The Impact of Behavioral Economics on the Law: Introduction

References

Amendola, K.L. and Wixted, J.T. (2015). Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of suspect identifications made by actual eyewitnesses from simultaneous and sequential lineups in a randomized field trial. J. Exp. Criminol. 11: 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9219-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, J.R. (2000). Learning and memory. An integrated approach. Wiley, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Suche in Google Scholar

Birmingham, R.L. (1970). Breach of contract, damage measures, and economic efficiency. Rutgers Law Rev. 24: 273–292.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolton, G.E. and Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 90: 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166.Suche in Google Scholar

Box, G.E.P. (1976). Science and statistics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71: 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949.Suche in Google Scholar

Bracht, G.H. and Glass, G.V. (1968). The external validity of experiments. Am. Educ. Res. J. 5: 437–474. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312005004437.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, D.E. (1991). Human universals. New York, McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Camerer, C.F. and Ho, T.H. (1999). Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67: 827–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00054.Suche in Google Scholar

Charness, G. and Martin, D. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74: 1579–1601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Chelius, J.R. (1976). Liability for industrial accidents. A comparison of negligence and strict liability systems. J. Leg. Stud. 5: 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1086/467554.Suche in Google Scholar

Clatch, L. and Borgida, E. (2021). Behavioral economics in plea-bargain decision-making: beyond the shadow-of-trial model. Rev. Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0069.10.1515/rle-2021-0069Suche in Google Scholar

Craswell, R. (1988). Contract remedies, renegotiation, and the theory of efficient breach. South. Calif. Law Rev. 61: 629–670.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A. (2021). Experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.2307/j.ctv1nxcvxxSuche in Google Scholar

Desmet, P. and Engel, C. (2021). People are conditional rule followers. J. Econ. Psychol. 85: 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102384.Suche in Google Scholar

Ederer, F. and Stremitzer, A. (2017). Promises and expectations. Game. Econ. Behav. 106: 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Edlin, A.S. (1996). Cadillac contracts and up-front payments. Efficient investment under expectation damages. J. Law Econ. Organ. 12: 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023363.Suche in Google Scholar

Eigen, Z.J. (2012). When and why individuals obey form-adhesive contracts. Experimental evidence of consent, compliance, promise and performance. J. Leg. Stud. 41: 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/664688.Suche in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, T. and Engel, C. (2016). Unpacking negligence liability. Experimentally testing the governance effect. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 13: 116–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12099.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellickson, R.C. (1989). Bringing culture and human frailty to rational actors: a critique of classical law and economics. Chic. Kent. Law Rev. 65: 23–56.Suche in Google Scholar

Engel, C. (2005). Generating predictability. Institutional analysis and institutional design. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige.10.1017/CBO9780511490033Suche in Google Scholar

Engel, C. (2007). The psychological case for obliging judges to write reasons. In: Engel, C. and Strack, F. (Eds.), The impact of court procedure on the psychology of judicial decision making. Nomos Publishers, Baden-Baden, pp. 71–109.10.5771/9783845204291-71Suche in Google Scholar

Engel, C. (2021). The proper scope of behavioral law and economics. In: Grundmann, S. and Hacker, P. (Eds.), Theories of choice. The social science and the law of decision making. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 19–36.10.2139/ssrn.3104475Suche in Google Scholar

Engel, C. and Güth, W. (2018). Modeling a satisficing judge. Ration. Soc. 30: 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463118767406.Suche in Google Scholar

Engel, C., Hausladen, C., and Schubert, M. (2020). Charting the type space. The case of linear public good games. Max Planck Institute, Bonn.Suche in Google Scholar

Englich, B. and Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: anchoring effects in the court room. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 31: 1535–1551.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02687.xSuche in Google Scholar

Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114: 817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., and Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71: 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00394-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., and ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Grgić-Hlača, N., Engel, C., and Gummadi, K.P. (2019). Human decision making with machine assistance. An experiment on bailing and jailing. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, CSCW, Article 178 (November 2019).10.2139/ssrn.3465622Suche in Google Scholar

