Startseite A new approach for the pleiotropic effect of metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Artikel Open Access

A new approach for the pleiotropic effect of metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • Yasemin Atici ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Gulden Baskol ORCID logo und Fahri Bayram ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. Mai 2022

Abstract

Objectives

Metformin is the first choice for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment in the guidelines and is used in combination with many drugs. Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (Gas6)/Axl signaling plays a role in many metabolic disorders. This study aims to investigate the effects of metformin and metformin-insulin combination used in patients with T2DM on Gas6, Axl, and soluble Axl (sAxl) levels.

Methods

A total of 71 patients diagnosed with T2DM and 21 healthy subjects were divided into 4 groups control, diet and exercises recommended (DER), metformin, and metformin + insulin. Diabetic patients were treated with metformin only or with a metformin-insulin combination and monitored for six months. Gas6, Axl, and sAxl levels of subjects’ sera obtained from their baseline and post-therapeutic sixth month blood samples were measured by ELISA methods.

Results

Compared to baseline, the sixth month Gas6 and Axl levels of metformin and metformin + insulin groups significantly decreased (p<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in sAxl values for these two groups of patients.

Conclusions

The use of metformin in diabetic patients may be beneficial for inhibiting the Gas6/Axl pathway. This study presents a new aspect of the pleiotropic effects of metformin. This study will be clinically useful for designing therapeutic approaches targeting Gas6/Axl.

Introduction

For long-term diabetic patients, insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs may need to be used together in order to control their glycemia. Metformin is one of such drugs belonging to the biguanide class of anti-diabetic compounds. It is the most preferred drug in the treatment of T2DM in combination with many drugs, and hence it is the first choice in the guidelines [1], [2], [3], [4].

Metformin appears to have pleiotropic effects in addition to an antihyperglycemic effect. The drug has provided clinical efficacy in conditions associated with hyperinsulinemia such as prediabetes, gestational diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [5], [6], [7].

Metformin may also have an antiproliferative effect in various cancer types such as pancreatic, breast, prostate, and colon tumors [8]. Reduced risk of cancer has been reported in T2DM patients treated with metformin compared to patients treated with other antidiabetic drugs [9].

Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (Gas6) protein is the ligand of Tyro3, Axl, and Mer receptors (TAM receptors). Gas6 protein binds and activates the TAM receptors. The binding affinity of Gas6 to TAM family receptors is as follows: Axl ≥ Tyro3 ≥ Mer [10].

Axl, a membrane-bound 140 kDa form, is expressed in many cells and tissues. Gas6 has a function in the pathogenesis of impaired glucose, insulin resistance, and homeostasis [11]. The vitamin K-dependent Gas6 binds Axl and causes autophosphorylation of Axl. This complex activates several downstream signaling pathways, including the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, one of the important signaling pathways involved in glucose metabolism [12].

Soluble Axl (sAxl) is an 85 kDa protein and it is produced by the proteolytic cleavage of extracellular domains by metalloproteinases (ADAM10 and ADAM17) and a disintegrin. sAxl is a negative regulator of endogenous Axl signaling [13]. Serum Gas6 circulates in a complex with sAxl and hence Gas6 is present at low concentrations in circulation [14].

The Gas6/Axl signaling has been shown to play an important role in inflammation, homeostasis, autoimmune diseases, nervous system, reproductive system, vascular system, cancer, and associated glucose intolerance with metabolic disorders [15, 16].

Studies have reported that the use of metformin in patients with T2DM regulates blood glucose and reduces the risk of cancer. Metformin treatment improves insulin sensitivity, inhibits hepatic glucose output, and lowers circulating insulin levels [17].

The clinical role of the Gas6/Axl pathway in the molecular mechanism of complications associated with T2DM is not fully understood. In addition, studies related to impaired glucose metabolism are controversial and insufficient. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of metformin and metformin-insulin combination on serum Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters in patients with T2DM. We also wanted to see how the effect changed when insulin was used in combination with metformin, and to determine whether sAxl levels were associated with transmembrane Axl levels.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This study was conducted with the approval of Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2018/370). Seventy-one patients diagnosed with T2DM and 21 healthy subjects admitted to Erciyes University Health Application and Research Center between 1 August 2018 and 1 March 2020 were included in the study. T2DM was diagnosed based on the American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Newly diagnosed T2DM patients and those previously diagnosed with T2DM were prospectively evaluated. The subjects were divided into 4 groups, control (11 females and 10 males), diet and exercise recommended (DER) (14 females and 8 males), metformin (Met) (16 females and 8 males), and metformin + insulin (Met + Ins) (11 females and 14 males). Diabetic patients were medicated with metformin only or with a metformin-insulin combination and monitored for 6 months.

