Home The Compatible and the Comparable – Searching for Doctrinal Sharedness between Kamalaśīla and Northern Chan
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Compatible and the Comparable – Searching for Doctrinal Sharedness between Kamalaśīla and Northern Chan

Published/Copyright: June 9, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Samyé debate (792–794) between the Chinese Chan monk Moheyan and his Indo-Tibetan opponents has long been one of the key issues in the study of Indo-Tibetan Buddhism. This article attempts to approach this debate from a different angle, by focussing on the common ground that enabled the debate in the first place, instead of the doctrinal opposition between the two parties. This article argues that there are several areas where Kamalaśīla’s doctrinal positions are comparable to or even compatible with the doctrinal positions found in Northern Chan texts. First, the article points to the centrality of the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra and how it signifies their commitment to a form of Yogācāra-Madhyamaka synthesis. Second, the controversy revolving around the “Single Vehicle” (Ekayāna) is discussed. Third, the article discusses how to understand the “interface” between Yogācāra and Madhyamaka in Kamalaśīla’s texts and Northern Chan texts. Lastly, the article compares yogic perception discussed by Kamalaśīla and the extrasensory apprehension alluded to in Northern Chan texts.


Corresponding author: Yi Ding, DePaul University – Religious Studies, 2333 N. Racine Ave, Chicago, IL 94305, USA, E-mail:
I thank Paul Harrison, Robert Sharf, Birgit Kellner, and Chiou Pei-Lin for reading my draft and providing many suggestions and corrections. Any errors are mine alone. All translations are my own unless otherwise noted, and I convert Chinese characters in quoted texts from Wade-Giles to Pinyin when possible.

References

Arnold, Dan (2020): “Should Mādhyamikas Refute Subjectivity? Thoughts on What Might Be at Stake in Debates on Self-Awareness”. Buddhist Philosophy of Consciousness. Edited by Mark Siderits, Ching Keng, and John Spackman. Leiden: Brill, 154–188.10.1163/9789004440913_009Search in Google Scholar

Bingenheimer, Marcus / Zhang, Boyong 張伯雍 (eds.) (2018): Zaoqi chanzong wenxian sibu: 2 早期禪宗文獻四部 2. Taipei: Xinwenfeng.Search in Google Scholar

Biondo, Serena (2021): “Narrative Sources of the Great Debate.” In Bringing Buddhism to Tibet: History and Narrative in the Dba’ bzhed Manuscript. Edited by Lewis Doney, Berlin: De Gruyter, 75–87.10.1515/9783110715309-005Search in Google Scholar

Bretfeld, Sven (2004): “The ‘Great Debate’ of bSam yas: Construction and Deconstruction of a Tibetan Buddhist Myth.” Asiatische Studien 58/1: 15–56.Search in Google Scholar

Demiéville, Paul (1987): Le concile de Lhasa: une controverse sur le quiétisme entre bouddhistes de l’Inde et de la Chine au VIIIe siècle de l’ère chrétienne. 1952. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale de France.Search in Google Scholar

Ding, Yi (Forthcoming): “Antipathy, Ambivalence, Acceptance: Chan Attitudes toward Ritual from the Eighth to the Eleventh Century.” History of Religions.Search in Google Scholar

Ding, Yi (2022): “Telling Infelicities and Hidden Intelligibility: The ‘Interlingual Questions’ from the ‘Samyé Debate’ in Tibet (792–794)”. BuddhistRoad Paper 1/4: 3–47.10.46586/rub.br.203.178Search in Google Scholar

Doney, Lewis (ed.) (2021): Bringing Buddhism to Tibet: History and Narrative in the Dba’ bzhed Manuscript. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110715309Search in Google Scholar

Dong, Hao 董浩, et al.. (eds.) (1983): Quan Tangwen 全唐文. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Search in Google Scholar

Faure, Bernard (1997): The Will to Orthodoxy: A Critical Genealogy of Northern Chan Buddhism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Funayama, Tōru (2011): “Kamalaśīla’s View on Yogic Perception and the Bodhisattva Path”. In: Religion and Logic in Buddhist Philosophical Analysis: Proceedings of the Fourth International Dharmakīrti Conference. Vienna, August 23–27, 2005. Edited by Helmut Krasser, Horst Lasic, Eli Franco and Birgit Kellner. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 99–111.Search in Google Scholar

Funayama, Tōru (2014): “Chinese Translations of Pratyakṣa”. In: A Distant Mirror: Articulating Indic Ideas in Sixth and Seventh Century Chinese Buddhism. Edited by Chen-kuo Lin and Michael Radich. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 33–61.Search in Google Scholar

Garfield, Jay L. (2006): “The Conventional Status of Reflexive Awareness: What’s at Stake in a Tibetan Debate?” Philosophy East and West 56/2: 201–228.10.1353/pew.2006.0020Search in Google Scholar

Gimello, Robert M. (1976): “Apophatic and kataphatic discourse in Mahāyāna: A Chinese view.” Philosophy East and West 26.2: 117–136.10.2307/1398185Search in Google Scholar

