Abstract:
The study explores Hellenistic readers’ reception of archaic and classical lyric poetry by using Pindar’s dithyrambs as a representative test case. The ‘horizons of expectations’ in the Hellenistic era, it is argued, were influenced not only by ancient lyric poetry per se but also by the commentaries that accompanied the lyric corpora, by Hellenistic theorizing about the voice and by writers such as Dionysius of Hallicarnassus and Callimachus. The experience of attending to Pindar’s ‘vocal poetics’ is characterized both by intense imaginative transport and a recognition of the reader’s experiential finitude.
Bibliography
Acosta-Hughes, B. / Stephens, S. (2002), “Rereading Callimachus’ Aetia Fragment 1”, in: CPh 97.3, 238–55.10.1086/449586Suche in Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. / Stephens, S. (2012), Callimachus in Context, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511919992Suche in Google Scholar
Asper, M. (1997), Onomata allotria: zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos, Stuttgart.Suche in Google Scholar
Badiou, A. (2013a), Philosophy and the Event, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar
Badiou, A. (2013b), The Age of the Poets, London-New York.Suche in Google Scholar
Bakker, E. (2005), Pointing to the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics, Washington, DC-Cambridge, MA.Suche in Google Scholar
Beardsley, M. (1982), “Aesthetic Experience”, in: M. Wreen / D. Callen (eds.), The Aesthetic Point of View: Selected Essays, Ithaca-London, 285–297.Suche in Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1993), “Impersonation of Voice in Callimachus’ Hymn to Apollo”, in: TAPhA 123, 181–198.10.2307/284328Suche in Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (2013), “Greek Festival Choruses In and Out of Context”, in: J. Billings / F. Budelmann / F. Macintosh (eds.), Choruses Ancient and Modern, Oxford, 81–98.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670574.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar
Butler, S. (2015), The Ancient Phonograph, New York.10.2307/j.ctv14gpj13Suche in Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2013), “The Dithyramb, a Dionysiac Poetic Form: Genre Rules and Cultic Contexts”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 332–352.Suche in Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1995), Callimachus and His Critics, Princeton.10.1515/9781400887422Suche in Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. (2013), “Cyclic Choroi and the Dithyramb in the Classical and Hellenistic period: a Problem of Definition”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 153–170.Suche in Google Scholar
Chaouli, M. (2013), “Criticism and Style”, in: New Literary History 44, 323–344.10.1353/nlh.2013.0022Suche in Google Scholar
Culler, J. (2015), Theory of the Lyric, Cambridge, MA-London.10.4159/9780674425781Suche in Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G.B. (2004), “Past Future and Present Past: Temporal Deixis in Archaic Greek Lyric”, in: Arethusa 37, 267–294.10.1353/are.2004.0020Suche in Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. (1997), “How the Dithyramb Got Its Shape”, in: CQ 47.2, 331–351.10.1093/cq/47.2.331Suche in Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. (2007), “The Sound of Mousikē: Reflections on Aural Change in Ancient Greece”, in: R. Osborne (ed.), Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Politics 430–380 BC, Cambridge, 288–300.Suche in Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. (2013), “Music and Movement in the Dithyramb”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 198–209.Suche in Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. (2008), Between Rhetoric and Grammar: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics, and Literature, Leiden.10.1163/ej.9789004166776.i-456Suche in Google Scholar
Depew, M. (1993), “Mimesis and Aetiology in Callimachus’ Hymns”, in: M. Harder / R. Regtuit / G.C. Wakker (eds.), Callimachus, Groningen, 57–77.10.4324/9780203055922-6Suche in Google Scholar
Dolar, M. (2006), A Voice and Nothing More, Cambridge, MA-London.10.7551/mitpress/7137.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2005), “Interpreting Sacrifical Ritual in Roman Poetry”, in: A. Barchiesi / J. Rüpke / S. Stephens (eds.), Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome Held at Stanford University in February 2002, Stuttgart, 1–21.Suche in Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016), Beyond Greek: the Beginnings of Latin Literature, Cambridge, MA.10.4159/9780674496026Suche in Google Scholar
Felski, R. (2015), The Limits of Critique, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226294179.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1990), Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction, Austin.10.7560/780903Suche in Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1973), Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy: A History of Greek Epic, Lyric, and Prose to the Middle of the Fifth Century, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Freis, R. (1983), “The Catalogue of Pindaric Genres in Horace Ode 4.2”, in: ClA 2, 27–36.10.2307/25010780Suche in Google Scholar
Furley, W. / Bremer, J. (eds.) (2001), Greek Hymns: Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period, Tübingen.Suche in Google Scholar
Gurd, S. (2016), Dissonance: Auditory Aesthetics in Ancient Greece, Fordham.10.5422/fordham/9780823269655.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011), Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570560.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Harder, A. (ed.) (2012), Callimachus, Aetia: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2015), “A Dithyramb for Augustus: Horace, Odes 4.2”, in: CQ 65.1, 253–285.10.1017/S0009838814000597Suche in Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2013), “The Semantics of Processional Dithyramb: Pindar’s Second Dithyramb and Archaic Athenian Vase-Painting”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 171–197.Suche in Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2014), Hesiodic Voices, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781107110816Suche in Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2013), “‘One Who is Fought over by All the Tribes”: The Dithyrambic Poet and the City of Athens”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 368–386.Suche in Google Scholar
Ihde, D. (2003), “Auditory Imagination”, in: M. Bull / L. Back (eds.), The Auditory Culture Reader, Oxford, 61–66.10.1007/978-94-017-4447-8_10Suche in Google Scholar
Janko, R. (ed.) (2000), Philodemus, On Poems, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2014), “Archaizing and Classicism in the Literary Historical Thought of Dionysius of Halicarnassus”, in: J. Ker / C. Pieper (eds.), Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, Leiden-Boston, 357–387.Suche in Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. / Wilson, P. (2013), “The World of Dithyramb”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 1–27.Suche in Google Scholar
Lavecchia, S. (ed.) (2000), Pindari dityramborum fragmenta, Roma.Suche in Google Scholar
Lavecchia, S. (2013), “Becoming like Dionysos: Dithyramb and Dionysian Initiation”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 59–75.Suche in Google Scholar
Maslov, B. (2015), Pindar and the Emergence of Literature, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781316337707Suche in Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (2010), Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554188.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Morrison, A. (2007), The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511597343Suche in Google Scholar
Morrison, A. (2012), “Performance, re–performance, and Pindar’s audiences”, in: P. Agócs / C. Carey / R. Rawles (eds.), Reading the Victory Ode, Cambridge, 111–133.10.1017/CBO9781139017626.011Suche in Google Scholar
Neer, R. / Kurke, L. (2014), “Pindar Fr. 75 SM and the Politics of Athenian Space”, in: GRBS 54, 527–579.Suche in Google Scholar
Newman, J. (1985), “Pindar and Callimachus”, in: ICS 10, 169–189.Suche in Google Scholar
Nowell Smith, D. (2015), On Voice in Poetry: The Work of Animation, Basingstoke.10.1057/9781137308238Suche in Google Scholar
Payne, M. (2007), “Ideas in Lyric Communication: Pindar and Paul Celan”, in: Modern Philology 105.1, 5–20.10.1086/587193Suche in Google Scholar
Phillips, T. (2014), “Between Pindar and Sappho: Horace Od. 4.2.9–12”, in: Mnemosyne 67.3, 466–474.10.1163/1568525X-12341340Suche in Google Scholar
Phillips, T. (2016), Pindar’s Library: Performance Poetry and Material Texts, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745730.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2007), “Pindar, Lasos, and the Riddle of S”, in: CQ 57.1, 1–21.Suche in Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2009), “Rhetoric, Aesthetics, and the Voice”, in: E. Gunderson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, Cambridge, 92–108.10.1017/CCOL9780521860543.007Suche in Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2010), The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2013), “Why Are There Nine Muses?”, in: S. Butler / E. Purves (eds.), Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses, Durham, 9–26.Suche in Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2016), The Sublime in Antiquity, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139775304Suche in Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. (2006), Singing Alexandria: Music Between Practice and Textual Transmission, Leiden-Boston.10.1163/9789047408970Suche in Google Scholar
Richardson, N. (1986), “Pindar and Later Literary Criticism”, in: PLLS 5, 383–401.Suche in Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (ed.) (2001), Pindar’s Paeans. A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2013), “Dithyrambos, Thriambos, Triumphus: Dionysiac Discourse at Rome”, in: B. Kowalzig / P. Wilson (eds.), Dithyramb in Context, Oxford, 409–423.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwindt, J.P. (2009), “Thaumatographia, or ‘What is a Theme’”, in: P. Hardie (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture, Oxford, 145–162.Suche in Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2007), “Feathers Flying: Avian Poetics in Hesiod, Pindar, and Callimachus”, in: AJP 128, 177–208.10.1353/ajp.2007.0031Suche in Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2015), “The Poetics of Sound: Callimachus’ Rereading of Pindar Fragment 70B S.-M.”, in: CPh 110, 99–123.10.1086/680660Suche in Google Scholar
Stephens, S. (ed.) (2015a), Callimachus, The Hymns, Oxford-New York.Suche in Google Scholar
Stephens, S. (2015b), “Callimachus and His Narrators”, in: A. Faulkner / O. Hodkinson (eds.), Hymnic Narrative and the Narratology of Greek Hymns, Leiden, 49–68.10.1163/9789004289512_005Suche in Google Scholar
Stewart, S. (2002), Poetry and the Fate of the Senses, Chicago.Suche in Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (ed.) (2011), Horace, Odes IV and Carmen Saeculare, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar
van der Weiden, M. (ed.) (1991), The Dithyrambs of Pindar, Amsterdam.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, F. (ed.) (1978), Callimachus, Hymn to Apollo, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (2003), “The Politics of Dance: Dithyrambic Contest and Social Order in Ancient Greece”, in: D. Phillips / D. Pritchard (eds.), Sport and Festival in the Ancient Greek World, Swansea, 163–196.10.2307/j.ctv1n357mz.10Suche in Google Scholar
Article Note
I am grateful to David Fearn, Tim Rood, and Evina Sistakou for their comments on drafts of this chapter. All translations are my own.
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Introduction
- Callimachean ‘Lyric’
- ‘Lyric’ Atmosphere in Apollonius Rhodius and Callimachus (With an Analysis of Theocritus 18)
- Theocritus’ Idylls: On the Verge of Modern Lyric
- Lyricism in Hellenistic Epigram
- Lyric for the Rulers, Lyric for the People: The Transformation of Some Lyric Subgenres in Hellenistic Poetry
- Melos and Molpe in Hellenistic Poetry
- Pindar’s Dithyrambs and Their Hellenistic Reception
- List of Contributors
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Introduction
- Callimachean ‘Lyric’
- ‘Lyric’ Atmosphere in Apollonius Rhodius and Callimachus (With an Analysis of Theocritus 18)
- Theocritus’ Idylls: On the Verge of Modern Lyric
- Lyricism in Hellenistic Epigram
- Lyric for the Rulers, Lyric for the People: The Transformation of Some Lyric Subgenres in Hellenistic Poetry
- Melos and Molpe in Hellenistic Poetry
- Pindar’s Dithyrambs and Their Hellenistic Reception
- List of Contributors