Inclusion Criteria for the Control Group were as follows: Male and female individuals aged 20–65 years, BMI between 18 and 30 kg/m2, HbA1c<5.7%, non-smoking and non-alcohol consuming, and not using statin group drugs.

Inclusion criteria for the patient group: Male and female patients aged 20–65 years, BMI between 18 and 30 kg/m2, diabetes duration does not exceed 15 years (HbA1c≥5.7%), non-alcohol consuming and non-smoking patients, not using statin group drugs.

Exclusion criteria: Male and female patients who are not between the ages of 20 and 65 years, BMI not between 18 and 30 kg/m2, diabetes duration exceeds 15 years (HbA1c≥5.7%), alcohol-consuming and smoking patients, using statin group drugs.

The groups were determined according to the HbA1c levels of the patients. Treatments were determined by considering the lifestyles (diet and exercise) and age of the patients. Group 1 was the control group consisting of volunteers who were admitted to the outpatient clinic for routine control purposes and did not have any chronic diseases. Group 2 was the DER group consisting of volunteers newly diagnosed with T2DM, not using drugs but recommended diet and exercise. Group 3 was the Met group consisting of volunteers newly diagnosed with T2DM and planned to be treated with metformin. Group 4 was the Met + Ins group consisting of volunteers who were previously diagnosed with T2DM and treated with metformin but this treatment was not sufficient, and therefore they started insulin in combination with metformin. In this group, two patients used basal insulin, one used Basal + Bolus insulin, and nineteen used 2 or 3 mixed insulin.

Patients were prospectively treated for six months. Blood samples were collected from volunteers in the groups at the start of the study and six months after the start of treatment. All measurements were performed after the study.

Specimens

Fasting blood specimens were collected in evacuated blood collection tubes (SST, Dickinson & Company, USA) between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., and the specimens were centrifuged at 1300 g for 10 min. Then serums were removed and collected in Eppendorf tubes. Serum samples were kept frozen at −80 °C until the measurements.

Procedures

The study was carried out with materials obtained during routine examination and treatment procedures. During these studies, underwent routine treatment deemed appropriate by the physician to the patient. The study was conducted using the study groups’ volunteered individuals’ blood samples obtained during the routine examination and treatment procedures at the beginning of the study and then six months later.

Gas6, Axl, and sAxl serum protein concentrations were measured by sandwich Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) (Biotek, Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum Gas6, serum Axl and serum sAxl were detected using a human ELISA kit (YL Biotech, Shanghai, China), and the inter-assay and intra-assay values were <8% and <10%, respectively, for each of Gas6, Axl and sAxl. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and HbA1c values were measured to better evaluate the glycemic status of the patients in the study groups. Serum glucose levels were enzymatically measured using the hexokinase method in a Roche Cobas c701 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), while HbA1c measurements of the full blood samples were collected in EDTA-containing tubes were conducted immunoturbidimetrically in a Roche Cobas c501 immune analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany).

Statistical analysis

The data obtained in this study were statistically analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and Microsoft Excel® 365. Pearson’s chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Numerical variables were compared with tests suitable for dependent and independent samples (Wilcoxon test, Kruskal–Wallis H test, or Mann-Whitney U test) after the normality distribution was checked with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Results are given as medians (interquartile ranges). Two-sided p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. After the Kruskal–Wallis H test, Bonferroni correction of p-value was made for post-hoc analysis when necessary.

Results

Demographic information of T2DM groups and control group

Demographic information (gender, age, and body mass index) of the groups is presented in Table 1. The individuals in the control group and other groups were identical in terms of age (p=0.245) and gender (p=0.362). Also, body mass index (BMI) data did not differ statistically among the groups (p=0.132).

Table 1:

Demographic information of the study groups.

