Home Linguistics & Semiotics A case of non-derived stand-alone nominalization
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A case of non-derived stand-alone nominalization

Evidence from Japanese
  • Janick Wrona
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Nominalization in Asian Languages
This chapter is in the book Nominalization in Asian Languages

Abstract

It has been argued that stand-alone nominalizations derive from a copula-type nominalization (Yap, Matthews & Horie 2004; Yap & Matthews 2008). This paper takes a detailed look at the history of a stand-alone type main-clause nominalization in Japanese and argues that there is no evidence for this type of development.Instead it is proposed that the stand-alone type is one of several uses of nominalizations. In light of evidence that stand-alone nominalizations need not be derived, several languages for which the copula-type>stand-alone development has been proposed are re-examined and the conclusion is that the non-derived view for stand-alone nominalizations should be seriously considered in the absence of evidence to the contrary.

Abstract

It has been argued that stand-alone nominalizations derive from a copula-type nominalization (Yap, Matthews & Horie 2004; Yap & Matthews 2008). This paper takes a detailed look at the history of a stand-alone type main-clause nominalization in Japanese and argues that there is no evidence for this type of development.Instead it is proposed that the stand-alone type is one of several uses of nominalizations. In light of evidence that stand-alone nominalizations need not be derived, several languages for which the copula-type>stand-alone development has been proposed are re-examined and the conclusion is that the non-derived view for stand-alone nominalizations should be seriously considered in the absence of evidence to the contrary.

Downloaded on 6.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.96.15wro/html
Scroll to top button