Marking of quality modifiers in 2nd-generation IE languages
-
Artemij Keidan
Abstract
In PIE, quality modifiers were expressed by stative verbs and nominal epithets, rather than by special adjectival lexemes. Adjectives did not form a separate lexical class. This made the encoding of the NP constituency less explicit. If we consider what I suggest calling “second-generation IE languages” we can observe a general tendency to create new, more explicit morphological means of dependency marking within a NP. The exact outcomes of this diachronic process vary from one language to another. However, if we parametrise the variation, a common pattern becomes clearly observable. In all the languages analysed in the present paper, there is a pronoun undergoing grammaticalisation as a dependency marker. What varies is (1) the position of this element with respect to the nominal base (pre- vs. postposed); (2) the degree of agglutination (bound morpheme vs. clitic vs. free morpheme); and (3) the locus of marking (head vs. modifier vs. double or alternant marking); (4) the source morpheme that undergoes grammaticalisation (relative vs. demonstrative pronoun).
5 Acknowledgments
I wish to thank my colleagues who kindly revised preliminary drafts of this paper providing invaluable feedback either on single linguistic examples, or on the paper in general, for instance: Claudia A. Ciancaglini, Alessandro del Tomba, Alessandro Papini, Irina Pekunova, Valerio Pisaniello, and Artūras Ratkus. My gratitude goes also to the anonymous PSiCL reviewers whose remarks helped me to correct regrettable mistakes and to refine the argumentation. As usual, the responsibility for any errors or deficiencies rests with me.
References
Adiego, I.J. 2007. The Carian language. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004152816.i-526Suche in Google Scholar
Alfieri, L. 2016. “The definition of the root between history and typology”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 101(2). 129–169.Suche in Google Scholar
Bakker, S.J. 2009. The noun phrase in Ancient Greek. A functional analysis of the order and articulation of NP Constituents in Herodotus. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004177222.i-324Suche in Google Scholar
Bammesberger, A. 1990. Die Morphologie des urgermanischen Nomens. Heidelberg: Winter.Suche in Google Scholar
Bauer, B.L.M. 1995. The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French. Diachronic and psycholinguistic perspectives. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195091038.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Bauer, B.L.M. 2007. “The definite article in Indo-European: Emergence of a new grammatical category?” In: Stark, E., E. Leiss and W. Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination. Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.89.07bauSuche in Google Scholar
Belardi, W. 1990. “Genealogia, tipologia, ricostruzione e leggi fonetiche”. In: Linguistica generale, filologia e critica dell’espressione. Roma: Bonacci. 155–216.Suche in Google Scholar
Belardi, W. 1993. “Sulla tipologia della struttura formale della parola nelle lingue indoeuropee”. Rendiconti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Classe delle scienze morali 9(4.4). 535–570.Suche in Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. 1966. “La phrase relative, problème de syntaxe générale”. In: Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard. 208–222.Suche in Google Scholar
Burrow, T. 1937. The language of the Kharoṣṭhi documents from Chinese Turkestan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Caland, W. 1891. Zur Syntax der Pronomina im Avesta. Amsterdam: Müller.Suche in Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1942–1953. Grammaire homérique. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 2015. Grammaticalization in the North. Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_559871Suche in Google Scholar
Dini, P.U. 2014. Foundations of Baltic languages. Vilnius: Vilnius University.Suche in Google Scholar
Dunkel, G.E. 2014. Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. Vol. 2. Heidelberg: Winter.Suche in Google Scholar
Durkin-Meisterernst, D. 2014. Grammatik des Westmitteliranischen (Parthisch und Mittelpersisch). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.10.2307/j.ctt1vw0pjfSuche in Google Scholar
Dyen, I. 1990. “The homomeric argument for a Slavo-Germanic subgroup of Indo- European”. In: Baldi, P. (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 385–390.10.1515/9783110886092.385Suche in Google Scholar
Edgerton, F. 1936. “Nouns of the a-declension in Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit”. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 1(1). 65–83.10.2307/2718038Suche in Google Scholar