Goshima, Kiyotaka (1983): The Tibetan Text of the Second Bhāvanākrama. n.p.Search in Google Scholar

Gómez, Luis O. (1983): “The Direct and the Gradual Approaches of Zen Master Mahāyāna: Fragments of the Teachings of Mo-ho-yen”. In: Studies in Ch’an and Hua-yen. Edited by Robert M. Gimello and Peter N. Gregory. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 69–168.10.1515/9780824840518-004Search in Google Scholar

Han, Chuanqiang 韓傳強 (2017): “Dunhuang xieben Yuanming lun lujiao yu yanjiu” 敦煌寫本《圓明論》錄校與研究. Dunhuang yanjiu 敦煌研究 2017.6: 86–99.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Chuanqiang 韓傳強 (2018): “Dunhuang xieben Daofan qusheng xinjue lujiao yu yanjiu” 敦煌寫本《導凡趣聖心決》錄校與研究. Dunhuang yanjiu 敦煌研究 2018.5: 71–76.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Paul (2010): “Resetting the Diamond: Reflections on Kumārajīva’s Chinese Translation of the Vajracchedikā (‘Diamond Sūtra’).” Journal of Historical and Philological Studies of China’s Western Regions 3: 233–248.Search in Google Scholar

Herrmann-Pfandt, Adelheid (2008): Die lHan kar ma: ein früher Katalog der ins Tibetische übersetzten buddhistischen Texte. Wien: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.10.1553/0x0018c1acSearch in Google Scholar

Ibuki, Atsushi 伊吹敦 (2017): “Ryōga shijiki to batta sanzō anjin hō: sono nihon e no shōrai to tendaishū e no eikyō” 『楞伽師資記』と『跋陀三藏安心法』: その日本への将来と天台宗への影響. Tōyō shisō bunka 東洋思想文化 4: 67–91.Search in Google Scholar

Ichigō, Masamichi (1985): Madhyamakālaṃkāra of Śāntarakṣita with His Own Vṛtti and with the Subcommentary or Pañjikā of Kamalaśīla. Kyoto: Kyoto Sangyo University.Search in Google Scholar

Ichigō, Masamichi (2005) “A Critically Edited Text of the Pūrva-pakṣas of the Madhyamakāloka of Kamalaśīla”. Shin Buddhist Comprehensive Research Institute Annual Memoirs 22: 75–141.10.1558/bsrv.v22i2.14029Search in Google Scholar

Ino, Masafumi 井野雅文 (2019): “Chūgan kōmyōron niokeru ichijō shisō to nyoraizō shisō” 『中観光明論』における一乗思想と如来蔵思想. Indo tetsugaku bukkyōgaku kenkyū インド哲学仏教学研究 27: 71–84.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Christopher V. (2021): The Buddhist Self: On Tathāgatagarbha and Ātman. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.10.1515/9780824886493Search in Google Scholar

Karmay, Samten Gyaltsen (2007): The Great Perfection (rDzogs chen): A Philosophical and Meditative Teaching of Tibetan Buddhism (Second Edition). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004151420.i-278Search in Google Scholar

Keira, Ryūsei (2004): Mādhyamika and Epistemology: A Study of Kamalaśīla’s Method for Proving the Voidness of All Dharmas. Introduction, Annotated Translations and Tibetan Texts of Selected Sections of the Second Chapter of the Madhyamakāloka. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.Search in Google Scholar

Keira, Ryūsei 計良龍成 (2019): “Chūgan kōmyō ron (Madhyamakāloka) ga yinyō suru nyūryōga kyō X 256–258 ni tsuite” 『中観光明論』(Madhyamakāloka) が引用する 『入楞伽経』X 256–258 について. Acta Tibetica et Buddhica 12: 1–33.Search in Google Scholar

Kellner, Birgit (2020): “Using Concepts to Eliminate Conceptualization: Kamalaśīla on Non-Conceptual Gnosis (nirvikalpajñāna).” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 43: 39–80.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Shirō 松本史郎 (1982): “Madhyamakāloka no ichijō shisō: ichijō shisō no kenkyū (I)” Madhyamakāloka の一乗思想: 一乗思想の研究(I). Sōtōshū kenkyūin kenkyūsei kenkyū kiyō 曹洞宗研究員研究生研究紀要 14: 1–47.Search in Google Scholar

Marks, James and Vincent Eltschinger (2019): “Kamalaśīla.” In Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism: Volume II, Lives. Edited by Vincent Eltschinger, Richard Bowring, and Michael Radich. Leiden: Brill, 272–278.Search in Google Scholar

Mipham, Rinpoche (1992): dBu ma rgyan rtsa ’grel. Chengdu: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang.Search in Google Scholar

McRae, John R. (1986): The Northern School and the Formation of Early Ch’an Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.10.1515/9780824887452Search in Google Scholar

McClintock, Sara (2000): “Knowing All through Knowing One: Mystical Communion or Logical Trick in the Tattvasaṃgraha and Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā”. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 23/2: 225–44.Search in Google Scholar

Nupchen (1974): sGom gyi gnang gsal bar phye ba bsam gtan mig sgron. Leh: Smartsis shesrig spendzod.Search in Google Scholar

