0.974 at >12 h after symptom onset. The threshold as determined by ROC of hs-cTnT was 13.5 ng/L to diagnose AMI at ≤3 h after symptom onset with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 80.1%, 17.8 ng/L at 3–6 h after symptom onset with a sensitivity of 94.6% and a specificity of 84.3%, 30.0 ng/L at 6–12 h after symptom onset with a sensitivity of 95.9% and a specificity of 85.5%, and 58.0 ng/L at >12 h after symptom onset with a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 93.3%. The same observations were performed for the diagnosis of NSTEMI.

Conclusions: The ROC-determined cut-off value of hs-cTnT for AMI or NSTEMI diagnosis gradually increased with time from onset of symptoms to presentation. Using a higher cut-off value by ROC for hs-cTnT will improve its accuracy in diagnosing AMI or NSTEMI patients in late presenters. The higher value will enable physicians to more quickly rule in patients compared to the 99th percentile cut-off, and can rule out patients safely.


Corresponding authors: Nie Hu, Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China, Phone/Fax: +86 028 85423709, E-mail: ; and Li Guixing, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China, Phone/Fax: +86 028 85422615, E-mail:
aLi Guangquan and Huang Hualan contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the patients who participated in this study, and to the ED staff as well as the laboratory technicians for their most valuable efforts. This study was supported by Roche Diagnostics GmbH in Shanghai (H1311115).

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1163–70.10.1056/NEJM200004203421603Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Tiemann O. Variations in hospitalisation costs for acute myocardial infarction – a comparison across Europe. Health Econ 2008;17:S33–45.10.1002/hec.1322Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Forberg JL, Henriksen LS, Edenbrandt L, Ekelund U. Direct hospital costs of chest pain patients attending the emergency department: a retrospective study. BMC Emerg Med 2006;6:6.10.1186/1471-227X-6-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Apple FS, Smith SW, Pearce LA, Ler R, Murakami MM. Use of the Centaur TnI-Ultra assay for detection of myocardial infarction and adverse events in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chem 2008;54:723–8.10.1373/clinchem.2007.097162Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, Tzikas S, Roth A, Czyz E, et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2009;361:868–77.10.1056/NEJMoa0903515Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45.10.2307/2531595Search in Google Scholar

7. Wildi K, Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Mader F, Zellweger C, Moehring B, et al. Serial changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:4103–10.10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.078Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Keller T, Zeller T, Ojeda F, Tzikas S, Lillpopp L, Sinning C, et al. Serial changes in highly sensitive troponin I assay and early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc 2011;306:2684–93.10.1001/jama.2011.1896Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Razzouk L, Fusaro M, Esquitin R. Novel biomarkers for risk stratification and identification of life-threatening cardiovascular disease: troponin and beyond. Curr Cardiol Rev 2012;8:109–15.10.2174/157340312801784943Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Aldous SJ, Richards M, Cullen L, Troughton R, Than M. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of early measurement with high-sensitivity troponin T assay in patients presenting with chest pain. Can Med Assoc J 2012;184:E260–8.10.1503/cmaj.110773Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Aldous S, Pemberton C, Richards AM, Troughton R, Than M. High-sensitivity troponin T for early rule-out of myocardial infarction in recent onset chest pain. Emerg Med J 2012;29:805–10.10.1136/emermed-2011-200222Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461–70.10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. White H. Avatar of the universal definition of periprocedural myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1571–4.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.721Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Muller-Bardorff M, Hallermayer K, Schroder A, Ebert C, Borgya A, Gerhardt W, et al. Improved troponin T ELISA specific for cardiac troponin T isoform: assay development and analytical and clinical validation. Clin Chem 1997;43:458–66.10.1093/clinchem/43.3.458Search in Google Scholar

15. Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K, Jarausch J, Jaffe AS, Katus HA. Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2010;56:254–61.10.1373/clinchem.2009.132654Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Mueller C, Laule-Kilian K, Schindler C, Klima T, Frana B, Rodriguez D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of B-type natriuretic peptide testing in patients with acute dyspnea. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1081–7.10.1001/archinte.166.10.1081Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Eggers KM, Lind L, Ahlstrom H, Bjerner T, Ebeling BC, Larsson A, et al. Prevalence and pathophysiological mechanisms of elevated cardiac troponin I levels in a population-based sample of elderly subjects. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2252–8.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn327Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Meune C, Balmelli C, Vogler E, Twerenbold R, Reiter M, Reichlin T, et al. Consideration of high-sensitivity troponin values below the 99th percentile at presentation: does it improve diagnostic accuracy? Int J Cardiol 2013;168:3752–7.10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, Twerenbold R, Reiter M, Zellweger C, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1211–8.10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3698Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Meune C, Balmelli C, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T, Reiter M, Haaf P, et al. Patients with acute coronary syndrome and normal high-sensitivity troponin. Am J Med 2011;124:1151–7.10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Tsutamoto T, Kawahara C, Yamaji M, Nishiyama K, Fujii M, Yamamoto T, et al. Relationship between renal function and serum cardiac troponin T in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:653–8.10.1093/eurjhf/hfp072Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Chen S, Huang C, Wu B, Lian X, Mei X, Wan J. Cardiac troponin I in non- acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease. PLoS One 2013;8:e82752.10.1371/journal.pone.0082752Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Mueller M, Celik S, Biener M, Vafaie M, Schwoebel K, Wollert KC, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic performance of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay compared to a contemporary sensitive cardiac troponin I assay in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clin Res Cardiol 2012;101:837–45.10.1007/s00392-012-0469-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Lotze U, Lemm H, Heyer A, Muller K. Combined determination of highly sensitive troponin T and copeptin for early exclusion of acute myocardial infarction: first experience in an emergency department of a general hospital. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011;7:509–15.10.2147/VHRM.S21753Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, Diercks D, Farkouh ME, Garvey JL, et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:1756–76.10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181ec61dfSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Dehghan A, Leening MJ, Solouki AM, Boersma E, Deckers JW, van Herpen G, et al. Comparison of prognosis in unrecognized versus recognized myocardial infarction in men versus women >55 years of age (from the Rotterdam Study). Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1–6.10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020–35.10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, Steuer S, Stelzig C, Hartwiger S, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 2009;361:858–67.10.1056/NEJMoa0900428Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Giannitsis E, Becker M, Kurz K, Hess G, Zdunek D, Katus HA. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T for early prediction of evolving non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and negative troponin results on admission. Clin Chem 2010;56:642–50.10.1373/clinchem.2009.134460Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-7-29
Accepted: 2015-6-1
Published Online: 2015-6-27
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Building a bridge to safe diagnosis in health care. The role of the clinical laboratory
  4. Capillary electrophoresis for the screening and diagnosis of inherited hemoglobin disorders. Ready for prime time?
  5. Reviews
  6. Hyperuricemia as risk factor for coronary heart disease incidence and mortality in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. Towards biomarker-based tests that can facilitate decisions about prevention and management of preeclampsia in low-resource settings
  8. Mini Review
  9. Clinical relevance of sST2 in cardiac diseases
  10. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  11. Preservation of urine free catecholamines and their free O-methylated metabolites with citric acid as an alternative to hydrochloric acid for LC-MS/MS-based analyses
  12. Performance characteristics of the VIDAS® 25-OH Vitamin D Total assay – comparison with four immunoassays and two liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods in a multicentric study
  13. Differentiation of acute pyelonephritis from other febrile states in children using urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL)
  14. Early postoperative C-terminal agrin fragment (CAF) serum levels predict graft loss and proteinuria in renal transplant recipients
  15. Homocitrulline: a new marker for differentiating acute from chronic renal failure
  16. Hematology and Coagulation
  17. Development of hemoglobin typing control materials for laboratory investigation of thalassemia and hemoglobinopathies
  18. Comparison of capillary electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography for detection and quantification of hemoglobin New York
  19. Prevalence of hemostatic alterations in patients with recurrent spontaneous subconjunctival hemorrhage
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Reference intervals for 24 laboratory parameters determined in 24-hour urine collections
  22. First trimester PAPP-A2, PAPP-A and hCGβ in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. Clinical utility of one versus two faecal immunochemical test samples in the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients
  25. Cardiovascular Diseases
  26. Time from symptom onset influences high-sensitivity troponin T diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction
  27. Prognostic significance of serum albumin level changes in acute ischemic stroke: the role of biological and analytical variation
  28. Correlates of serum hepcidin levels and its association with cardiovascular disease in an elderly general population
  29. Infectious Diseases
  30. Usefulness of several biomarkers in the management of septic patients: C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, presepsin and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin
  31. Diabetes
  32. Performance of strip-based glucose meters and cassette-based blood gas analyzer for monitoring glucose levels in a surgical intensive care setting
  33. Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system
  34. Acknowledgment
  35. Acknowledgment
  36. Letter to the Editors
  37. Glypican-1 as a highly sensitive and specific pancreatic cancer biomarker
  38. Platelet microRNAs are not modulated by systemic heparin in acute coronary syndromes
  39. Concomitant appearance of two false positive peaks with a true monoclonal one in a patient with plasma cell myeloma
  40. Anti-streptavidin interferences in Roche thyroid immunoassays: a case report
  41. Evaluation of the new Methotrexate CMIA assay on the Architect i2000SR
  42. Liposomal interference on Sysmex XN-series body fluid mode
  43. Development of an immunomagnetic beads-based test and its application in influenza surveillance
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0776/html
Scroll to top button