Control (n=21) DER (n=22) Met (n=24) Met + Ins (n= 25) p-Valuec
Gender (M/F)a 10/11 8/14 8/16 14/11 0.362
Age (Year)b 49 (10) 53 (13) 54 (12) 53 (18) 0.245
BMI (kg/m2)b 26.1 (5.0) 28.3 (5.5) 28.7 (5.5) 26.7 (3.8) 0.132
  1. DER, diet and exercise recommended group; Met, metformin group; Met + Ins, Metformin + Insulin group; M, male; F, female; BMI, body mass index. aThe data were given as rates. bThe data were given as medians (interquartile ranges-IQR). cKruskal–Wallis H and Pearson chi-square tests were used.

Comparison of the 0th and 6th month values of Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters of the groups

The comparison of the 0th and 6th month values of the Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters of the study groups is given in Table 2.

Table 2:

Comparison of Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters for Baseline and 6th month.

Groups Parameters 0 Month 6 Month p-Valuea
Control Gas6 (ng/mL) 10.8 (15) 9.1 (17) 0.547
Axl (ng/mL) 145.1 (207) 160.0 (429) 0.916
sAxl (pg/mL) 3.0 (4) 3.7 (14) 0.109
DER Gas6 (ng/mL) 10.5 (7) 9.5 (8) 0.137
Axl (ng/mL) 162.7 (99) 167.6 (117) 0.380
sAxl (pg/mL) 4.0 (3) 4.2 (3) 0.581
Met Gas6 (ng/mL) 10.7 (5) 7.4 (3) 0.028
Axl (ng/mL) 147.7 (88) 107.5 (53) 0.003
sAxl (pg/mL) 3.2 (2) 3.1 (1) 0.424
Met + Ins Gas6 (ng/mL) 10.6 (2) 8.1 (2) 0.009
Axl (ng/mL) 170.2 (49) 95.0 (43) 0.005
sAxl (pg/mL) 2.9 (1) 2.5 (1) 0.382
p-valueb Gas6 (ng/mL) 0.823 0.107
Axl (ng/mL) 0.360 0.001 c,d,e
sAxl (pg/mL) 0.222 0.240
  1. DER, diet and exercise recommended group; Met, Metformin group; Met + Ins, metformin + insulin group; Gas6, Growth Arrest Specific Protein 6; Axl, Axl; sAxl, Soluble Axl. The data were given as median (interquartile range-IQR). aThe comparison of the 0th and 6th month values of the Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters. bThe comparison of the parameters between all groups. Bold p-values indicate statistically significant differences. In the intergroup analysis: cp<0.05 for the difference between the control group and Met + Ins group; dp<0.05 for the difference between DER group and Met group; ep<0.05 for the difference between DER group and Met + Ins group.

There were no statistically significant changes in Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters in the groups without drug treatment (Control and DER groups). However, a statistically significant decrease in Gas6 and Axl values was detected in the Met and the Met + Ins groups. There were no statistically significant changes in sAxl values.

When the parameters (Gas6, Axl, and sAxl) of the study groups investigated in the 0th and 6th months were evaluated, there were no significant differences among the groups in the 0th month. In the 6th month, there were no significant differences in Gas6 and sAxl parameters between the groups, but only a significant decrease in Axl value was observed.

Comparison of FBG and HbA1c parameters for baseline and 6th month

The comparison of the baseline and 6th month values of the FBG and HbA1c parameters of the study groups is given in Table 3. When the FBG and HbA1c parameters of the study groups investigated in the 0th and 6th months were evaluated, there where a significant decrease was observed in the FBG and HbA1c values of the study groups, especially in the groups using drugs (Met group and Met + Ins group) (Table 3).

Table 3:

Comparison of FBG and HbA1c parameters for baseline and 6th month.

Parameters Control (n=21) DER (n=22) Met (n=24) Met + Ins (n=25) p-Valueg
FBG, mg/dL 93 (13) 98 (15) 129 (39) 226 (141) <0.05 b,c,d,e
(0th month)
FBG, mg/dL 95 (12) 102 (14) 113 (31) 137 (169) <0.05 b,c,e
(6th month)
HbA1c, % 5.4 (0.4) 5.9 (0.1) 7.2 (1.1) 10.0 (2.8) <0.05 a,b,c,e,f
(0th month)
HbA1c, % 5.4 (0.4) 6.0 (0.2) 6.5 (0.7) 8.0 (2.0) <0.05 a,b,c,e
(6th month)
  1. FBG, fasting blood glucose; DER, diet and exercise recommended group; Met, metformin group; Met + Ins, metformin + insulin group. ap<0.05 for the difference between the control group and DER group; bp<0.05 for the difference between the control group and Met group; cp<0.05 for the difference between the control group and Met + Ins group; dp<0.05 for the difference between DER group and Met group; ep<0.05 for the difference between DER group and Met + Ins group; fp<0.05 for the difference between Met group and Met + Ins group; gThe comparison of the parameters between all groups. Bold p-values indicate statistically significant differences. In the intergroup analysis.

Correlation of FBG and HbA1c levels with Gas6, Axl and sAxl parameters

A significant decrease was observed in the FBG and HbA1c values of the study groups, especially in the groups using drugs (Met group and Met + Ins group). There was also a decrease in Gas6 and Axl values. However, it was found that the 0th and 6th months FBG and HbA1c levels of the study groups did not significantly correlate with the corresponding Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters (Table 4).

Table 4:

Correlation of FBG and HbA1c levels with Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters for baseline and 6 months.

Parameters Groups n Gas6 Axl sAxl
r p-Value r p-Value r p-Value
FBG, mg/dL Met + Insa 25 0.140 0.078 −0.095 0.650 0.275 0.183
(0th month)
HbA1c Met + Insa 25 0.291 0.158 −0.308 0.134 −0.013 0.950
(0th month)
FBG, mg/dL Control 13 0.359 0.228 0.337 0.260 0.519 0.069
(6th month) DER 15 −0.414 0.125 −0.293 0.289 0.104 0.703
Met 12 0.224 0.484 0.056 0.863 0.392 0.208
Met + Ins 13 −0.527 0.064 −0.253 0.405 0.138 0.654
HbA1c (6th month) Control 13 −0.210 0.491 −0.285 0.345 −0.229 0.451
DER 15 0.114 0.687 −0.234 0.400 −0.279 0.314
Met 12 −0.359 0.252 −0.085 0.794 0.317 0.316
Met + Ins 13 −0.352 0.239 −0.357 0.231 −0.146 0.635
  1. FBG, fasting blood glucose; DER, diet and exercise recommended group; Met, metformin group; Met + Ins, metformin + insulin group. Spearman’s rho correlation analysis was applied. aCaution: at month 0, patients in the Met + Ins group were using only metformin during blood analysis.

Correlations of Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters according to use of antidiabetic drugs

Correlations of Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters of the study groups according to the use of antidiabetic drugs are given in Table 5. When the groups that did not use drugs were examined, a highly significant positive correlation was found between Gas6 and Axl; and a moderate statistically significant positive correlation was found with sAxl (r=0.725, p<0.001; r=0.541, p<0.001; respectively). A moderate positive correlation was found between Axl and sAxl (r=0.597, p<0.001). A significant moderate positive correlation was found between Gas6 and Axl in the Met group using metformin for 6 months (r=0.664, p<0.05), and between Axl and sAxl (r=0.587, p<0.05) in the Met + Ins group using insulin combined with metformin.

Table 5:

Correlations of Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters according to antidiabetic drug use status.

Groups n Axl sAxl
r p-Value r p-Value
0. Month (DER groups)a Gas6 67 0.725 <0.001 0.541 <0.001
Axl 0.597 <0.001
0. Month (Met + Ins groups)b Gas6 25 0.208 0.319 0.170 0.416
Axl 0.370 0.069
6. Month (Met groups)b Gas6 12 0.664 0.018 0.371 0.236
Axl 0.587 0.045
6. Month (Met + Ins groups)c Gas6 13 0.385 0.194 −0.281 0.353
Axl −0.437 0.135
  1. DER, diet and exercise recommended group; Met, metformin group; Met + ins, metformin + insulin group; Gas6, growth arrest specific protein 6; Axl, Axl; sAxl, Soluble Axl. Spearman’s rho correlation analysis was applied. Significant results are written in bold. aPatients included in the control, DER and Met groups were not using any antidiabetic agents at the 0th month. bThe patients in the Met + Ins group were using only metformin during blood analysis at the 0th month and the patients in the Met group at the 6th month. cThe patients in the Met + Ins group were using insulin therapy for 6 months in addition to metformin. Bold p-values indicate statistically significant differences.

Discussion

In this study, the effects of metformin alone and the effects of insulin used in combination with metformin, in patients with T2DM on Gas6, Axl, and sAxl levels were investigated. Present studies showed that the effect of metformin on the Gas6/Axl pathway was generally carried out in vitro. Therefore, this study is one of the first studies conducted clinically. In this study, a statistically significant decrease was found in Gas6 and Axl levels in patients with T2DM who received metformin treatment. In addition, a statistically significant decrease was observed in Gas6 and Axl levels in the Met + Ins treatment group. sAxl levels were similar in all groups.

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of susceptibility to cancer. It has been suggested that insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in T2DM directly or indirectly promote malignant transformation [18, 19]. Several studies have reported an increased incidence of breast, endometrial, and colorectal cancers in the first months after T2DM diagnosis and even in the prediabetes phase [20].

Metformin is a widely used pharmacological agent for the treatment of T2DM. It is the first choice of treatment for complications that are common in long-term T2DM patients and is used in combination with injectable and oral treatments [21, 22]. Studies are showing that the use of metformin in patients with T2DM reduces the risk of cancer [23, 24]. In the study of Evans et al. using metformin has been associated with a reduced prevalence of cancer in patients with T2DM [25].

Axl has emerged as a new biomarker due to its role in biological processes and tumor formation, while Gas6 is a ligand of Axl [26]. Gas6/Axl signaling pathway plays a role in pathological mechanisms for complications such as cardiovascular diseases, kidney dysfunction, amputations, nerve damage, and erectile dysfunction associated with T2DM [27].

Hung et al. showed that plasma Gas6 concentrations were significantly lower among patients with new-onset T2DM and its value was inversely correlated with fasting glucose. Plasma Gas6 is associated with altered glucose tolerance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction [28].

In a study, although plasma Gas6 concentrations were higher in women than in men, the difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, both male and female patients were included in this study. They also reported that Gas6 concentrations were negatively correlated with insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, E-selection, and IL-6 [29].

Lee et al. investigated the relationship between Gas6 gene polymorphism (c.834+7G > A) and T2DM pathogenesis. They divided the individuals of the study group into different subgroups according to Gas6 genotypes such as AA, GA, and GG. As a result, they showed that subjects with the AA genotype had higher Gas6 levels and lower levels of glucose, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, and triglycerides compared to subjects with the GG genotype. They reported that the AA genotype of the Gas6c.834+7G>A polymorphism might have a protective role against T2DM [30].

Cavet et al. demonstrated that varying glucose concentration in vascular smooth muscle cells had a significant effect on the Gas6/Axl signal. They reported that Gas6/Axl was stimulated by low glucose levels, caspase 3 expression was decreased, the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway was activated, and through this way, Gas6/Axl showed an anti-apoptotic effect and increased cell viability [31].

Axelrod and Pienta have reported that Axl plays a critical role in immune system response and cancer. They have suggested that Axl is generally expressed at higher levels in the disease state compared to normal tissue, and therefore it has an oncogenic role for the receptor [32].

In addition to the Gas6-dependent activation, Axl has been shown to have ligand-independent activation. In breast cancer cells, activation of Axl has been reported to occur via NF-kB of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) [33].

In this research, there was a significant decrease in Gas6 and Axl levels after metformin and metformin-insulin combination treatment in Met or Met + Ins groups. When all groups compared each other six months after treatment, only Axl levels were found to be significant. This may be due to the increased expression of Axl independent of its ligand.

The antitumorigenic potential of metformin has been tested in clinical trials in the treatment of several cancer types [34]. Kim et al. reported that metformin inhibited Axl and Tyro3 expression, resulting in antiproliferative activity in chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer cells. They reported that one of the therapeutic effects of metformin was to control the proliferation and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer cells by decreasing Axl and Tyro3 activation [35].

Saito et al. have reported that metformin reduces the proliferation of leukemia cells, inhibits Axl, and down-regulates other TAM receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK). They have also shown that metformin enhances the effect of doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic drug [36].

In this study, in the groups not receiving metformin treatment (control group and DER group), there were no statistically significant differences in serum Gas6, Axl, and sAxl values at the 6th month compared to the baseline. However, a statistically significant decrease was found in serum Gas6 and Axl values in the Met group and Met + Ins group at 6 months compared to the baseline. According to this result, it was observed that the use of metformin decreased Gas6/Axl levels, while at the same time, this effect continued with the use of insulin.

sAxl, which binds Gas6, functions as a “decoy receptor” that eliminates the Axl signal and the mitogenic effects caused by Gas6. In this study, no statistically significant differences were observed in serum sAxl values. This may be because Gas6 binds at levels similar to sAxl which acts as the decoy receptor. Accordingly, the reason for the significant difference only in Axl levels in the evaluation of parameters between groups may have been caused by the binding of Gas6 to sAxl [12].

Six months after the treatment, a significant decrease was observed in FBG and HbA1c values in the Met and Met + Ins groups, but there was no statistical difference in the control and DER groups. There was also a decrease in Gas6 and Axl values in the Met and Met + Ins groups. However, it was found that the 0th and 6th months FBG and HbA1c levels of the study groups did not significantly correlate with the corresponding Gas6, Axl, and sAxl parameters.

When the groups that did not use drugs were examined, a highly significant positive correlation was found between Gas6 and Axl, and a moderate statistically significant positive correlation was found for sAxl. A moderate positive correlation was found between Axl and sAxl, while a significant moderate positive correlation was found between Gas6 and Axl in the Met group using metformin for six months. In the Met + Ins group, which used insulin combined with metformin, a significant moderate positive correlation was found between Axl and sAxl. Within the groups, Gas6 and Axl levels were found to be decreased in Met and Met + Ins groups due to drug use. However, the decrease in Axl levels in the groups may be due to the small sample size and the individual differences (AA, AG, GG polymorphism) of our sample group. In this study, the possible mechanisms of glucose intolerance and changes in the Gas6/Axl pathway with the use of metformin in patients with T2DM were investigated. As a result of this study, blood glucose levels were found to be regulated with the use of metformin, and the Gas6/Axl pathway was shown to be inhibited. In addition, while metformin regulates insulin resistance, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, a new function has been added to its pleiotropic effects: Inhibitory effect on the Gas6/Axl pathway. In conclusion, these results suggest that the use of metformin can be effective in reducing cancer cases or potential cancer cases in people with T2DM, and it can be used for a better prognosis. Considering the increasing rate of diabetic cases and the cancer incidence in these cases, documenting the importance of metformin will be very useful for investigations involving diabetic cases associated with various cancer types.

This study has some limitations: Patients with T2DM who had chronic diseases (hypertension, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease) other than T2DM, diabetes duration exceeds 15 years (HbA1c≥5.7%), who smoked, and who used alcohol were not included in the study. In particular, drug-using groups were formed from patients who would just start the drug for treatment. Patients who refused treatment sometime after the onset of treatment were excluded from the study. In addition, T2DM patients treated with other drugs (SGLT/Incretin-based therapies) were also excluded. These exclusions caused the sample size to be small.

Conclusions

Metformin is a widely used pharmacological agent for the treatment of T2DM. Patients with diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of susceptibility to cancer. Blood glucose levels were found to be regulated with the use of metformin, and the Gas6/Axl pathway was shown to be inhibited. While metformin regulates insulin resistance, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, a new function has been added to its pleiotropic effects: inhibitory effect on the Gas6/Axl pathway. The use of metformin can be effective in reducing cancer cases or potential cancer cases in people with T2DM, and it can be used for a better prognosis.


Corresponding author: Yasemin Atici, Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Lokman Hekim University, Söğütözü Mh. 2179 Cd. No: 6, 06510, Ankara, Turkey, E-mail:

Funding source: Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Unit

Award Identifier / Grant number: TDK-2019-8810

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to say thanks to Amir Hussein Abedi for his help in sample collection from patients. Endless thanks to Merve Özel and Neslihan Sungur who helped in the laboratory studies.

  1. Research funding: This study was supported by Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Unit (No: TDK-2019-8810).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Non applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was conducted with the approval of Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2018/370).

