Startseite Exclusion: Property Analogies in the Immigration Debate
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Exclusion: Property Analogies in the Immigration Debate

  • Jeremy Waldron
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Juli 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

By what right do sovereign states prohibit migrants from entering their territories? It cannot be assumed that they do, certainly not as a matter of the way we define “sovereignty.” Can the sovereign right to exclude immigrants be derived from the sovereign’s status as owner of the territory it controls? This Article shows that the idea of the sovereign as owner is too problematic to be the basis of any argument for the right to exclude. It also argues against the proposition that communities, considered as informal sovereigns, have a right to exclude based on their communal property in the land they inhabit. In both cases, an “ownership conception” is distinguished from a more attractive “responsibility conception” of sovereignty. The former remains unclear, while the latter leaves open the question of who the sovereign (state or community) is responsible for.


* University Professor, New York University School of Law. This Article, presented at the Sovereignty and Property Conference at Columbia Law School in September 2015, grew out of an earlier piece, Immigration: A Lockean Approach, presented in May 2015 at a conference in Oxford to mark the retirement of Professor David Miller. The earlier paper is available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2652710. I am grateful to all who gave comments on both occasions (and also at a summer workshop at NYU).


Published Online: 2017-7-26

© 2017 by Theoretical Inquiries in Law

Heruntergeladen am 26.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/til-2017-0021/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen