Invariant density estimation for a reflected diffusion using an Euler scheme

References

[1] V. Bally and D. Talay, The law of Euler scheme for stochastic differential equations (I): Convergence rate of the distribution function, Probab. Theory Related Fields 104 (1995), no. 1, 43–60. 10.1007/BF01303802Suche in Google Scholar

[2] V. Bally and D. Talay, The law of Euler scheme for stochastic differential equations (II): Convergence rate of the density, Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 2 (1996), no. 2, 93–128. 10.1515/mcma.1996.2.2.93Suche in Google Scholar

[3] M. Bossy, E. Gobet and D. Talay, A symmetrized Euler scheme for an efficient approximation of reflected diffusions, J. Appl. Probab. 41 (2004), 877–889. 10.1239/jap/1091543431Suche in Google Scholar

[4] P. Cattiaux, Stochastic calculus and degenerate boundary value problems, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 42 (1992), no. 3, 541–624. 10.5802/aif.1302Suche in Google Scholar

[5] P. Cattiaux, J. R. Leon and C. Prieur, Estimation for stochastic damping Hamiltonian systems under partial observations I: Invariant density, Stochastic Process. Appl. 124 (2014), no. 3, 1236–1260. 10.1016/j.spa.2013.10.008Suche in Google Scholar

[6] J. Dedecker and C. Prieur, New dependence coefficients. Examples and applications to statistics, Probab. Theory Related Fields 132 (2005), 203–236. 10.1007/s00440-004-0394-3Suche in Google Scholar

[7] P. Doukhan, Mixing. Properties and Examples, Lecture Notes in Statist. 85, Springer, New York, 1994. 10.1007/978-1-4612-2642-0Suche in Google Scholar

[8] E. Gobet, Efficient schemes for the weak approximation of reflected diffusions, Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 7 (2001), no. 1–2, 193–202. 10.1515/mcma.2001.7.1-2.193Suche in Google Scholar

[9] E. Gobet, Euler schemes and half-space approximation for the simulation of diffusions in a domain, ESAIM Probab. Stat. 5 (2001), 261–297. 10.1051/ps:2001112Suche in Google Scholar

[10] E. Gobet and C. Labart, Sharp estimates for the convergence of the density of the Euler scheme in small time, Electron. Commun. Probab. 13 (2008), 352–363. 10.1214/ECP.v13-1393Suche in Google Scholar

[11] J. Guyon, Euler schemes and tempered distributions, Stochastic Process. Appl. 116 (2006), 877–904. 10.1016/j.spa.2005.11.011Suche in Google Scholar

[12] I. Honoré, S. Menozzi and G. Pagès, Non asymptotic Gaussian estimates for the recursive approximation of the invariant measure of a diffusion, preprint (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08525v1. Suche in Google Scholar

[13] N. Ikeda and S. Watanabe, Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981. Suche in Google Scholar

[14] J. C. Mattingly, A. M. Stuart and D. J. Higham, Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: Locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise, Stochastic Process. Appl. 101 (2002), 185–232. 10.1016/S0304-4149(02)00150-3Suche in Google Scholar

[15] S. Meyn and R. Tweedie, Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. 10.1017/CBO9780511626630Suche in Google Scholar

[16] T. Shardlow and A. M. Stuart, A perturbation theory for ergodic Markov chains and application to numerical approximations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2000), no. 4, 1120–1137. 10.1137/S0036142998337235Suche in Google Scholar

[17] D. Talay, Second order discretization schemes of stochastic differential systems for the computation of the invariant law, Stoch. Stoch. Rep. 29 (1990), no. 1, 13–36. 10.1080/17442509008833606Suche in Google Scholar

[18] M. Valera-López, A. Pineda and J. R. León, Application of satellite image to the implementation of two stochastic models for modeling the transport of chlorophyll-a on Lake Valencia (Venezuela), Technical report HAL Id: tel-01293471, Version 2, 2016. Suche in Google Scholar