References

1. Diabetes atlas [Online], 9th ed. 2021. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_IDFATLAS9e-final-web.pdf [Accessed 16 Apr 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

2. Standards of medical care in diabetes centered on evolving evidence, technology, and individualized care [Online]; 2021. Available from: https://www.diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/2020/ADA-releases-2021-standards-of-medical-care-in-diabetes [Accessed 10 Aug 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

3. European Association for the Study of Diabetes. 56th EASD annual meeting of the European association for the study of diabetes. Diabetologia 2020;63:1–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05221-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. The society of endocrinology and metabolism of Turkey (SEMT). Clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of diabetes mellitus and its complications - 2019. The Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism of Turkey (SEMT); 2019, Turkey.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Piskovatska, V, Stefanyshyn, N, Storey, KB, Vaiserman, AM, Lushchak, O. Metformin as a geroprotector: experimental and clinical evidence. Biogerontology 2019;20:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-018-9773-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Zhou, J, Massey, S, Story, D, Li, L. Metformin: an old drug with new applications. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102863.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Kelestimur, F, Ünlühizarci, K, Bayram, F, Sahin, Y, Tutus, A. Metformin and polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 2000;52:244–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.0945a.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Saraei, P, Asadi, I, Kakar, MA, Moradi-Kor, N. The beneficial effects of metformin on cancer prevention and therapy: a comprehensive review of recent advances. Cancer Manag Res 2019;11:3295. https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s200059.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Saini, N, Yang, X. Metformin as an anti-cancer agent: actions and mechanisms targeting cancer stem cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 2018;50:133–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmx106.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Tsou, W-I, Nguyen, K-QN, Calarese, DA, Garforth, SJ, Antes, AL, Smirnov, SV, et al.. Receptor tyrosine kinases, TYRO3, AXL, and MER, demonstrate distinct patterns and complex regulation of ligand-induced activation. J Biol Chem 2014;289:25750–63. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m114.569020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Gay, CM, Balaji, K, Byers, LA. Giving AXL the axe: targeting AXL in human malignancy. Br J Cancer 2017;116:415–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.428.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Kariolis, MS, Miao, YR, Jones, DS, Kapur, S, MathewsII, Giaccia, AJ, et al.. An engineered Axl’decoy receptor effectively silences the Gas6-Axl signaling axis. Nat Chem Biol 2014;10:977–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1636.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Budagian, V, Bulanova, E, Orinska, Z, Duitman, E, Brandt, K, Ludwig, A, et al.. Soluble Axl is generated by ADAM10-dependent cleavage and associates with Gas6 in mouse serum. Mol Cell Biol 2005;25:9324–39. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.25.21.9324-9339.2005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Ekman, C, Stenhoff, J, Dahlback, B. Gas6 is complexed to the soluble tyrosine kinase receptor Axl in human blood. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:838–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03752.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Lee, CH, Changchien, CY, Hung, YJ. Targeting inflammation in type 2 diabetes by antibody-mediated Tyro-3, Axl, Mer receptor activation. Wiley Online Library 2015;6:491–4.10.1111/jdi.12351Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Van der Meer, JH, van der Poll, T, van ‘t Veer, C. TAM receptors, Gas6, and protein S: roles in inflammation and hemostasis. Blood. Am J Hematol 2014;123:2460–9. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-09-528752.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Viollet, B, Guigas, B, Garcia, NS, Leclerc, J, Foretz, M, Andreelli, F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: an overview. Clin Sci 2012;122:253–70. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs20110386.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Lega, IC, Lipscombe, LL. Diabetes, obesity, and cancer—pathophysiology and clinical implications. Endocr Rev 2020;41:33–52. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnz014.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Scully, T, Ettela, A, LeRoith, D, Gallagher, EJ. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cancer risk. Front Oncol 2021;10:615375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.615375.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Shlomai, G, Neel, B, LeRoith, D, Gallagher, EJ. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer: the role of pharmacotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:4261–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.67.4044.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Madsen, KS, Kähler, P, Kähler, LKA, Madsbad, S, Gnesin, F, Metzendorf, MI, et al.. Metformin and second or third-generation sulphonylurea combination therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4:CD012368. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012368.pub2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Chawla, R, Madhu, S, Makkar, B, Ghosh, S, Saboo, B, Kalra, S. RSSDI-ESI clinical practice recommendations for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus 2020. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2020;24:1–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-020-00819-2.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Morales, DR, Morris, AD. Metformin in cancer treatment and prevention. Annu Rev Med 2015;66:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-062613-093128.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Mallik, R, Chowdhury, TA. Metformin in cancer. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;143:409–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.023.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Evans, JM, Donnelly, LA, Emslie-Smith, AM, Alessi, DR, Morris, AD. Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ 2005;330:1304–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38415.708634.f7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Zhu, C, Wei, Y, Wei, X. AXL receptor tyrosine kinase as a promising anti-cancer approach: functions, molecular mechanisms, and clinical applications. Mol Cancer 2019;18:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-1090-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Dihingia, A, Kalita, J, Manna, P. Implication of a novel Gla-containing protein, Gas6 in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, impaired glucose homeostasis, and inflammation: a review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017;128:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.026.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Hung, YJ, Lee, CH, Chu, NF, Shieh, YS. Plasma protein growth arrest–specific 6 levels are associated with altered glucose tolerance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1840–4. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1073.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Kuo, FC, Hung, YJ, Shieh, YS, Hsieh, CH, Hsiao, FC, Lee, CH. The levels of plasma growth arrest-specific protein 6 is associated with insulin sensitivity and inflammation in women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:304–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.057.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Lee, C-H, Chu, N-F, Shieh, Y-S, Hung, Y-J. The growth arrest-specific 6 (Gas6) gene polymorphism c.834+7G>A is associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;95:201–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Cavet, ME, Smolock, EM, Ozturk, OH, World, C, Pang, J, Konishi, A, et al.. Gas6–Axl receptor signaling is regulated by glucose in vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc 2008;28:886–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.108.162693.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Axelrod, H, Pienta, KJ. Axl as a mediator of cellular growth and survival. Oncotarget 2014;5:8818–52. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2422.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Tai, K, Shieh, Y, Lee, C, Shiah, S, Wu, C-W. Axl promotes cell invasion by inducing MMP-9 activity through activation of NF-κB and Brg-1. Oncogene 2008;27:4044–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.57.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Ikhlas, S, Ahmad, M. Metformin: insights into its anticancer potential with special reference to AMPK dependent and independent pathways. Life Sci 2017;185:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2017.07.029.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Kim, N-Y, Lee, H-Y, Lee, C. Metformin targets Axl and Tyro3 receptor tyrosine kinases to inhibit cell proliferation and overcome chemoresistance in ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol 2015;47:353–60. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Saito, T, Itoh, M, Tohda, S. Metformin suppresses the growth of leukemia cells partly through downregulation of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase. Leukemia Res 2020;94:106383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2020.106383.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-01-11
Accepted: 2022-04-11
Published Online: 2022-05-02