Hart, O. and Moore, J. (2008). Contracts as reference points. Q. J. Econ. 123: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Hastie, R. (1993). Inside the juror. The psychology of juror decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England, New York, NY.10.1017/CBO9780511752896Suche in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Russell Sage Foundation.10.1017/CBO9780511803475Suche in Google Scholar

Kleine, M., Pascal, L., and Zhurakhovska, L. (2016). Fairness and persuasion. How stakeholder communication affects impartial decision making. Econ. Lett. 141: 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.02.019.Suche in Google Scholar

Köszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q. J. Econ. 121: 1133–1165.10.1162/qjec.121.4.1133Suche in Google Scholar

Kripke, H. (1984). Law and economics. Measuring the economic efficiency of commercial law in a vacuum of fact. Univ. Penn. Law Rev. 133: 929–985.10.2307/3311991Suche in Google Scholar

Levmore, S. (2021). The evolutionary force of behavioral economics in law. Rev. Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0054.10.1515/rle-2021-0054Suche in Google Scholar

Miceli, T. and Segerson, K. (2021). The role of bias in economic models of law. Rev. Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0043.10.1515/rle-2021-0043Suche in Google Scholar

Mussweiler, T. and Strack, F. (2000). Numeric judgements under uncertainty: the role of knowledge in anchoring. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36: 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1414.Suche in Google Scholar

Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1993). The story model for juror decision making. In: Hastie, R. (Ed.), Inside the juror. The psychology of juror decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 192–221.10.1017/CBO9780511752896.010Suche in Google Scholar

Pi, D. (2021). The limitations of behavioral economics in tort law. Rev. Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0076.10.1515/rle-2021-0076Suche in Google Scholar

Priest, G.L. and Klein, B. (1984). The selection of disputes for litigation. J. Leg. Stud. 13: 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/467732.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzo, M.J. (2021). The paternalistic turn in behavioral law and economics. A critique. Rev. Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0056.10.1515/rle-2021-0056Suche in Google Scholar

Roe, B.E. and Just, D.R. (2009). Internal and external validity in economics research. Tradeoffs between experiments, field experiments, natural experiments, and field data. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 91: 1266–1271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01295.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Shavell, S. (1980). Strict liability versus negligence. J. Leg. Stud. 9: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/467626.Suche in Google Scholar

Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Solomon, F., and Lindsay, R.C.L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations. A meta-analytic comparison. Law Hum. Behav. 25: 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012888715007.10.1023/A:1012888715007Suche in Google Scholar

Strack, F. and Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect. Mechanisms of selective accessibility. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437.Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2013). Behavioral economics and paternalism. Yale Law J. 122: 1826–1899.10.2139/ssrn.2182619Suche in Google Scholar

Teichman, D. and Zamir, E. (2021). Behavioral economics and court decision-making. Rev. Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0058.10.1515/rle-2021-0058Suche in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, Yale.Suche in Google Scholar

Treitel, G.H. (1988). Remedies for breach of contract: a comparative account. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255000.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.Suche in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 59: 5251–5278. https://doi.org/10.1086/296365.Suche in Google Scholar

Tyler, T.R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press, New Haven.10.1515/9781400828609Suche in Google Scholar

Ulen, T.S. (1984). The efficiency of specific performance. Toward a unified theory of contract remedies. Mich. Law Rev. 83: 341–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/1288569.Suche in Google Scholar

Ulen, T.S. (2021). Behavioral contract law. Rev. Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0067.10.1515/rle-2021-0067Suche in Google Scholar

Vanberg, C. (2008). Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76: 1467–1480.10.3982/ECTA7673Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, J.Q. and Kelling, G.L. (1982). Police and neighborhood safety. Broken windows. Atl. Mon. 127: 29–38.10.4324/9781315087863-11Suche in Google Scholar

Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. (2014). The oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945474.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. (2018). Behavioral law and economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780190901349.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar