Clues as information, the semiotic gap, and inferential investigative processes, or making a (very small) contribution to the new discipline, Forensic Semiotics

References

Bonfantini, Massimo & Giampaolo Proni. 1988. To guess or not to guess? In Umberto Eco & Thomas Sebeok (eds.), Dupin, Holmes, Peirce: The sign of three, 119–135. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Jennifer & Elizabeth Campbell (eds.). 2010. The Cambridge handbook of forensic psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511730290Suche in Google Scholar

Bryant, Robin P. 2009. Forms of reasoning and the analysis of intelligence in criminal investigation. In Stephen Tong, Robin P. Bryant & Miranda A. H. Horvath (eds.), Understanding criminal investigation, 35–67. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470682388.ch3Suche in Google Scholar

Canter, David. 2010. Investigative psychology. In Jennifer Brown & Elizabeth Campbell (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of forensic psychology, 81–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199550203.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2014. Signs of crime: Introducing forensic semiotics. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614513162Suche in Google Scholar

Gallie, Walther B. 1966. Peirce and pragmatism. Hardmondsworth: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Fahsing, Ivar. 2013. Effektivitet, dyder og krydspres i efterforskningen. In Camilla Hald & Kira V. Rønn (eds.), Om at opdage: Metodiske refleksioner over politiets undersøgelsespraksis, 115–147. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Suche in Google Scholar

Fisch, Max H. 1978. Peirce’s general theory of signs. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Sight, sound, and sense, 31–70. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fisette, Jean. 2007. Literary practice on the immediate horizon of the elaboration of semiotic: Peirce’s meeting with a few great authors. Semiotica 165(1/4). 67–89.10.1515/SEM.2007.033Suche in Google Scholar

Hald, Camilla & Kira V. Rønn. (eds.). 2014. Om at opdage: metodiske refleksioner over politiets undersøgelsespraksis. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Suche in Google Scholar

Harrowitz, Nancy. 1984. The body of the detective model: Charles S. Peirce and Edgar Allan Poe. In Umberto Eco & Thomas Sebeok (eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, 179–197. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Innes, Martin. 2007. Investigation order and major crime inquiries. In Tim Newburn, Tom Williamson & Alan Wright (eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation, 255–276. New York: Willan.Suche in Google Scholar

James, Stuart H., Jon J. Nordby & Suzanne Bell (eds.). 2002. Forensic science: An introduction to scientific and investigative techniques. Dayton: CRC Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Johansen, Jørgen D. 1993. Dialogic semiosis. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ketner, Kenneth L. & Christian J. W. Kloesel. 1986. Peirce, semeiotic, and pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. Bloomington: Indiana University. Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Liszka, James J. 1996. A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Newburn, Tim, Tom Williamson & Alan Wright (eds.). 2007. Handbook of criminal investigation. New York: Willan.Suche in Google Scholar

Osterburg, James W. & Richard H. Ward. 2000. Criminal investigation: A method for reconstructing the past. Cincinnati: Anderson.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1982–. Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 6 vols., M. Fisch, E. Moore & C. Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number.]Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Suche in Google Scholar

Ransdell, Joseph. 1979. The epistemic function of iconicity in perception (Peirce Studies 1). Lubbock: Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism.Suche in Google Scholar

Savan, David. 1987–1988. An introduction to Peirce’s full system of semiotic. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.Suche in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas & Jean-Umiker Sebeok. 1988. “You know my method”: A juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. In Umberto Eco & Thomas Sebeok (eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, 11–55. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Short, Thomas L. 2007. Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350Suche in Google Scholar

Sørensen, Bent, Torkild Thellefsen & Martin Thellefsen. 2014. Collateral experience as a prerequisite for signification. In Torkild Thellefsen & Bent Sørensen (eds.), Charles S. Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication and cognition, 557–560. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614516415.557Suche in Google Scholar

Taroni, Franco, Colin Aitken, Paolo Garbolino & Alex Biedermann. 2006. Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science. Oxford: John Wiley.10.1002/0470091754Suche in Google Scholar

Tong, Stephen & Ben Bowling. 2006 Art, craft, and detective work. Police Journal 79(4). 323–329.10.1350/pojo.2006.79.4.323Suche in Google Scholar

Tong, Stephen, Robin P. Bryant & Miranda A. H. Horvath. 2009. Criminal investigation in context. In Stephen Tong, Robin P. Bryant & Miranda A. H. Horvath (eds.), Understanding criminal investigation, 171–196. Oxford: John Wiley.10.1002/9780470682388.ch8Suche in Google Scholar

United Nations Office on Crime. 2011. Criminal intelligence – manual for analysts. New York: United Nations Office on Crime.Suche in Google Scholar

Vosk, Ted & Ashley Emery. 2014. Forensic metrology: Scientific measurement and inference for lawyers, judges, and criminalists. Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/b17462Suche in Google Scholar