Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies ζηλοτυπ[ίᾳ ......] οἰστρηθεισ̃ α: Domestic Violence and Revenge in Sophocles’ Tereus
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

ζηλοτυπ[ίᾳ ......] οἰστρηθεισ̃ α: Domestic Violence and Revenge in Sophocles’ Tereus

  • Fiona McHardy

    Fiona McHardy is Professor of Classics at the University of Roehampton. Her research interests include aspects of gender and violence in ancient Greek literature and culture. She is the author of Revenge in Athenian Culture (Duckworth, 2008) and co-editor of a number of volumes including with Lesel Dawson Revenge and Gender in Classical, Medieval and Renaissance Literature (Edinburgh, 2018), and with James Robson and David Harvey Lost Dramas of Classical Athens (University of Exeter Press, 2005).

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Tereus Through the Ages
This chapter is in the book Tereus Through the Ages

Abstract

This chapter examines the violent actions that characterise the plot of Sophocles’ Tereus through the lens of intimate partner violence and domestic abuse. It employs the recently developed concept of “social abuse”, where abusers intentionally isolate victims from social connections to exert control over them, to provide a new interpretation of the violent revenge taken by Procne in the tragedy. The investigation of Procne’s vengeful motivations stems from the analysis of the word zelotypia (often translated as “jealousy”), which is used in reference to Procne’s emotional state in the play’s hypothesis. Rather than seeing zelotypia as jealousy characterised by desire and love, it is understood as a possessive and rivalrous emotion, which is bred from and rearticulates acts of violence. It is argued that Procne’s revenge mirrors the coercive, controlling violence and emotional abuse of her husband, Tereus.

Abstract

This chapter examines the violent actions that characterise the plot of Sophocles’ Tereus through the lens of intimate partner violence and domestic abuse. It employs the recently developed concept of “social abuse”, where abusers intentionally isolate victims from social connections to exert control over them, to provide a new interpretation of the violent revenge taken by Procne in the tragedy. The investigation of Procne’s vengeful motivations stems from the analysis of the word zelotypia (often translated as “jealousy”), which is used in reference to Procne’s emotional state in the play’s hypothesis. Rather than seeing zelotypia as jealousy characterised by desire and love, it is understood as a possessive and rivalrous emotion, which is bred from and rearticulates acts of violence. It is argued that Procne’s revenge mirrors the coercive, controlling violence and emotional abuse of her husband, Tereus.

Downloaded on 28.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110728804-006/html
Scroll to top button