Abstract
Head-on interaction of four dust ion acoustic (DIA) solitons and the statistical properties of the wave field due to head-on interaction of solitons moving in opposite direction is studied in the framework of two Korteweg de Vries (KdV) equations. The extended Poincaré–Lighthill–Kuo (PLK) method is applied to obtain two opposite moving KdV equations from an unmagnetized four component plasma model consisting of Maxwellian negative ions, cold mobile positive ions, κ-distributed electrons and positively charged dust grains. Hirota’s bilinear method is adopted to obtain two-soliton solutions of both the KdV equations and accordingly act of soliton turbulence is presented due to head-on collision of four solitons. The amplitude and shape of the resultant wave profile at the point of strongest interaction are obtained. To see the effect of head-on collision on the statistical properties of wave field the first four moments are computed. It is observed that the head-on collision has no effect on the first integral moment while the second, third and fourth moments increase in the dominant interaction region of four solitons, which is a clean indication of soliton turbulence.
1 Introduction
The presence of charged dust particles modifies the wave spectra as well as introduces a number of eigenmodes, such as dust acoustic mode [1], dust drift mode [2], Shukla–Varma mode [3], dust lattice mode [4], dust cyclotron mode [5], dust ion acoustic (DIA) mode [6] and dust Berstain–Green–Kruskal mode [7]. DIA waves are low frequency analogue of ion acoustic waves and can be observed in laboratory [8], [9] as well as in space environment [10], [11], [12], [13]. In recent years, a number of researches have been made to study linear and non linear DIA wave propagation [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Alinejad [14] studied the formation of large amplitude DIA waves in a multicomponent dusty plasma consisting of warm ions, two-temperatured trapped electrons and dust particles with negative charge and observe that the solitary structures are significantly affected by low and high temperature electrons. Khalid et al. [18] investigated the propagation of DIA cnoidal waves in a dusty plasma system where electron follows non-thermal distribution. They have shown that the non-linear ion flux depends significantly on dust concentration and non-thermality parameter. El-Bedwehy et al. [19] have investigated the modulational instability (MI) of DIA waves in a dusty plasma model containing warm ions fluid, generalized (r, q) distributed electrons and immobile dust grains.
A fairly large number of investigations consider distribution for the electrons and ions as Maxwell–Boltzmann. However, there are number of theoretical evidences that the space plasmas can have particle distribution with high energy tail, and they deviates from the Maxwellian distribution [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Superthermal particle arises as a result of external forces acting on the natural space plasma environment or the presence of wave particle interaction. In general plasmas with excess amount superthermal electrons are characterized by a long tail in the high energy region. Generalized Lorentzian or kappa distributions [21], [27], [28], [29] are used to model such kind of space plasmas. The form of the three-dimensional isotropic kappa velocity distribution is [27]
where
where ϕ is the electrostatic potential and is normalized by electron thermal energy kBTe/e.
Soliton is one of the most common non-linear structures in any weakly dispersive media and the dynamics of soliton are well understood in the framework of KdV equation [30], [31], [32]. Extensive studies on the collision of solitons in liquids have been reported in the studies by Maxworthy and Craig et al. [33], [34]. In one-dimensional system, the interaction of solitons may occur in two different ways: (i) the overtaking collision and exchange collision depending on the amplitude ratio of propagating solitons [35], when solitons are moving in the same direction with different velocities and (ii) the head-on interaction, when the angle between the propagating solitons is π and they approaches to each other. Zabusky et al. [36] studied the overtaking collision of solitons with different amplitudes and observed that after the interaction, the solitons reappear and move with same velocity, but their trajectories deviate from the straight line. Harvey et al. [37] experimentally studied the head-on collision of two solitons with equal amplitude and found that the phase shift depends on the initial amplitude of solitons. The head-on collision of ion acoustic solitons in an unmagnetized plasmas with Cairns non-thermal distributed electrons has been studied by Verheest et al. [38]. El-Labany et al. [39] examined the oblique interaction of two KdV solitons moving towards each other from opposite directions in an magnetized dusty electronegative plasma consisting of cold mobile positive ions, Boltzmann negative ions, Boltzmann electrons and dust particles of both polarities. They have observed that the angle of collision, the density and temperature of negative ions and the opposite polarity dust density have reasonable effects on the phase shift. Roy et al. [40] studied the features of the head-on collision and overtaking collision of four solitons in plasmas using extended PLK method. El-Labany et al. [41] have investigated the head-on collision of two, four and six solitons in an unmagnetized non-extensive plasma system. But none of the above studies on head-on collision of solitons reveals the changes in the statistical properties of the wave field during the head-on collision process of the solitons.
