Startseite Should Age Discrimination Be an Integral Part of Employment Discrimination Law?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Should Age Discrimination Be an Integral Part of Employment Discrimination Law?

  • Lilach Lurie
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Februar 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This Article argues that a universal approach to age discrimination promotes justice (including intergenerational justice) and efficiency. As explained herein, legal regimes regulate age discrimination in employment in various ways. While some regimes create specific anti–age discrimination legislation, others ban most kinds of employment discrimination, including age discrimination, in a general way. These latter promote a universal approach to age discrimination. The current Article explores the theoretical justifications for either a particularistic or a universal approach to age discrimination. Additionally, it enriches its theoretical discussion by taking and presenting a snapshot of current litigation in Israel – a country that has adopted a universal approach to age discrimination.


* Lilach Lurie is a lecturer at Tel Aviv University, Department of Labor Studies and a faculty member at the Herczeg Institute on Aging. This study was supported by the National Insurance Institute of Israel, Grant 14424. I would like to thank Pnina Alon–Shenker, Bradley A. Areheart, Alexander A. Boni–Saenz, Stephanie Bornstein, Goni Blumenfeld, Hanoch Dagan, Avihay Dorfman, Israel Doron, Alon Jasper, Daphna Hacker, Nina Kohn, Therese MacDermott, Sagit Mor, Fusako Seki, Yofi Tirosh, Limor Tshuva, and Jamillah Williams for helpful comments on drafts and for fruitful discussions. I presented drafts of this paper at the following workshops and conferences: Law and Society Conference (Toronto, 2018); International Conference: Elder Law and Its Discontents (Tel Aviv, 2018); Private Law Theory Workshop (Tel Aviv, 2019). I thank all participants for helpful comments. I wish to thank Reem Assadi, Michal Geist and Liraz Hemo for excellent research assistance. Ruvik Danieli translated all quotations from Israeli legislation and from Israeli court decisions throughout the Article.

Cite as: Lilach Lurie, Should Age Discrimination Be an Integral Part of Employment Discrimination Law?, 21 THEORETICAL INQUIRIES L. 103 (2020).


Appendix A

Types of Legal Regimes

I II III
No Prohibition on Age Discrimination Specific Anti–Age Discrimination Prohibition A General Ban on all Kinds of Employment Discrimination
A No Prohibition of Age Discrimination (Past)
B A Weaker Protection against Age Discrimination US EU
C Same Protection against kinds of all Discrimination Israel
Appendix B

Expansion of the Protected Groups

Year Law Prohibited discrimination cause of action
1981 Equal Employment Opportunity Law, in 5741–1981 Gender, marriage, parenthood
1988 Equal Law, 5748Opportunities –1988 at Work Gender, marriage, parenthood
+1992 Equal Opportunities at Work Law, (amendment) 5752–1992 Personal status, sexual orientation
1995 Equal Opportunities at Work Law, (amendment no. 3) 5755–1995 Age, race, religion, nationality, country of origin, outlook or party
1997 Equal Opportunities at Work Law, (amendment no. 4) 5758–1997 Duration of reservist service
1998 Equal Rights for People with Disabilities Law, 5758–1998, § 8 Disabilities
2001 Equal Opportunities at Work Law, (amendment no. 8) 5762–2001 Reservist service
2004 Equal Opportunities at Work Law, (amendment no. 9) 5764–2004 Pregnancy
2007 Equal Opportunities at Work Law, (amendment no. 11) 5767–2007 Fertility treatments, extracorporeal fertilization treatments
2014 Equal Opportunities at Work Law, (amendment no. 22), 5775–2014 Place of residence
Published Online: 2020-02-26
Published in Print: 2020-02-26

© 2020 by Theoretical Inquiries in Law

Heruntergeladen am 26.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/til-2020-0006/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen