Startseite Covid-19: A Trade-off between Political Economy and Ethics
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Covid-19: A Trade-off between Political Economy and Ethics

  • Henrique Schneider ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Juli 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper investigates the trade-off between economics and ethics applying them to “lockdowns” as a policy measure to counter the Covid-19-pandemic. This is an academic research on the nature and mechanism of trade-offs in so far as they apply to decision making. In the course of the line of inquiry pursued here, several different ways of trading off are assessed. In applying them to the pandemics, each yield a different answer to the adequacy of lockdowns as measures against the pandemic. The economic trade-off found “optimalcy” conditions, the utilitarian-ethical trade-off failed to do so revealing that there is a problem using “scientific evidence” as basis for such a trade-off. The value-ethical trade-off found out that lockdowns do not pass the test of proportionality within the usual constitutional framework.

JEL Classification: A11; D61; D80; I18

Corresponding author: Henrique Schneider, Nordakademie gAG, Elmshorn, Germany, E-mail:

References

Bendavid, E., C. Oh, J. Bhattacharya, and J. Ioannidis. 2020. “Assessing Mandatory Stay‐at‐Home and Business Closure Effects on the Spread of COVID‐19.” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 51 (4): e13484, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13484.Suche in Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, C. 2020. “Did Lockdown Work? An Economist’s Cross-Country Comparison.” CESifo ifab003, https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifab003.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonardi, J.-P., Q. Gallea, D. Kalanoski, and R. Lalive. 2020. “Fast and Local: How Did Lockdown Policies Affect the Spread and Severity of the Covid-19.” Covid Economics 23: 325–51.Suche in Google Scholar

Chapman, B. 2020. “Preference, Pluralism, and Proportionality.” University of Toronto Law Journal 60 (2): 177–96. 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, M., and I. Porat. 2013. Proportionality and Constitutional Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Currie, D. P. 1986. “Positive and Negative Constitutional Rights,” University of Chicago Law Review 53 (3): 864–902.Suche in Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. 2006. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Einboden, R. 2020. “SuperNurse? Troubling the Hero Discourse in COVID Times.” Health 24 (4): 343–7, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320934280.Suche in Google Scholar

Esfeld, M. 2020. Science and Human Freedom. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferguson, N. M., D. Laydon, and I. Namai. 2020. “Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand.” Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team publication, https://doi.org/10.25561/77482.Suche in Google Scholar

Gros, D. 2020. “The Great Lockdown: was it Worth it?” CEPS Policy Insights 2020-11. Center for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Suche in Google Scholar

Gross, O. 2003. “Providing for the Unexpected: Constitutional Emergency Provisions.” Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 33: 13–39, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023638728907.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, T., N. Angrist, R. Goldszmidt, B. Kira, A. Patherick, T. Phillips, S. Webster, E. Cameron-Blake, L. Hallas, S. Majumdar, and H. Tatlow. 2021. “A Global Panel Database of Pandemic Policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).” Nature Human Behaviour 51 (2): 529–38, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinarejos, A. 2020. “Next Generation EU: On the Agreement of a COVID-19 Recovery Package.” European Law Review 4 (2): 451–2.Suche in Google Scholar

Huremović, D. 2019. “Brief History of Pandemics (Pandemics throughout History).” In Psychiatry of Pandemics, edited by Damir Huremović, 7–35. Cham: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15346-5_2.Suche in Google Scholar

IMF. 2020. World Economic Outlook October 2020: A Long and Difficult Ascent. Washington: IMF.Suche in Google Scholar

Ioannidis, J. 2020. “Infection Fatality Rate of COVID-19 Inferred from Seroprevalence Data.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 99 (‎1)‎: 19–33.Suche in Google Scholar

Ioannidis, J., and C. Doucouliagos. 2013. “What’s to Know about the Credibility of Empirical Economics?” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (5): 997–1004, https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12032.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Y.-W., S.-J. Yoon, and I.-H. Oh. 2013. “The Economic Burden of the 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in Korea.” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 45 (5): 390–6, https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2012.749423.Suche in Google Scholar

König, M., and A. Winkler. 2021. “COVID-19: Lockdowns, Fatality Rates and GDP Growth.” Intereconomics 56 (1): 32–9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-0948-y.Suche in Google Scholar

Koppl, R. 2006. “Austrian Economics at the Cutting Edge.” The Review of Austrian Economics 19 (4): 231–41, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-9246-y.Suche in Google Scholar

Laborde, D., W. Martin, and R. Vos. 2021. “Impacts of COVID‐19 on Global Poverty, Food Security, and Diets: Insights from Global Model Scenario Analysis.” Agricultural Economics 52 (3): 375–90, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12624.Suche in Google Scholar

Lavoie, D. 1990. “Hermeneutics, Subjectivity, and the Lester/Machlup Debate: Toward a More Anthropological Approach to Empirical Economics.” In Economics as Discourse, edited by S. Warren, 167–87. Dordrecht: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1377-1_6.Suche in Google Scholar

LePan, N. 2020. A Visual History of Pandemics. Zurich: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/a-visual-history-of-pandemics (accessed March 1, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Lerner, R. 1994. Revolutions Revisited: Two Faces of the Politics of Enlightenment. Chapel Hill: Univ of North Carolina Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Locke, John. (1689) 1988. Two Treatises on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Maliszewska, M., A. Mattoo, and D. Van Der Mensbrugghe. 2020. “The Potential Impact of COVID-19 on GDP and Trade: A Preliminary Assessment.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 9211 (2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Miles, D. K., M. Stedman, and A. H. Heald. 2021. ““Stay at Home, Protect the National Health Service, Save Lives”: A Cost Benefit Analysis of the Lockdown in the United Kingdom.” International Journal of Clinical Practice 75 (3): e13674, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13674.Suche in Google Scholar

Molinari, N.-A., I. Ortega-Sanchez, M. Messonnier, W. Thompson, P. Wortley, E. Weintraub, and C. Bridges. 2007. “The Annual Impact of Seasonal Influenza in the US: Measuring Disease Burden and Costs.” Vaccine 25 (27): 5086–96, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.046.Suche in Google Scholar

Pasquini-Descomps, H., N. Brender, and D. Maradan. 2017. “Value for Money in H1N1 Influenza: A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Pandemic Interventions.” Value in Health 20 (6): 819–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Pestieau, P., and G. Ponthiere. 2020. “Optimal Lockdown and Social Welfare.” CESifo. Working Paper, No. 8694.Suche in Google Scholar

Raffelhüschen, B. 2020. “Verhältnismäßigkeit in der Pandemie: Geht das?” Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 49 (10): 33–7, https://doi.org/10.15358/0340-1650-2020-10-33.Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, H. 2020. “The Economic Cost of the Lockdown.” GIS Working Paper 2020-345. Geopolitical Information Service, working paper.Suche in Google Scholar

Sims, C. A. 1996. “Macroeconomics and Methodology.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1): 105–20.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. 2003. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics.” The American Economic Review 93 (3): 465–508, https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322156954.Suche in Google Scholar

Staddon, J. 2017. Scientific Method: How Science Works, Fails to Work, and Pretends to Work. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Vearrier, L., and C. M. Henderson. 2021. “Utilitarian Principlism as a Framework for Crisis Healthcare Ethics.” HEC Forum 33 (1): 45–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09431-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Weiss, C. 2003. “Expressing Scientific Uncertainty.” Law, Probability and Risk 2 (1): 25–46, https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/2.1.25.Suche in Google Scholar

Wicke, P., and M. M. Bolognesi. 2020. “Framing COVID-19: How We Conceptualize and Discuss the Pandemic on Twitter.” PloS One 15 (9): e0240010, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240010.Suche in Google Scholar

Zwitter, A. 2012. “The Rule of Law in Times of Crisis A Legal Theory on the State of Emergency in the Liberal Democracy.” Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosphie 98 (1): 95–111.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-01-01
Accepted: 2021-06-07
Published Online: 2021-07-08
Published in Print: 2021-12-20

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2021-0001/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen