Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
If Voters Won't Go for Taxing Oil to Conserve Energy, How Do We Do It?
-
Aaron S. Edlin
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
21. November 2006
Proposition 87 reemphasized that Americans don't want the cost of driving to increase: Aaron Edlin suggests a way to reduce driving that may be more politically palatable.
Published Online: 2006-11-21
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Column
- Do Economists Agree on Anything? Yes!
- If Voters Won't Go for Taxing Oil to Conserve Energy, How Do We Do It?
- Freak-Freakonomics
- Letter
- Letter: Replacing Payroll with Sales Taxes Shifts Risks from Firms to Governments
- Letter: Current Insurance Pricing Unduly Limits Car Ownership
- Letter: Is Professor Quigley Too Cynical?
- Letter: Pay-As-You-Drive Is More Apt to Reduce Accidents than Global Warming
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Column
- Do Economists Agree on Anything? Yes!
- If Voters Won't Go for Taxing Oil to Conserve Energy, How Do We Do It?
- Freak-Freakonomics
- Letter
- Letter: Replacing Payroll with Sales Taxes Shifts Risks from Firms to Governments
- Letter: Current Insurance Pricing Unduly Limits Car Ownership
- Letter: Is Professor Quigley Too Cynical?
- Letter: Pay-As-You-Drive Is More Apt to Reduce Accidents than Global Warming