© 2022 Yasemin Atici et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review Article
  3. The implication of molecular markers in the early stage diagnosis of colorectal cancers and precancerous lesions
  4. Research Articles
  5. What are the predominant parameters for Down syndrome risk estimation in first-trimester screening: a data mining study
  6. Comparison between liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and immunoassay methods for measurement of plasma 25 (OH) vitamin D
  7. Comparison of Barricor tube and serum separator tube in outpatients
  8. Effect of hemoglobin, triglyceride, and urea in different concentrations on compatibility between methods used in HbA1c measurement
  9. Evaluation of hemolysis interference and possible protective effect of N-phenyl maleimide on the measurement of small peptides
  10. Neuroprotective and metabotropic effect of aerobic exercise training in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  11. Serum asprosin levels in patients with retinopathy of prematurity
  12. Neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratios as a biomarker in postoperative wound infections
  13. Relationship between dental caries and saliva’s visfatin levels, total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and total oxidant status (TOS)
  14. Might periostin serve as a marker of bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?
  15. A new approach for the pleiotropic effect of metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus
  16. IGFBP7 is a predictor of diuretic-induced acute kidney injury in the patients with acute decompensated heart failure
  17. Serum vitamin D receptor and fibroblast growth factor-23 levels in postmenopausal primary knee osteoarthritis patients
  18. Antioxidant activity of ethanol extract and fractions of Piper crocatum with Rancimat and cuprac methods
  19. Lycorine impedes 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene exposed hamster oral carcinogenesis through P13K/Akt and NF-κB inhibition
  20. Sublethal effects of acrylamide on thyroid hormones, complete blood count and micronucleus frequency of vertebrate model organism (Cyprinus carpio)
  21. Acknowledgment
  22. Acknowledgment
Heruntergeladen am 6.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2022-0013/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen