Collective Obligations and Demandingness Complaints
-
Brian Berkey
Abstract
It has been suggested that understanding our obligations to address large-scale moral problems such as global poverty and the threat of severe climate change as fundamentally collective can allow us to insist that a great deal must be done about these problems while denying that there are very demanding obligations, applying to either individuals or collectives, to contribute to addressing them. I argue that this strategy for limiting demandingness fails because those who endorse collective obligations to address large-scale moral problems have no grounds for denying that the relevant collectives are obligated to do what is impartially best. Specifically, I argue that appeals to the claim that collective obligations to do what is impartially best would be objectionably demanding cannot succeed, for two reasons. The first is that demandingness complaints cannot be aggregated across the individual members of a collective. And the second is that demandingness complaints cannot plausibly be asserted on behalf of collectives themselves. I conclude by suggesting some reasons to think that collective obligations to address large-scale problems will tend to imply demanding individual obligations.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to audiences at the Collectivity Conference at the University of Bristol, the 2015 Pacific Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association, the 2017 Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress, the Individual and Collective Duties to Rescue Workshop at the Institute for Future Studies in Stockholm, and the Demandingness in Practice Workshop at the University of Münster. Patrick Fleming provided helpful comments at the Pacific APA meeting, as did Sara Ghaffari at the Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress. Amy Sepinwall provided helpful written comments. I have also benefitted from discussions with Rachelle Bascara, Jelena Belic, Amy Berg, Megan Blomfeld, Joe Bowen, Vince Buccola, Mark Budolfson, Stephanie Collins, Peter Conti-Brown, Simon Derpmann, Helen Frowe, Gwen Gordon, Anna Hartford, Rob Hughes, Matthew Kramer, Holly Lawford-Smith, Alex Levitov, Hallie Liberto, Sarah Light, Kian Mintz-Woo, Véronique Munoz-Dardé, Kieran Oberman, Ingmar Persson, Julie Rose, Liam Shields, Patrick Taylor Smith, Susanne Uusitalo, Marcel van Ackeren, and David Zaring.
References
Arnold, D. (2006). ‘Corporate Moral Agency’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30: 279–291.10.4135/9781412956260.n200Suche in Google Scholar
Berkey, B. (2014). ‘Climate Change, Moral Intuitions, and Moral Demandingness’, Philosophy and Public Issues 4 (2): 157–189.Suche in Google Scholar
Berkey, B. (2016). ‘The Demandingness of Morality: Toward a Reflective Equilibrium’, Philosophical Studies 73 (11): 3015–3035.10.1007/s11098-016-0648-9Suche in Google Scholar
Braddock, M. (2013). ‘Defusing the Demandingness Objection: Unreliable Intuitions,’ Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (2): 169–191.10.1111/josp.12018Suche in Google Scholar
Collins, S. (2013). ‘Collectives’ Duties and Collectivization Duties,’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2): 231–248.10.1080/00048402.2012.717533Suche in Google Scholar
Collins, S. and Lawford-Smith, H. (2016). ‘Collectives’ and Individuals’ Obligations: A Parity Argument,’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1): 38–58.10.1080/00455091.2015.1116350Suche in Google Scholar
French, P. (1979). ‘The Corporation as a Moral Person,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3): 207–215.10.4324/9781315253770-3Suche in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. (2012). ‘Excused by the Unwillingness of Others?’ Analysis 72 (1): 18–24.10.1093/analys/anr128Suche in Google Scholar
Hess, K. (2013). ‘If You Tickle Us…: How Corporations Can Be Moral Agents without Being Persons,’ Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (3): 319–335.10.1007/s10790-013-9391-zSuche in Google Scholar
Jackson, F. (1987). ‘Group Morality,’ in P. Pettit, R. Sylvan and J. Norman (eds.). Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J.J.C. Smart (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 91–110.Suche in Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, J. (2014). Distant Strangers: Ethics, Psychology, and Global Poverty (New York: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781139049290Suche in Google Scholar
List, C. (2018). ‘What Is It like to Be a Group Agent?’ Noûs 52 (2): 295–319.10.1111/nous.12162Suche in Google Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents (New York: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Murphy, L. (2000). Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).10.1093/oso/9780195079760.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Norcross, A. (1997). ‘Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (2): 135–167.10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00079.xSuche in Google Scholar
Norcross, A. (1998). ‘Great Harms from Small Benefits Grow: How Death Can Be Outweighed by Headaches,’ Analysis 58 (2): 152–158.10.1093/analys/58.2.152Suche in Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).Suche in Google Scholar
Pasternak, A. (2017). ‘From Corporate Moral Agency to Corporate Moral Rights,’ Law and Ethics of Human Rights 11 (1): 135–159.10.1515/lehr-2017-0003Suche in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2007). ‘Responsibility Incorporated,’ Ethics 117 (2): 171–201.10.1086/510695Suche in Google Scholar
Phillips, M.J. (1992). ‘Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation,’ Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2): 435–459.10.2307/3857581Suche in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).10.4159/9780674042582Suche in Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Suche in Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (1992). Human Morality (New York: Oxford University Press).Suche in Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (1994). The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions, Revised Edition (New York: Oxford University Press).10.1093/0198235119.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Sepinwall, A.J. (2016). ‘Corporate Moral Responsibility,’ Philosophy Compass 11 (1): 3–13.10.1111/phc3.12293Suche in Google Scholar
Silver, D. (2005). ‘A Strawsonian Defense of Corporate Moral Responsibility,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4): 279–293.Suche in Google Scholar
Silver, K. (forthcoming). ‘Can a Corporation Be Worthy of Moral Consideration?’ Journal of Business Ethics.10.1007/s10551-018-3787-4Suche in Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2005). ‘It’s Not My Fault: Global Warming and Individual Moral Obligations,’ in W. Sinnott-Armstrong and R. Howarth (eds.). Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics (Oxford: Elsevier), pp. 285–307.10.1016/S1569-3740(05)05013-3Suche in Google Scholar
Sobel, D. (2007). ‘The Impotence of the Demandingness Objection,’ Philosophers’ Imprint 7 (8): 1–17.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712640.003.0013Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973). ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism,’ in J.J.C. Smart and B. Williams (eds.). Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 77–150.10.1017/CBO9780511840852Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1981). ‘Persons, Character, and Morality,’ in B. Williams (eds.). Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–19.10.1017/CBO9781139165860Suche in Google Scholar
Wringe, B. (2005). ‘Needs, Rights, and Collective Obligations’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 57: 187–207.10.1017/CBO9780511599750.010Suche in Google Scholar
Wringe, B. (2014a). ‘From Global Collective Obligations to Institutional Obligations’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38: 171–186.10.1111/misp.12022Suche in Google Scholar
Wringe, B. (2014b). ‘May I Treat a Collective as a Mere Means?’ American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3): 273–284.Suche in Google Scholar
Wringe, B. (2016). ‘Collective Obligations: Their Existence, Their Explanatory Power, and Their Supervenience on the Obligations of Individuals,’ European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2): 472–497.10.1111/ejop.12076Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Demandingness in Practice
- The Demandingness of Deontological Duties: Is the Absolute Impermissibility of Placatory Torture Irrational?
- How Much Should a Person Know? Moral Inquiry & Demandingness
- Demandingness and Public Health Ethics
- Principled Utility Discounting Under Risk
- Collective Obligations and Demandingness Complaints
- Articles
- Which Borders?
- Sufficientarianism and the Measurement of Inequality
- Indirect Instrumentalism about Political Legitimacy
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Demandingness in Practice
- The Demandingness of Deontological Duties: Is the Absolute Impermissibility of Placatory Torture Irrational?
- How Much Should a Person Know? Moral Inquiry & Demandingness
- Demandingness and Public Health Ethics
- Principled Utility Discounting Under Risk
- Collective Obligations and Demandingness Complaints
- Articles
- Which Borders?
- Sufficientarianism and the Measurement of Inequality
- Indirect Instrumentalism about Political Legitimacy