Emmerick, R.E. 1968. Saka grammatical studies. London: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Emmerick, R.E. 2009. “Khotanese and Tumshuqese”. In: Windfuhr, G. (ed.), The Iranian languages. (Chap. 7.) London & New York: Routledge. 377–415.Suche in Google Scholar
Evans, E. 2019. The origin, functions, and histories of Germanic adjective endings”. (PhD thesis, Indiana University, Department of Germanic Studies.)Suche in Google Scholar
Franco, L., M.R. Manzini and L.M. Savoia. 2015. “Linkers and agreement”. The Linguistic Review 32(2). 277–332.10.1515/tlr-2014-0024Suche in Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, B.L. 1900–1911. Syntax of Classical Greek. From Homer to Demosthenes. New York, Cincinnati & Chicago: American Book Company.Suche in Google Scholar
Haider, H. and R. Zwanziger. 1984. “Relatively attributive: The ‘ezāfe’-construction from Old Iranian to Modern Persian”. In: Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical syntax. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 137–172.10.1515/9783110824032.137Suche in Google Scholar
Hajnal, I. 1997. “Definite nominale Determination im Indogermanischen”. IndogermanischeForschungen 102. 38–73.Suche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2001. “The European linguistic area. Standard Average European”. In: Language Typology and Language Universals. Berlin: De Gruyter. 1492– 1510.10.1515/9783110171549.2Suche in Google Scholar
Held, W.H. 1957. “The Hittite relative sentence”. Language 33(4.2). 7–52.10.2307/522235Suche in Google Scholar
Humbert, J. 1960. Syntaxe grecque. (3rd ed.) Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Ivanov, V.V. 1979. “Sravnitel’no-istoričeskij analiz kategorii opredelennosti – neopredelennosti v slavjanskix, baltijskix i drevnebalkanskix jazykax v svete indoevropeistiki i nostratiki”. In: Nikolaeva, T.M. (ed.), Kategorija opredelennosti – neopredelennosti v slavjanskix i balkanskix jazykax. Moskva: Nauka. 11–63.Suche in Google Scholar
Keidan, A. 2013. “Branch-crossing Indo-European isoglosses: A call for interest”. Indoevropejskoe âzykoznanie i klassičeskaâ filologiâ 17. 406–417.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. 1975. “Die Flexionen des Adjektivs im Baltischen und im Slavischen”. In: Coseriu, E. (ed.), Esquisses Linguistiques II. München: Fink. 426–438.Suche in Google Scholar
Lavency, M. 1998. Grammaire fondamentale du latin. V.2. La proposition relative. Louvain & Paris: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 2018. “Adjective and attribution. Category and operation”. In: Baumann, C., V. Dabóczi and S. Hartlmaier (eds.), Adjektive. Grammatik, Pragmatik, Erwerb. Berlin: De Gruyter. 13–76.10.1515/9783110584042-002Suche in Google Scholar
Lejeune, M. 1973. “La grande inscription celtibère de Botorrita (Saragosse)”. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 117(4). 622– 648.10.3406/crai.1973.12946Suche in Google Scholar
Leskien, A. 1876. Die Declination im Slavisch-Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: Hirzel.Suche in Google Scholar
Luján, E.R. 2009. “On the grammaticalization of *kʷi-/kʷo- relative clauses in Proto-Indo-European”. In: Bubeník, V., J. Hewson and S. Rose (eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.305.22lujSuche in Google Scholar
McFadden, T. 2004. “On the pronominal inflection of the Germanic strong adjective”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10(1). 123–136.Suche in Google Scholar
Meillet, A. 1906–1908. “La phrase nominale en indo-européen”. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 14. 1–26.Suche in Google Scholar
Meillet, A. 1915. Grammaire du vieux Perse. Paris: Guilmoto.Suche in Google Scholar
Meillet, A. 1934. Le slave commun. (Ed. by A. Vaillant. 2nd ed.) Paris: Champion.Suche in Google Scholar
Meyer, R. 2017. Iranian-Armenian language contact in and before the 5th century CE. An investigation into pattern replication and societal multilingualism. (PhD thesis. Oxford: University of Oxford.)Suche in Google Scholar
Nevis, J.A. and B.D. Joseph. 1993. “Wackemagel affixes: Evidence from Balto-Slavic”. In: Booij, C. and J. v. Marie (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1992. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 93–11l.10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_4Suche in Google Scholar
Nichols, J. 1986. “Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar”. Language 62(1). 56–119.10.1353/lan.1986.0014Suche in Google Scholar
Nyberg, H.S. 1964–1974. A manual of Pahlavi. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Suche in Google Scholar
Oberlies, T. 2001. Pāli. A grammar of the language of the Theravāda Tipiṭaka. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110870930Suche in Google Scholar
Orr, R. 1983. “The twofold adjective declension in Germanic and Slavic (with some reference to Baltic): A contrastive/comparative analysis”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 96(1). 104–118.10.1111/j.1439-0418.1983.tb03648.xSuche in Google Scholar
Parenti, A. 1996. “L’aggettivo determinato lituano e l’evoluzione delle marche di definitezza”. In: Benacchio, R., F. Fici and L. Gebert (eds.), Determinatezza e indeterminatezza nelle lingue slave. Padova: Unipress. 27–42.Suche in Google Scholar
Petit, D. 2009. “La préhistoire des adjectifs déterminés du baltique et du slave”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 104. 311–360.10.2143/BSL.104.1.2046994Suche in Google Scholar
Pisani, V. 1950. “Studi sulla fonetica dell’armeno. I. Palatalizzazioni ed esiti di s + gutturale; esiti delle semivocali”. Ricerche Linguistiche 1. 165–193.Suche in Google Scholar
Pischel, R. 1900. Grammatik der Prakrit-Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.10.1515/9783111700007Suche in Google Scholar
Polivanova, A. K. 2013. Staroslavjanskij jazyk. Grammatika. Slovari. Moskva: Institut Slavjanovedenija.Suche in Google Scholar
Probert, P. 2015. Early Greek relative clauses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713821.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Prokosch, E. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic society of America.Suche in Google Scholar
Ratkus, A. 2015. “Gothic possessives, adjectives, and other modifiers in -ata”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27(3). 238–307.10.1017/S1470542714000233Suche in Google Scholar
Ratkus, A. 2018. “Weak adjectives need not be definite. The evidence of variation in Gothic”. Indogermanische Forschungen 123(1). 27–64.10.1515/if-2018-0002Suche in Google Scholar
Rosinas, A. 1975. “Ar baltų *i-, *i̯o- resp. *ı̄, *i̯ā- kamienai buvo reliatyviniai?” Baltistica 11(2). 165– 170.Suche in Google Scholar
Schmitt, R. 2014. Wörterbuch der altpersischen Königsinschriften. Wiesbaden: Reichert.10.29091/9783954906437Suche in Google Scholar
Schwyzer, E. and A. Debrunner. 1939–1950. Griechische Grammatik. München: C. H. Beck.Suche in Google Scholar
Seiler, H. 1960. Relativsatz, Attribut und Apposition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Suche in Google Scholar
Sievers, E. 1876. “Kleine Beitrage zur deutschen Grammatik III. Die starke Adjectivdeclination”. Beitrage zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 2. 98–124.10.1515/bgsl.1876.2.1.98Suche in Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, N. 1990. “Chotano-Sogdica II. Aspects of the development of nominal morphology in Khotanese and Sogdian”. In: Gnoli, G. and A. Panaino (eds.), Proceedings of the first European conference of Iranian studies, held in Turin, September 7th–11th, 1987. (Vol. 1.) Rome: IsMEO. 276– 296.Suche in Google Scholar
Strunk, K. 1967. “Wortstruktur und Pronomen im Altpersischen”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 81(3–4). 265–275.Suche in Google Scholar
Trautmann, R. 1910. Die altpreussischen Sprachdenkmäler. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Suche in Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. 1942. “L’article en vieux slave”. Revue des Études Slaves 20. 5–12.10.3406/slave.1942.1398Suche in Google Scholar
Večerka, R., R.M. Cejtlin and Ė. Blagova. 1994. Staroslavjanskij slovar’ po rukopisjam X–XI vekov. Moskva: Russkij jazyk.Suche in Google Scholar
West, M.L. 2011. Old Avestan syntax and stylistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253092Suche in Google Scholar
Wissemann, H. 1957. “Zur nominalen Determination”. Indogermanische Forschungen 63. 61–78.Suche in Google Scholar
Woolner, A.C. 1928. Introduction to Prakrit. (2nd ed.) Lahore: Punjab University.Suche in Google Scholar
Zinkevičius, Z. 1958. “Nekotorye voprosy obrazovanija mestoimennyx prilagatel’nyx v litovskom jazyke”. Voprosy slavjanskogo jazykoznanija 3. 50–100.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Morphosyntactic isoglosses in Indo-European: An introduction
- The lexicalization of the adjective class as an innovative feature in the Indo-European family
- Marking of quality modifiers in 2nd-generation IE languages
- Oblique anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European
- Correlative negation in Old Persian
- Shaping modern Indo-Aryan isoglosses
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Morphosyntactic isoglosses in Indo-European: An introduction
- The lexicalization of the adjective class as an innovative feature in the Indo-European family
- Marking of quality modifiers in 2nd-generation IE languages
- Oblique anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European
- Correlative negation in Old Persian
- Shaping modern Indo-Aryan isoglosses
