A contrastive study of engagement resources between English spoken and written texts
-
Yang Yang
Abstract
Engagement can be used to describe and explain the various styles or strategies of intersubjective positioning that have been observed operating recurrently within different discourse domains. Based on the engagement system of appraisal framework, this study offers a contrastive analysis of dialogic contraction and dialogic expansion between English spoken and written texts. Thirty TV interviews and 30 news reports, each with a length of 1500–2000 words, were compared in terms of the distribution pattern and the quantitative use of engagement resources. The findings show that the English spoken and written texts are generally different in the distribution pattern of engagement resources. More specifically, in the spoken texts the contractive devices are much more prominent than the expansive devices while in the written texts the expansive devices are used slightly more frequently than the contractive devices. As for the quantitative use, most of the frequencies of dialogic contraction and dialogic expansion in the spoken texts are significantly different from those in the written texts, except endorsement and distance. This study may provide a new perspective for the contrastive study of spoken and written languages. The findings may also provide some pedagogical implications, especially for the teaching and learning of oral and written English.
Acknowledgments
I express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Yuchen Xu, for his guidance of my Master’s thesis, on which this article is based. I would also like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments and suggestions.
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech genres and other later essays (translated by Vern W. McGee). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Becker, Annette. 2009. Modality and engagement in British and German political interviews. Languages in Contrast 9(1). 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.9.1.02bec.Suche in Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika, HelenCaple, , 2014. Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analyzing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond. Discourse & Society 25(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516041.Suche in Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, Hong. 2003. A stylistic study of English news interview. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching (3). 12–14. https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.002698.Suche in Google Scholar
Dai, Shulan. 2008. The discourse characteristic of TV interview. Journal of Yangzhou University 12(1). 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848303.Suche in Google Scholar
Dong, Dan. 2019. A positive discourse analysis of Italy’s mainstream media’s attitudes towards the 19th NCCPC from the perspective of appraisal theory. Foreign Language and Literature 35(4). 17–23.Suche in Google Scholar
Fu, Yao. 2015. Appraisal system: Theories and practices. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1989. Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2015. Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies 12(3). 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013479.Suche in Google Scholar
Ho, Janet, 2016. When bank stocks are hobbled by worries: A metaphor study of emotions in the financial news reports. Text & Talk 36(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0014.Suche in Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chia-Ling, 2008. Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports: Subjectivity/objectivity as a factor. Discourse Studies 10(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087009.Suche in Google Scholar
Huan, Changpeng. 2016. Journalistic engagement patterns and power relations: Corpus evidence from Chinese and Australian hard news reporting. Discourse & Communication 18(2). 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315611239.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Guowen & Haiqing Liao. 2008. A systemic functional analysis of television interviews. Foreign Languages Research (4). 1–9.Suche in Google Scholar
Jiang, Yue, Lu, Li, 2010. An analysis of the power relationship of vague language construction in English TV interview program. Foreign Language Education 31(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2010.01.016.Suche in Google Scholar
Jullian, Paula M., 2011. Appraising through someone else’s words: The evaluative power of quotations in news reports. Discourse & Society 22(6), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511411697.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Jun, DeluZhang, , 2010. A research on the prosodic pattern of engagement features in TV news interviews. Foreign Language Education 31(4), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2010.04.027.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Lihua. 2010. Research on appraisal theory. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Junhong, 2016. First personal pronoun as marked discourse strategy and the difference of cultural identity construction: A corpus-based study of discourses by Chinese and American TV interview hosts. Foreign Languages in China 13(5), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2016.05.006.Suche in Google Scholar
Lu, Jiaojiao. 2018. A comparative study of China and Germany news climate change discourse from the perspective of ecolinguistics. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing 34(6). 33–42.Suche in Google Scholar
Ma, Jingxiu. 2008. The rhetoric-appraisal mechanism of direct quotations in news discourse. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice (4). 77–81.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal system in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London & New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Continuum.10.1057/9780230511910Suche in Google Scholar
O’Connell, Daniel C, Sabine Kowal, Edward, J. D., III., 2004. Dialogicality in TV news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 36(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.06.001.Suche in Google Scholar
O’Mara⁃Shimek, Michael, ManuelGuillén⁃Parra, , AnaOrtega⁃Larrea, , 2015. Stop the bleeding or weather the storm? Crisis solution marketing and the ideological use of metaphor in online financial reporting of the stock market crash of 2008 at the New York Stock Exchange. Discourse & Communication 9(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314556047.Suche in Google Scholar
Pan, Yanyan. 2019. An analysis of military news reports from the perspective of multimodal cognitive criticism. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 42(5). 22–30.Suche in Google Scholar
Pang, Jixian & Mingyao Chen. 2006. Interpersonal functions of engagement markers in TV interviews. Journal of Zhejiang University 36(3). 125–130.Suche in Google Scholar
Pounds, Gabrina. 2010. Attitude and subjectivity in Italian and British hard-news reporting: The construction of a culture-specific ‘reporter’ voice. Discourse Studies 12(1):106–137.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609346777.Suche in Google Scholar
Ran, Yongping, NaYang, , 2017. The pragmatic analysis of stance-taking in interview discourse. Foreign Language Education 38(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2017.01.009.Suche in Google Scholar
Smolka, Vladislav. 2011. Word-order variability and FSP in written and spoken discourse. Linguistica Pragensia 21(1). 14–23. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10017-011-0002-1.Suche in Google Scholar
1996 Thompson, Geoff. 1996. Introducing functional grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1995. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, Bakhtinian Thought-an Introductory Reader. Simon Dentith, Ladislav Matejka & Irwin R. Titunik (trans.). London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Yuchen, 2015. The semantic perspective of the appraisal function of modality. Foreign Language Education 36(3), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2015.03.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Yuchen, Xuan Yan & Rui Su. 2010. A study on appraisal system in scientific discourse. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Yang, Yang. 2018. Ecological discourse analysis of news reports from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Beijing International Studies University (1). 33–45. https://doi.org/10.12002/j.bisu.138.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- The voiceless in The Voice: A multimodal critical discourse analysis
- Gestures of closure: A small stories approach to museumgoers' texts
- A contrastive study of engagement resources between English spoken and written texts
- Curative or beauty treatment? Language and manipulation in leaflets of medical devices
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- The voiceless in The Voice: A multimodal critical discourse analysis
- Gestures of closure: A small stories approach to museumgoers' texts
- A contrastive study of engagement resources between English spoken and written texts
- Curative or beauty treatment? Language and manipulation in leaflets of medical devices