The interaction of a large number of random and weakly dispersive waves leads to the prediction of several stationary statistical states, such as weak turbulence, statistical equilibrium or integrable turbulence. Weak wave turbulence features an ensemble of non-linear interacting waves. The weak turbulence theory predicts an energy transfer through resonant interactions among waves and also provides analytical predictions of the statistical properties of turbulence such as the stationary wave spectrum. The interaction of number of solitons in a nonlinear integrable system changes the statistical properties of the wave field and leads to integrable soliton turbulence [42], [43]. One of the important aspect of turbulence theory is to know the distribution function of the wave field and statistical moments (mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis) of the wave field, which are obtained from the measurements in the studies [44], [45], [46], [47]. Recently, some works have been reported on the soliton interaction and the statistical properties of the wave field in integrable and non-integrable systems [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]. Pelinovsky et al. [48] showed that interaction of two-solitons in KdV equation leads to the decrease of third- and fourth-order moments of the wave field while the first and second moments remains invariant. Dutykh et al. [49] studied the collective behaviour of soliton ensembles using direct numerical simulations in integrable KdV and non-integrable KdV–BBM (Benjamin–Bona–Macon) equations. Redor et al. [54] experimentally observed the ensemble of bidirectional shallow water solitons in a 34 m long flume taking advantage of the process of fission of a sinusoidal wave train. The interplay between multiple solitons and dispersive radiation has been analysed by Fourier transform and the observed random soliton ensemble has been interpreted as representing a soliton gas. Didenkulova et al. [55] investigated soliton turbulence in the framework of Gardner equation and showed that the interaction of solitons with different polarities leads to the formation of extreme waves. Ali et al. [56] studied the interaction of three solitons and soliton turbulence in a dusty plasma system in the framework of KdV equation. But till today, there is no work on the statistical properties of the wave field due to the head-on collision of solitons. In this work, our goal is to investigate the properties of the resultant solitonic structure at the time of head-on interaction of four solitons and also the statistical properties of the wave field during the collision.
2 Model equations
We have considered a four component dusty plasma model comprising cold mobile inertial positive ions, negative ions following Maxwellian distribution, κ distributed electrons and stationary dust grains with positive charge. The DIA waves are governed by the following fluid equations in normalized form
where np represents the number density of positive ions, up is the speed of positive ions, μe = ne0/np0, μd = Zdnd0/np0, with ne0, np0, nd0 representing the number densities of electron, positive ion and dust, respectively, and Zd is the charge on the dust grains. The parameter α is the ratio of electron temperature (Te) and negative ion temperature (Tn). The space variable x is normalized to the Debye wavelength
3 Derivation of two-sided KdV equations
In order to study the head-on collision of solitons in plasma model under consideration, the extended PLK perturbation method is used [38], [39], [40], [41], [57]. According to extended PLK perturbation method, the dependent variables expanded as
The independent variables x and t can be written as
where ξ and η refer to the directions of the solitary waves propagating in opposite directions with phase velocity λ. From Eqs. (11)–(13), one can obtain
Using Eqs. (8)–(15) into the set of Eqs. (3)–(5) and collecting the coefficients of the same powers of ϵ, the lowest order non-zero perturbed quantities are obtained as
The unknown functions
where
The coefficients of the next order of ϵ give
After some algebraic calculation the coefficient of the next higher order of ϵ gives
where
Equations (24) and (25) represents the oppositely propagating two-sided KdV equations in the reference frame ξ and η, respectively. The solitary wave solutions of Eqs. (24) and (25) are
where U is the speed of both the solitary waves.
After the head-on collision the phase shift of the solitons can be determined as
The soliton (28) is traveling to the right and the soliton (29) is traveling to the left. Equations (30) and (31) indicate that the solitons (28) and (29) experience a negative phase shifts in their traveling direction. The negative phase shift after the collision means that the positions of the propagated solitons are behind the positions where they would have been if they just passed through each other without interacting [58].
