Home Nomogram of the fetal gastric size development in normal pregnancy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Nomogram of the fetal gastric size development in normal pregnancy

  • Kumral Kepkep , Yildiz A. Tuncay , Gökhan Göynümer and Gamze Yetim
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2005

Abstract

Objective To construct an ultrasonographic nomogram of the fetal gastric size with gestational age in normal singleton pregnancy.

Patients and methods Out of 17 000 outpatient pregnant women who were admitted to our hospital, a total of 250 fetal measurements were randomly collected from routine ultrasonographic examinations performed in women with normal singleton pregnancies between 13 and 39 weeks of gestation without medical or obstetric complications. None of the fetuses had detectable fetal malformations. The ultrasound plane which provided the largest stomach area including the pylorus on a transverse and oblique section was used for definition and measurement of gastric longitudinal dimensions. The transverse section at the center of the gastric corpus was used for transverse and anteroposterior dimensions. Biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference were also measured.

Results The fetal gastric longitudinal, anteroposterior and transverse dimensions were significantly correlated with gestational age (r values 0.74, 0.71, and 0.49, respectively). There was a significant correlation measurements between gastric size and AC. The correlation coefficents for gastric dimensions with gestational age was larger than those with AC (r=0.732, 0.702 and 0.489, respectively). The ratio of fetal gastric anteroposterior dimension to fetal AC was a constant parameter calculated as 1/3.

Conclusion Fetal stomach dimensions in normal pregnancy correlate with gestational age and nomogram of fetal gastric development appears to be useful in assessment of normal fetal growth.

:

Corresponding author: Yildız Ayhan Tunçay, MD F Kerim Gökay cad. Ortabahar sok. No: 2/25, Göztepe/Istanbul/Turkey, 34730, Tel.: +90 216 566 48 48 Fax: +90 216 566 82 19,

References

1 Andrassy RJ, GH Mahour: Gastrointestinal anomalies associated with esophageal atresia or tracheoasophageal fistula. Arch Surg114 (1979) 1125Search in Google Scholar

2 Brumfield C, RO Davis, J Owen, K Wenstrom, P Kynerd: Pregnancy outcomes following sonographic nonvisualization of the fetal stomach. Obstet Gynecol91 (1998) 905Search in Google Scholar

3 Goldstein I, AE Reece, S Yarkoni, M Wan, JLJ Gren, J Hobbins: Growth of the fetal stomach in normal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol70 (1987) 641Search in Google Scholar

4 Leopold GR: Antepartum obstetrical guidelines. J Ultrasound Med5 (1986) 24110.7863/jum.1986.5.5.241Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5 McKenna KM, RB Goldstein, MD Stringer: Small or absent fetal stomach: prognotic significance. Radiology197 (1995) 729Search in Google Scholar

6 Medearis AL, JR Shields: Normal fetal and pelvic anatomy. A cross section review. Clin Obstet Gynecol27 (1984) 276Search in Google Scholar

7 Millener BP, GN Anderson, RJ Chisholm: Prognostic significance of nonvisualization of the fetal stomach by sonography. A J R160 (1993) 827Search in Google Scholar

8 Nagata S, T Koyanagi, S Fukishima, K Akazawa, H Nakano: Change in the three-dimensional shape of the stomach in the developing human fetus. Early Hum Dev37 (1994) 27Search in Google Scholar

9 Nagata S, T Koyanagi, N Horimoto, S Satoh, H Nakano: Chronological development of the fetal stomach assessed using real-time ultrasound. Early Hum Dev22 (1990) 15Search in Google Scholar

10 Pekindil G, F Varol, MA Yuce, T Yardim: The fetal stomach circumference/abdominal circumference ratio: a possible parameter in assessing fetal stomach size. Yonsei Med39 (1998) 222Search in Google Scholar

11 Pretorius DH, BB Gosink, T Clautice-Engle, GR Leopold, CM Minnick: Sonographic evaluation of the fetal stomach: significance of nonvisualization. AJR151 (1988) 987Search in Google Scholar

12 Sase M, H Asada, M Okuda, H Kato: Fetal gastric size in normal and abnormal pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol19 (2002) 467Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2005-07-01
Published in Print: 2005-07-01

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 31.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2005.060/pdf
Scroll to top button