Home Linguistics & Semiotics A guide to Radical CV Phonology, with special reference to tongue root and tongue body harmony
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A guide to Radical CV Phonology, with special reference to tongue root and tongue body harmony

  • Harry van der Hulst
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Perspectives on Element Theory
This chapter is in the book Perspectives on Element Theory

Abstract

In this article, I provide an outline of Radical CV Phonology (RCVP). This model covers segmental structure and syllabic structure. Key properties of this model are the use of dependency relations, and a reduction of the set of phonological elements to just two unary elements: |C| and |V|. Each of those two elements correlates with different although related phonetic interpretations (which are expressed by individual features in traditional feature systems), depending on their positions in the segmental and syllabic structure and on their status as heads or dependents. The model is supported by typological studies on phonemic contrast, as well as affinities between traditional features that are usually captured in terms of stipulative redundancy rules. This article is faithful to the 2020 version of the model in van der Hulst (2020), although some alternatives to the 2020 model are considered with regard to tongue root distinctions.

Abstract

In this article, I provide an outline of Radical CV Phonology (RCVP). This model covers segmental structure and syllabic structure. Key properties of this model are the use of dependency relations, and a reduction of the set of phonological elements to just two unary elements: |C| and |V|. Each of those two elements correlates with different although related phonetic interpretations (which are expressed by individual features in traditional feature systems), depending on their positions in the segmental and syllabic structure and on their status as heads or dependents. The model is supported by typological studies on phonemic contrast, as well as affinities between traditional features that are usually captured in terms of stipulative redundancy rules. This article is faithful to the 2020 version of the model in van der Hulst (2020), although some alternatives to the 2020 model are considered with regard to tongue root distinctions.

Downloaded on 21.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110691948-005/html
Scroll to top button