4 Two-soliton solution
Using Hirota’s bilinear method [59], the two-soliton solutions of Eqs. (24) and (25) are obtained as
and
respectively. Where
and
The properties of the resultant soliton during the interaction of the four solitons given by Eqs. (32) and (33) propagating in opposite direction can be studied from
For
and
respectively, where the soliton amplitudes are written as
and the phase shifts due to collision are
Therefore, before and after the head-on interaction of four solitons, Eq. (34) can be written as
It is well established that the KdV equation has infinite number of conserved quantities (Kruskal integrals) [30], [31], [32]. The first four conserved quantities of the KdV, Eqs. (24) and (25), are of the form
where
The form of the Kruskal integrals for the resultant soliton (34) is
The integrals (44), (45) and (46) represent the mass, energy and moments of instability of wave field. It is evident from Eqs. (40)–(43) that for the resultant wave (34), only the integral (44) will be conserved as it is the sum of two conserved quantities (I1 = I1ξ + I1η). The integrals I2, I3 and I4 are not conserved as they cannot be expressed as the sum of conserved quantities.
5 Head-on collision and its impact on statistical properties of the wave field
The head-on collisions of four solitons given by Eqs. (32) and (33) are studied in this section. Monoley and Hodnett [61] showed that complete interaction of the solitons occurs at the point ξ = 0, τ = 0 for
and the amplitude of the resultant pulse at the point of strongest interaction is given by
Equation (48) determines the concavity of the resultant wave profile at the point ξ = 0, τ = 0. For 0 < R < 1/3 (where R = A2/A1 < 1), the resultant wave profile is concave downwards and hence, it will take the form of a single peak at the strongest interaction point. When 1/3 < R < 1, the wave profile is concave upwards and it will maintain a double peak status at the instant strongest interaction. Also, it is clear from Eq. (49) that the amplitude of the resulting impulse increases and exceeds the amplitude of the larger soliton due to head-on collision of four solitons two of which are moving from left to right and other two from right to left. The right moving solitons with amplitudes A1 and A2 (A1 > A2) collides at the point ξ = 0, τ = 0 and at that point the amplitude of the resultant pulse becomes (A1 − A2) [62]. Similarly the left moving solitons with amplitudes A1 and A2 (A1 > A2) collides at the point η = 0, τ = 0 and at the point of complete interaction, the resultant pulse amplitude become (A1 − A2). Finally, both the resultant pulses superimposed during the head-on collision and makes the resultant pulse amplitude 2(A1 − A2). Thus, there is a possibility of formation of large wave in the head-on interaction of four solitons. Figures 1 and 2 shows the head-on interaction process of four solitons.

Head-on interaction process of four solitons with parameter values μe = 0.6, μd = 0.25, α = 3, κ = 2.3, R = 0.3, k1 = 0.5.

Head-on interaction process of four solitons with parameter values μe = 0.6, μd = 0.25, α = 3, κ = 2.3, R = 0.4, k1 = 0.5.
The interaction of these solitons changes the statistical behaviour of the integrable system and leads to the theory of integrable turbulence or soliton turbulence which is an active field of research [42], [43] and is best described by the statistical theory [63], [64]. To study the effect of these collisions of solitons on the statistical properties of the random wave field, we consider the following four moments of the wave field
The moments M1, M2, M3 and M4 are related to the mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis of the probability distribution of the random wave field. Skewness represents the asymmetry of the probability distribution function of the random soliton amplitudes and kurtosis indicates the heaviness of the tails of the distribution function [49]. Using the non-interacting solitonic structure (39) the analytical calculation of Eqs. (50)–(53) are shown below:
The numerical evolution of M2, M3 and M4 using the resultant solitonic structure (34) is depicted in Figure 3.

Variations of M2, M3 and M4 in the head-on interaction process with the parameter values μe = 0.6, μd = 0.25, α = 3, κ = 2.3, R = 0.3, k1 = 0.5.
From Figure 3, it is noticed that the second-order moment (M2), third-order moment (M3) and fourth-order moment M4 increases due to the head-on collision of four solitons. The increase of M2 says that the energy of the resultant soliton and hence its amplitude increases during the head-on collision of four solitons, which is observed from Figures 1(b) and 2(b). Figure 4 depicts the relative deviations

Dependence of the relative variations
6 Conclusion
We have studied the head-on interaction of four DIA solitons in the framework of two oppositely propagating KdV equations in a dusty plasma comprising Maxwellian negative ions, cold mobile positive ions, κ-distributed electrons and positively charged dust grains. It is observed that the head-on collision leads to the increase of second-, third and fourth-order moments of the non-linear wave field while the first-order moment remains unaffected. Also, we have observed that the resultant wave amplitude increases at the strongest interaction point. The relative variation of second-order moment is monotonic and is a constant, which indicates the conservation of energy in the whole system. Also, the relative variations in third and fourth-order moments are non-monotonic and the change for both the curves occurs at R = 0.33, which is a transition point of single peak and double peak status. The findings of this investigation may be helpful to explain the interaction features of DIA waves in space plasma environment [65], [66], [67], [68] and in laboratory devices [69], [70], [71], [72], where electronegative dusty plasma with Boltzmann distributed negative ions and κ-distributed electrons exists.
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
[1] N. N. Rao, P. K. Shukla, and M. Y. Yu, “Dust-acoustic waves in dusty plasmas,” Planet. Space Sci., vol. 38, p. 543, 1990, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(90)90147-i.Suche in Google Scholar
[2] P. K. Shukla, M. Y. Yu, and R. Bharuthram, “Linear and nonlinear dust drift waves,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 96, p. 21343, 1991, https://doi.org/10.1029/91ja02331.Suche in Google Scholar
[3] P. K. Shukla and R. K. Varma, “Convective cells in nonuniform dusty plasmas,” Phys. Fluid. Plasma Phys., vol. 5, p. 236, 1993, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.860864.Suche in Google Scholar
[4] F. Melandso, “Lattice waves in dust plasma crystals,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 3, p. 3890, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871577.Suche in Google Scholar
[5] R. L. Merlino, A. Barkan, C. Thompson, and N. D’Angelo, “Laboratory studies of waves and instabilities in dusty plasmas,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 5, p. 1607, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.872828.Suche in Google Scholar
[6] I. Kourakis and P. K. Shukla, “Lagrangian description of nonlinear dust-ion acoustic waves in dusty plasmas,” Eur. Phys. J. D, vol. 30, p. 97, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2004-00068-4.Suche in Google Scholar
[7] M. Tribeche and T. H. Zerguini, “Small amplitude Bernstein–Greene–Kruskal solitary waves in a thermal charge-varying dusty plasma,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 11, p. 4115, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1768957.Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Y. Nakamura, “Experiments on ion-acoustic solitons in plasmas invited review article,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., vol. 10, p. 180, 1982, https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.1982.4316165.Suche in Google Scholar
[9] A. Barkan, N. D’Angelo, and R. L. Merlino, “Charging of dust grains in a plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 73, p. 3093, 1994, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.73.3093.Suche in Google Scholar
[10] M. C. Bagelmaan, R. D. Blanford, and M. J. Rees, “Theory of extragalactic radio sources,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 56, p. 255, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.56.255.Suche in Google Scholar
[11] M. Tribeche, K. Aoutou, S. Younsi, and R. Amour, “Nonlinear positron acoustic solitary waves,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 16, p. 072103, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3160619.Suche in Google Scholar
[12] M. M. Masud, M. Asaduzzaman, and A. A. Mamun, “Dust-ion-acoustic shock waves in a two-electron-temperature dusty plasma,” J. Plasma Phys., vol. 79, p. 215, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022377812000852.Suche in Google Scholar
[13] A. El-Depsy and M. M. Selim, “Propagation of cylindrical ion acoustic waves in a plasma with q-nonextensive electrons with nonthermal distribution,” Eur. Phys. Jour. Plus, vol. 131, p. 431, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2016-16431-9.Suche in Google Scholar
[14] H. Alinejad, “Formation of dust ion-acoustic solitary waves in a dusty plasma with two-temperature trapped electrons,” Astrophys. Space Sci., vol. 334, p. 325, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-011-0718-6.Suche in Google Scholar
[15] H. Alinejad, “Dust ion-acoustic solitary waves in a dusty plasma with arbitrarily charged dust and flat-trapped electrons,” Astrophys. Space Sci., vol. 334, p. 331, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-011-0719-5.Suche in Google Scholar
[16] W. F. El-Taibany, N. A. El-Bedwehy, and E. F. El-Shamy, “Three-dimensional stability of dust-ion acoustic solitary waves in a magnetized multicomponent dusty plasma with negative ions,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 18, p. 033703, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3570662.Suche in Google Scholar
[17] S. K. El-Labany, W. F. El-Taibany, and M. M. El-Fayoumy, “Large-amplitude dust-ion acoustic solitary waves in a dusty plasma with nonthermal electrons,” Astrophys. Space Sci., vol. 341, p. 527, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1089-3.Suche in Google Scholar
[18] M. Khalid, Ata-ur-Rahman, F. Hadi, and A. Zeb, “Nonlinear ion flux caused by dust ion-acoustic nonlinear periodic waves in non-thermal plasmas,” Pramana - J. Phys., vol. 92, p. 86, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-019-1749-8.Suche in Google Scholar
[19] N. A. El-Bedwehy and W. F. El-Taibany, “Modulational instability of dust-ion acoustic waves in the presence of generalized (r, q) distributed electrons,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 27, p. 012107, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121540.Suche in Google Scholar
[20] A. Sinha and B. Sahu, “Dust-ion-acoustic waves in unmagnetized 4-component plasma,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05170, 2020.10.1016/j.asr.2020.11.023Suche in Google Scholar
[21] V. M. Vasyliunas, “A survey of low-energy electrons in the evening sector of the magnetosphere with OGO 1 and OGO 3,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 73, pp. 2839–2884, 1968, https://doi.org/10.1029/ja073i009p02839.Suche in Google Scholar
[22] M. P. Leubner, “On Jupiter’s whistler emission,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 87, pp. 6335–6338, 1982, https://doi.org/10.1029/ja087ia08p06335.Suche in Google Scholar
[23] Z. Emami and H. R. Pakzad, “Solitons of KdV and modified KdV in dusty plasmas with superthermal ions,” Indian J. Phys., vol. 85, pp. 1643–1652, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-011-0178-4.Suche in Google Scholar
[24] M. A. Hellberg, T. K. Baluku, F. Verheest, and I. Kourakis, “Dust-acoustic supersolitons in a three-species dusty plasma with kappa distributions,” J. Plasma Phys., vol. 79, p. 1039, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022377813001153.Suche in Google Scholar
[25] O. R. Rufai, R. Bharuthram, S. V. Singh, and G. S. Lakhina, “Effect of excess superthermal hot electrons on finite amplitude ion-acoustic solitons and supersolitons in a magnetized auroral plasma,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 22, p. 102305, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933000.Suche in Google Scholar
[26] K. Arshad, A. Aman-ur-Rehman, and S. Mahmood, “Landau damping of Langmuir twisted waves with kappa distributed electrons,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 22, p. 112114, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935845.Suche in Google Scholar
[27] D. Summers and R. M. Thorne, “The modified plasma dispersion function,” Phys. Fluid. Plasma Phys., vol. 3, pp. 1835–1847, 1991, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.859653.Suche in Google Scholar
[28] R. L. Mace and M. A. Hellberg, “A dispersion function for plasmas containing superthermal particles,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 2, pp. 2098–2109, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871296.Suche in Google Scholar
[29] T. K. Baluku and M. A. Hellberg, “Dust acoustic solitons in plasmas with kappa-distributed electrons and/or ions,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 15, p. 123705, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3042215.Suche in Google Scholar
[30] S. P. Novikov, S. V. Manakov, L. P. Pitaevskii, and V. E. Zakharov, The Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method, New York, Consultants, 1984.Suche in Google Scholar
[31] A. C. Newell, Solitons in Mathematics and Physics, Philadelphia, SIAM, 1985.10.1137/1.9781611970227Suche in Google Scholar
[32] P. G. Drazin and R. S. Johnson, Solitons: An Introduction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.Suche in Google Scholar
[33] T. Maxworthy, “Experiments on collisions between solitary waves,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 76, p. 177, 1976, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112076003194.Suche in Google Scholar
[34] W. Craig, P. Guyenne, J. Hammack, D. Henderson, and C. Sulem, “Solitary water wave interactions,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, p. 057106, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2205916.Suche in Google Scholar
[35] P. D. Lax, “Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 21, p. 467, 1968, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160210503.Suche in Google Scholar
[36] N. J. Zabusky and M. D. Kruskal, “Interaction of “solitons” in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 15, p. 240, 1965, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.15.240.Suche in Google Scholar
[37] P. Harvey, C. Durniak, D. Samsonov, and G. Morfill, “Soliton interaction in a complex plasma,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 81, p. 057401, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.81.057401.Suche in Google Scholar
[38] F. Verheest, M. A. Hellberg, and W. A. Hereman, “Head-on collisions of electrostatic solitons in nonthermal plasmas,” Phys. Rev.E, vol. 86, p. 036402, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.86.036402.Suche in Google Scholar
[39] S. K. El-Labany, E. F. El-Shamy, and E. E. Behery, “Propagation and oblique collision of ion-acoustic solitary waves in a magnetized dusty electronegative plasma,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 20, p. 122114, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4853555.Suche in Google Scholar
[40] K. Roy, P. Chatterjee, and R. Roychoudhury, “Head on collision of multi-solitons in an electron-positron-ion plasma having superthermal electrons,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 21, p. 104509, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4898677.Suche in Google Scholar
[41] S. K. El-Labany, W. F. El-Taibany, E. E. Behery, and S. M. Fouda, “Collision of dust ion acoustic multisolitons in a non-extensive plasma using Hirota bilinear method,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 25, p. 013701, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5006916.Suche in Google Scholar
[42] V. E. Zakharov, “Kinetic equation for solitons,” Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 33, p. 538, 1971.Suche in Google Scholar
[43] V. E. Zakharov, “Turbulence in integrable systems,” Stud. Appl. Math., vol. 122, p. 219, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9590.2009.00430.x.Suche in Google Scholar
[44] K. Hasselmann, “On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum Part 1. General theory,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 12, p. 481, 1962, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112062000373.Suche in Google Scholar
[45] S. Dyachenko, A. C. Newell, and A.V. E. Zakharov, “Optical turbulence: weak turbulence, condensates and collapsing filaments in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation,” Phys. Nonlinear Phenom., vol. 57, p. 96, 1992, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90090-a.Suche in Google Scholar
[46] V. E. Zakharov and V. S. L’vov, “Statistical description of nonlinear wave fields,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron., vol. 18, p. 1084, 1975, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01040337.Suche in Google Scholar
[47] V. S. Lvov, Y. V. Lvov, A. C. Newell, and V. E. Zakharov, “Statistical description of acoustic turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 56, p. 390, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.56.390.Suche in Google Scholar
[48] E. N. Pelinovsky, E. G. Shurgalina, A. V. Sergeeva, T. G. Talipova, G. A. El, and R. H. J. Grimshaw, “Two-soliton interaction as an elementary act of soliton turbulence in integrable systems,” Phys. Lett., vol. 377, p. 272, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.11.037.Suche in Google Scholar
[49] D. Dutykh and E. Pelinovsky, “Numerical simulation of a solitonic gas in KdV and KdV-BBM equations,” Phys. Lett., vol. 378, p. 3102, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2014.09.008.Suche in Google Scholar
[50] E. N. Pelinovsky and E. G. Shurgalina, “Two-soliton interaction within the framework of the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron., vol. 57, p. 737, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-015-9560-y.Suche in Google Scholar
[51] E. N. Pelinovsky, and E. G. Shurgalina in Challenges in Complexity: Advances in Dynamics, Patterns, Cognition, I. Aronson, N. Rulkov, A. Pikovsky, and L. Tsimring, Eds., Berlin, Springer, 2017, pp. 295–306.10.1007/978-3-319-53673-6_18Suche in Google Scholar
[52] E. G. Shurgalina, “Features of the paired soliton interactions within the framework of the Gardner equation,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron., vol. 60, p. 703, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-018-9839-x.Suche in Google Scholar
[53] E. G. Shurgalina, “Mechanism of the emergence of rogue waves as a result of the interaction between internal solitary waves in a stratified basin,” Fluid Dynam., vol. 53, p. 59, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1134/s0015462818010123.Suche in Google Scholar
[54] I. Redor, E. Barthélemy, M. Michallet, M. Onorato, and N. Mordant, “Experimental evidence of a hydrodynamic soliton gas. Physical review letters,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, p. 214502, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.122.214502.Suche in Google Scholar
[55] E.G. Didenkulova (Shurgalina), “Numerical modeling of soliton turbulence within the focusing Gardner equation: rogue wave emergence,” Physica D, vol. 399, p. 35, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2019.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar
[56] R. Ali and P. Chatterjee, “Three-soliton interaction and soliton turbulence in superthermal dusty plasmas,” Z. Naturforsch., vol. 74, p. 757, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2018-0452.Suche in Google Scholar
[57] U. N. Ghosh, K. Roy, and P. Chatterjee, “Head-on collision of dust acoustic solitary waves in a four-component dusty plasma with nonthermal ions,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 18, p. 103703, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3644471.Suche in Google Scholar
[58] E. E. Behery, “Head-on collision of dust acoustic solitons in a nonextensive plasma with variable size dust grains of arbitrary charge,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 94, p. 053205, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.94.053205.Suche in Google Scholar
[59] R. Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511543043Suche in Google Scholar
[60] K. Roy, S. K. Ghosh, and P. Chatterjee, “Two-soliton and three-soliton interactions of electron acoustic waves in quantum plasma,” Pramana - J. Phys., vol. 86, p. 873, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1097-2.Suche in Google Scholar
[61] T. P. Moloney and P. F. Hodnett, “A new perspective on the N-soliton solution of the KdV equation,” in Proc. Royal Irish Academy. Section A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 89A, 1989, p. 205.Suche in Google Scholar
[62] C. M. Liu, C. H. Kong, and H. H. Hwung, “Three regimes of overtaking collision of two solitons,” J. Chin. Inst. Eng., vol. 31, p. 1057, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2008.9671458.Suche in Google Scholar
[63] A. A. Gelash and V. E. Zakharov, “Superregular solitonic solutions: a novel scenario for the nonlinear stage of modulation instability,” Nonlinearity, vol. 27, p. R1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/27/4/r1.Suche in Google Scholar
[64] D. S. Agafontsev and V. E. Zakharov, “Integrable turbulence generated from modulational instability of cnoidal waves,” Nonlinearity, vol. 29, p. 3551, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/29/11/3551.Suche in Google Scholar
[65] H. Massey, Negative Ions, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976, p. 663.Suche in Google Scholar
[66] W. Swiderin Ionospheric Modeling, J. N. Korenkov, Ed., Basel, Birkhauser, 1988, p. 403.10.1007/978-3-0348-6532-6_10Suche in Google Scholar
[67] P. Chaizy, H. Rème, J. A. Sauvaud, ., “Negative ions in the coma of comet Halley,” Nature, vol. 349, p. 393, 1991, https://doi.org/10.1038/349393a0.Suche in Google Scholar
[68] A. J. Coates, F. J. Crary, D. T. Young, ., “Ionospheric electrons in Titan’s tail: plasma structure during the Cassini T9 encounter,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 34, p. L22103, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030978.Suche in Google Scholar
[69] P. Kocian, “Radial density distribution of charged particles in an electronegative discharge plasma with space charges,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, p. 1710, 1975, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.861089.Suche in Google Scholar
[70] B. Song, N. D’Angelo, and R. L. Merlino, “Ion‐acoustic waves in a plasma with negative ions,” Phys. Fluid. Plasma Phys., vol. 3, p. 284, 1991, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.859736.Suche in Google Scholar
[71] I. Kaganovich, “Negative ion density fronts,” Phys. Plasmas, vol. 8, p. 2540, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1343088.Suche in Google Scholar
[72] Y. Ghim, and N. Hershkowitz, “Experimental verification of Boltzmann equilibrium for negative ions in weakly collisional electronegative plasmas,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 94, p. 151503, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3119627.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Dynamical Systems & Nonlinear Phenomena
- Soliton turbulence in electronegative plasma due to head-on collision of multi solitons
- Dynamic response analysis of fluid-saturated porous rectangular plates
- An unforced megastable chaotic oscillator and its application on protecting electrophysiological signals
- Hydrodynamics
- Blast waves propagation in magnetogasdynamics: power series method
- Quantum Theory
- Octonions, trace dynamics and noncommutative geometry—A case for unification in spontaneous quantum gravity
- Ground state wave function overlap in superconductors and superfluids
- Solid State Physics & Materials Science
- Investigation of zirconium nanowire by elastic, thermal and ultrasonic analysis
- Silver-coated three-core fiber Michelson interferometer for liquid-level measurement
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Dynamical Systems & Nonlinear Phenomena
- Soliton turbulence in electronegative plasma due to head-on collision of multi solitons
- Dynamic response analysis of fluid-saturated porous rectangular plates
- An unforced megastable chaotic oscillator and its application on protecting electrophysiological signals
- Hydrodynamics
- Blast waves propagation in magnetogasdynamics: power series method
- Quantum Theory
- Octonions, trace dynamics and noncommutative geometry—A case for unification in spontaneous quantum gravity
- Ground state wave function overlap in superconductors and superfluids
- Solid State Physics & Materials Science
- Investigation of zirconium nanowire by elastic, thermal and ultrasonic analysis
- Silver-coated three-core fiber Michelson interferometer for liquid-level measurement