Nanjio, Bunyiu (1923). The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra. Kyoto: Otani University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Śāstrī, Dwārikādās (ed.) (1968): Tattvasṅgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the Commentary ‘Pañjikā’ of Śrī Kamalaśīla. Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.Search in Google Scholar

Saccone, Margherita S. 2018: On the Nature of Things: A Buddhist Debate on Cognitions and Their Object. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.Search in Google Scholar

Seyfort Ruegg, David (1989a). “On the Tibetan Historiography and Doxography of the ‘Great Debate of Samyé’”. In: Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of International Association of Tibetan Studies: Volume 1. Edited by Shōren Ihara and Zuihō Yamaguchi. Narita: Naritasan Shinshoji. 237–244.Search in Google Scholar

Seyfort Ruegg, David (1989b): Buddha-nature, Mind and the Problem of Gradualism in a Comparative Perspective: On the Transmission and Reception of Buddhism in India and Tibet. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Sharf, Robert H. (2014a): “Mindfulness and Mindlessness in Early Chan”. Philosophy East and West 64/4: 933–64.10.1353/pew.2014.0074Search in Google Scholar

Sharf, Robert H. (2014b): “Is Nirvāna the same as insentience? Chinese struggles with an Indian Buddhist ideal”. In: India in the Chinese Imagination: Myth, Religion, and Thought. Edited by John Kieschnick and Meir Shahar. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 141–170.10.9783/9780812208924.141Search in Google Scholar

Sharf, Robert H. (2021): “The Looping Structure of Buddhist Thought (Or, How Chan Buddhism Resolves the Quantum Measurement Problem)”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 89/3: 1039–1073.10.1093/jaarel/lfab029Search in Google Scholar

Siderits, Mark (2011): “Buddhas as Zombies: A Buddhist Reduction of Subjectivity”. In: Self, No Self? Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, & Indian Traditions. Edited by Mark Siderits, Evan Thompson, and Dan Zahavi. New York: Oxford University Press, 308–331.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Weirong. (2021): “An Invented Tradition: Hva shang Mahāyāna and His Teachings in Tibetan Literature”. In: Sino-Tibetan: Buddhism across the Ages. Edited by Ester Bianchi and Weirong Shen. Leiden: Brill, 27–66.10.1163/9789004468375_003Search in Google Scholar

Sørenson, Henrik H. (2012): “The History and Practice of Early Chan”. In: Readings of the Platform Sutra. Edited by Morten Schlütter and Stephen F. Teiser. New York: Columbia University Press. 53–76.Search in Google Scholar

Tillemans, Tom (2016): “Yogic Perception, Meditation, and Enlightenment: The Epistemological Issues in a Key Debate between Madhyamaka and Chan”. In: How Do Mādhyamikas Think? And Other Essays on the Buddhist Philosophy of the Middle. Edited by Tom Tillemans. Somerville, MA: Wisdom, 179–198.Search in Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe (1958): Minor Buddhist Texts, Part II: First Bhāvanākrama of Kamalaśīla. Rome: Istituto italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.Search in Google Scholar

Tucci, Giuseppe (1971): Minor Buddhist Texts: Part III: Third Bhāvanākrama. Roma: Istituto italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.Search in Google Scholar

Ueyama, Daishun 上山大峻 (1976): “Tibetto yaku tongo shinshū yōketsu” チベット訳「頓悟真宗要決」の研究. Zen bunka kenkyūjo kiyō 禅文化研究所紀要 8: 33–103.Search in Google Scholar

Ueyama, Daishun 上山大峻 (2012) [1990]: Zōho Tonkō Bukkyō no kenkyū 增補敦煌仏教の研究. Kyoto: Hōzōkan.Search in Google Scholar

van Schaik, Sam (2019): The Spirit of Zen. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctv8jnzg7Search in Google Scholar

van Schaik, Sam (2020) “Reconsidering Tibetan Chán”. In: Chán Buddhism in Dūnhuáng and Beyond: A Study of Manuscripts, Texts, and Contexts in Memory of John R. McRae. Edited by Christoph Anderl and Christian Wittern. Leiden: Brill, 194–226.10.1163/9789004439245_006Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Paul (1998): The Reflexive Nature of Awareness: A Tibetan Madhyamaka Defence. London: Curzon.Search in Google Scholar

Yamabe, Nobuyoshi 山部宜能 (2014): “Yogācāra Influence on the Northern School of Chan Buddhism”. In: Fojiao chanxiu yu chuantong: qiyuan yu fazhan 佛教禪修與傳統: 起源與發展. Taipei: Xinwenfeng, 250–314.Search in Google Scholar

Yanagida, Seizan 柳田聖山 (1985): “Goroku no rekishi: Zenbunken no seiritsushiteki kenkyū” 語録の歴史: 禅文献の成立史的研究. Tōhō gakuhō 東方學報 57: 211–663.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-11-08
Accepted: 2023-04-26
Published Online: 2023-06-09
Published in Print: 2023-03-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/asia-2022-0038/html
Scroll to top button