Startseite On uncancelledness of events: a view from Mongolian
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

On uncancelledness of events: a view from Mongolian

  • Chigchi Bai ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. November 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
The Linguistic Review
Aus der Zeitschrift The Linguistic Review

Abstract

Once an event occurs, it can never be cancelled by its very nature. This paper, based on examination of the aspectual and modal properties of the completion marker -čih in Mongolian, shows that uncancelledness, a hitherto undocumented aspect of semantics, plays significant roles in aspectual and modal properties of verbs. It is argued that uncancelledness is an semantic primitive, which leads to the thorough completion of (the commencement of) events as well as a resultant state and causes modal effect by the virtue of the information available in the presupposition, say, contradiction.


Corresponding author: Chigchi Bai, School of Foreign Languages, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot, China, E-mail:
This work was supported by NSSFC [grant number. 21XYY018]. The work reported in this article has been partially presented at the 2024 Annual Conference of Association for Mongolian Language of China. I thank the audience for their comments and questions. I have also benefited from comments by two anonymous reviewers. All errors, if any, are mine.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 21XYY018

References

Baatarsukh, Kh. 2009. Mongolian grammar textbook. USA: Munkhbayar Batmunkh.Suche in Google Scholar

Binnick, R. 2012. The past tenses of the Mongolian verb. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004216143Suche in Google Scholar

Brosig, B. 2014. The tense-aspect system of Khorchin Mongolian. In P. Suihkonen & L. Whaley (eds.), Typology of languages of Europe and Northern and Central Asia, 3–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.164.01broSuche in Google Scholar

Buhjirgal & Enghe. 1977. Mongol Helnii Zui (Mongolian Grammar). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar

Byambasan, P., C. Önörbayan, B. Pürev-Ochir, J. Sanjaa & C. Janchivdorj. 1987. Orčin Cagiin Mongol Helnii Ügzüin Baiguulalt (The structure of (verbal) morphology of contemporary Mongolian). Ulaanbaatar: Shinjleh Uhaanii Akadyemi.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chingeltei. 1991. Menggu Yu Yufa (Mongolian Grammar). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar

Chingeltei. 1997. Hele Bičig-in tohai Öglel-in Tööböri (Essays on the Mongolian Language). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chuluu, Ü. 1998. Studies on Mongolian verb morphology. Toronto: University of Toronto. Unpublished doctoral thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Daobu. 1983. Mengu Yu Jianzhi (A Brief Survey of Mongolian). Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar

Hangin, J. 1968. Basic course in Mongolian. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Haserdeni, Gonchugsurung, Sechen, Tawatagba, Togoo & Naranbat. 1996. Orčin Cag-in Mongol Hele (Modern Mongolian). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Educational Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hashimoto, K. 1993. “Mongorugo no Kakokei Setubiji no Imi ni tuite” (On the meanings of the past endings in Mongolian). Gengo Kenkyu 12. 1–20.Suche in Google Scholar

Higginbotham, J. 2008. The English perfect and the metaphysics of events. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (eds.), Time and modality, 173–194. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_8Suche in Google Scholar

Ishikawa, M. 1992. Te-shimau to Sono Jyoihyougen ni kanshite” (On the te-shimau construction and its affective meaning). Gogaku Kenkyu 69. 89–115.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 2003. The Mongolic languages. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 2012. Mongolian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Kullmann, R. & D.-Y. Tserenpil. 1996. Mongolian grammar. Ulaanbaatar: Admon.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Narrog, H. 2003. On defining modality again. Language Sciences 27. 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Nasunbayar, Haserdeni, Sechen, Chogt, Tawatagba, Turgen & Naranbat. 1982. Orčin Cag-in Mongol Hele (Modern Mongolian). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Educational Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nelson, D., T. Davidson, Narmandah Narantuya & J. Nordby. 1998. Four past tense morphemes in Khalkh Mongol. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 6. 115–131.Suche in Google Scholar

Otgonsüren, D. 1982. Orcin Cagiin Mongol Helnii Üil Ügiin Heb, Baidliin Dagabriin Nairuulgiin Üüreg. Ulaanbaatar: ShUA.Suche in Google Scholar

Parsons, T. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Poppe, N. 1960. Buriat Grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University.Suche in Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 2016. Alternative semantics. In C. Fery & Sh. Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 19–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.19Suche in Google Scholar

Sanders, A. & J. Bat-Ireedui. 1999. Colloquial Mongolian. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Sanzheyev, G. D. 1973. The modern Mongolian language. Moscow: NAUKA Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar

Shiotani, Sh. 1991. “Moukohishi” no Doushitai ‘üderi--üderid-’ ni Mieru Matubi no ‘-d-’ no Kaishyaku wo Megutte” (On the Interpretation of the ending -d- of üderi- and üderid- in The Secret History of the Mongols). Gengo Kenkyu 10. 23–61.Suche in Google Scholar

Shiotani, Sh. 2007. “Mongorugo Haruha Hougen ni okeru Haseisetubiji no Kenkyu” (A Study of the Derivational Suffixes in Khalkha Mongolian). Osaka: Osaka University of Foreign Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Soh, H. L. 2009. Speaker presupposition and Mandarin Chinese sentence final -le: A unified analysis of the ‘change of state’ and the ‘contrary to expectation’ reading. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(3). 623–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9074-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Street, J. 1963. Khalkha structure. Bloomington: Indiana University.Suche in Google Scholar

Svantesson, J.-O. 1991. Tense, Mood and Aspect in Mongolian. Lund University, Department of Linguistics, Working Papers 38. 189–204.Suche in Google Scholar

Tegshiduureng. 2005. Mongol Helnii Ug Buteeh Yosonii Sudlal (A Study of Word Formation in Mongolian). Liaoning: Liaoning Nationalities Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-04-30
Accepted: 2025-11-12
Published Online: 2025-11-21

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 23.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2025-0006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen