On Concepts and Naps

Works Cited

Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Aspen, nr. 5/6. (1967). Item 3.Search in Google Scholar

Binder, Guyora, and Robert Weisberg. Literary Criticisms of Law. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000.10.1515/9781400823635Search in Google Scholar

Black, Henry Campbell. The Handbook on the Construction and Interpretation of the Laws. 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishers, 1911.10.2307/1104429Search in Google Scholar

Brest, Paul. “The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding.” Interpreting Law and Literature. Ed. Levinson and Mailloux. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1991. 69–96.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Noël. “The Intentional Fallacy: Defending Myself.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997): 305–9.10.2307/431800Search in Google Scholar

Chafee, Zechariah jr. “The disorderly conduct of words.” Columbia Law Review 41 (1941): 381–404.10.2307/1117791Search in Google Scholar

Dickie, George, and W. Kent Wilson. “The Intentional Fallacy: Defending Beardsley.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1995): 233–50.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac53.3.0233Search in Google Scholar

Dorleijn, Gillis J., Ralf Grüttemeier, and Liesbeth Korthals Altes, eds. Authorship Revisited. Conceptions of Authorship around 1900 and 2000. Leuven: Peeters, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Downey, James. “A Fallacy in the Intentional Fallacy.” Philosophy and Literature 31 (2007): 149–52.10.1353/phl.2007.0004Search in Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally. Change, Rhetoric, and the Pratice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke UP, 1989.10.2307/j.ctv11317d7Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, William W. II, Morton J. Horwitz and Thomas A. Reed (eds.). American Legal Realism. New York; Oxford: Oxford UP, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Gaakeer, Jeanne. Hope Springs Eternal. An Introduction to the Work of James Boyd White. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UP, 1998.10.5117/9789053563144Search in Google Scholar

Graff, Gerald. Professing History. An Institutional History, Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2007.10.7208/chicago/9780226305257.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grüttemeier, Ralf. Auteursintentie. Een beknopte geschiedenis. Antwerpen; Apeldoorn: Garant, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Hancher, Michael. “Dead Letters: Wills and Poems.” Interpreting Law and Literature. Ed. Levinson and Mailloux. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1991.101–14.Search in Google Scholar

Hirsch, E.D. jr. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Search in Google Scholar

–. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale UP, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

Iseminger, Gary, ed. Intention and Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Jarman, Thomas. A Treatise on Wills, vol. 3, 8th edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. “The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (2006): 179–206.10.1093/ojls/gqi049Search in Google Scholar

–. “Pepper v Hart and Matters of Constitutional Principle.” Law Quarterly Review 121 (2005): 98–122.Search in Google Scholar

Knapp, Steven, and Walter Benn Michaels. “The Impossibility of Intentionless Meaning.” Intention and Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1992: 51–64.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, and Steven Mailloux (eds.). Interpreting Law and Literature. A Hermeneutic Reader. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

McLoughlin, Kate, and Carl Gardner. “When is authorial intention not authorial intention?” European Journal of English Studies 11 (2007): 93–107.10.1080/13825570601183427Search in Google Scholar

Margrave-Jones, Clive V. The Law of Succession. 5th ed. London: Butterworth, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Michaels, Walter Benn. The shape of the signifier. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

–. “Against Formalism: Chickens and Rocks.” Levinson and Mailloux 215–24.Search in Google Scholar

Nicholls, Donald. “My kingdom for a horse: the meaning of words.” The Law Quarterly Review 121 (2005): 577–91.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, H. Jefferson. “The original understanding of original intent.” Harvard Law Review 98 (1985): 885–948.10.2307/1340880Search in Google Scholar

Radin, Max. “A Short Way with Statutes.” Harvard Law Review 56 (1942): 388–423.10.2307/1334861Search in Google Scholar

–. “Statutory Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 43 (1930): 863–85.10.2307/1330769Search in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Ed. Manfred Frank. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W.K. “Genesis: A Fallacy Revisited.” The Disciplines of Criticism. Essays in Literary Theory, Interpretation, and History. Ed. Peter Demetz, Thomas Greene and Lowry Nelson jr. New Haven: Yale UP, 1968. 193–225.Search in Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W.K. jr., and M.C. Beardsley. “The Intentional Fallacy.” The Sewanee Review 54 (1946): 468–488.Search in Google Scholar