Research on the control method of turbine outlet temperature limitation protection based on nonlinear state estimation
-
Yuan Liu
Abstract
Developing multivariable control schedules for turboshaft engines addresses critical safety demands in aero-engine performance. This study introduces a turbine outlet temperature (TOT) limitation protection method using nonlinear state estimation. A turboshaft engine multivariable controller is designed, complemented by a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BLSTM) network-based onboard model. Validation shows less than 2 % relative error between the BLSTM model and the component-level engine model. To enhance precision, an Unscented Kalman State Estimator (UKSE) leverages residuals from power turbine speed data to estimate TOT (parameter T45), achieving a 1.4 % estimation error. The UKSE framework enables proactive temperature limitation control by dynamically adjusting protection thresholds. Experimental tests under two flight conditions confirm the method’s efficacy: 1) TOT exceedance magnitude decreases by 75 %, 2) overtemperature duration shortens by over 50 %, and 3) temperature violations are fully eliminated in specific scenarios. These results highlight the integration of BLSTM modeling and UKSE-based estimation as a robust strategy for mitigating turbine thermal risks while maintaining operational stability. The approach bridges model-based control and real-time adaptive protection, offering a scalable solution for next-generation engine safety systems.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: All other authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Xifeng, Z, Fengqin, B. Current status and development of aeronautical propulsion system simulation technology abroad. Aeronaut Syst Eng 1995:43–7.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Miklosovic, R, Gao, Z. A dynamic decoupling method for controlling high performance turbofan engines. IFAC Proc Vol 2005;38:532–7. https://doi.org/10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.00489.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Liu, J , Wang, X , Zhu, M. Multivariable adaptive control method for turbofan engine with dynamic and input uncertainties. J Eng Gas Turbines Power: Transactions ASME, 2021:143.10.1115/1.4049296Suche in Google Scholar
4. Yiwen, Q, Zheng, C. Survey of aeroengine safety protection control study. Aeronaut Sci Technol 2017;28:1–6.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Kai, Y, Fang, W. Starting control strategy considering limit protection for turbofan engine. Aeroengine 2016;42:34–7.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Xi, W, Zhipeng, L. Design of limit protection controller with closed loop for turbofan engine. Aeroengine 2016;42:1–7.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Shi, WANG, Wang, RCHEN Z. Survey on aircraft engine health management. Gas Turbine Expe Res 2009:1–58.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Huang Ximing, HONG X. FENG Caixia.A survey on aeroengine heath management technology. Aeronaut Testing Echnol Conf 2015:391–3.Suche in Google Scholar
9. CAIG Jing, Miao, X.Current situation and indexes of prognostics and health management system for aero-engines. Ement&Control Technol 2016;35:1–5.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Hunter, GW, Lekki, JD, Simon, DL. Development and testing of propulsion health management. Workshop I Veh Health Mang Aviat Saf 2012:1–6.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Jie, B, Mingliang, H. Optimal design of turbofan engine limit protection controller based on condition judgment criterion. Aeroengine 2022;48:109–13.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Rixing, Z, Zhaoyou, Z. Influence analysis of aero-engine temperature limit protection under temperature sensor failure. Sci Technol Eng 2021;21:5144–50.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Bingqiang, Y, Yongliang, Z. Multi-variable limit management of TBCC engine based on neural network inverse control. J Propuls Technol 2024;45:79–89.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Yuan, W, Qiuhong, L. Controller design for limit protection of aero-engine based on ADRC. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2012;38:1154–7.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Xian, D. Application of sliding mode control and model predictive control to limit management for aero-engines. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnic University.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Saluru, DC, Yedavalli, RK, Belapurkar, RK. Active fault tolerant model predictive control of a turbofan engine us PSS40k. In: ASME 5th annual dynamic systems and control conference; Fort Lauderdale, FL: ASME; 2012: 349–58 pp.10.1115/DSCC2012-MOVIC2012-8730Suche in Google Scholar
17. Wang, S, Feng, J. , Tse, CK. Novel cubature Kalman filtering for systems involving nonlinear states and linear measurements. AEUE – Int J Electron Commun 2015;69:314–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2014.09.017.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
