Interactional means of teaming up: enacting the features of contemporary working life in a theater performance

References

Beebe, B., Stern, D., and Jaffe, J. (1979). The kinesic rhythm of mother-infant interactions. In: Siegman, A. and Feldstein, S. (Eds.). Of speech and time: temporal patterns in interpersonal contexts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 23–34.Suche in Google Scholar

Broth, M. (2011). The theater performance as interaction between actors and their audience. Nottm. Fr. Stud. 50: 113–133. https://doi.org/10.3366/nfs.2011-2.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Broth, M. and Keevallik, L. (2014). Getting ready to move as a couple: accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space Cult. 17: 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508483.Suche in Google Scholar

Burns, E. (1972). Theatricality: a study of convention in the theatre and in social life. Longman, London.Suche in Google Scholar

Cain, S.S. (2018). When laughter fades: individual participation during open-mic comedy performances, dissertation. Houston, Texas, Rice University.Suche in Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk: living and working in a communication culture. Sage, London.10.4135/9781446217993Suche in Google Scholar

Cekaite, A. and Holm Kvist, M. (2017). The comforting touch: tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 50: 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301293.Suche in Google Scholar

Coates, J. (1994). No gap, lots of overlap: turn-taking patterns in the talk of women friends. In: Graddol, D., Maybin, J., and Stierer, B. (Eds.). Researching language and literacy in social context. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK, pp. 177–192.Suche in Google Scholar

De Stefani, E. and Mondada, L. (2014). Reorganizing mobile formations: when “guided” participants initiate reorientations in guided tours. Space Cult. 17: 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508504.Suche in Google Scholar

Djordjilovic, O. (2012). Displaying and developing team identity in workplace meetings – a multimodal perspective. Discourse Stud. 14: 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427205.Suche in Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. (2001[1912]). The elementary forms of religious life (translated by Cosman, C.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Suche in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. (2011). Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In: Stivers, T., Mondada, L., and Steensig, J. (Eds.). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 285–312.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.013Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M.H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Pap. Pragmatics 1: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo.Suche in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, A. (2001). On some uses of the discourse particle kyllä in Finnish conversations. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Selting, M. (Eds.). Studies in interactional linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 171–198.10.1075/sidag.10.09hakSuche in Google Scholar

Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.10.2307/j.ctvjsf48hSuche in Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., and Rapson, R.L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. Rev. Psychol. Emot. Soc. Behav. 14: 25–59.10.1017/CBO9781139174138Suche in Google Scholar

Hazel, S. (2015). Acting, interacting, enacting – representing medical practice in theatre performance. In: Kjær, M., Jørgensen, J.L., and Holm Riis, A. (Eds.), Thematic issue on ‘health’, Vol. 12. Akademisk Kvarter/Academic Quarter, Aalborg University, pp. 44–64.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazel, S. (2018). Discovering interactional authenticity: tracking theatre practitioners across rehearsals. In: González-Martínez, E., Wagner, J., and Pekarek Doehler, S. (Eds.). Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 255–283.10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_9Suche in Google Scholar

Heckscher, C. (1994). Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In: Heckscher, C. and Donnellon, A. (Eds.). The post-bureaucratic organization: new perspectives for organizational change. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 14–62.Suche in Google Scholar

Heckscher, C. and Adler, P.S. (2007). Firm as a collaborative community: reconstructing trust in knowledge economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Heider, A. and Warner, R.S. (2010). Bodies in sync: interaction ritual theory applied to sacred harp singing. Sociol. Relig. 71: 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srq001.Suche in Google Scholar

Hindmarsh, J. and Pilnick, A. (2007). Knowing bodies at work: embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organ. Stud. 28: 1395–1416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607068258.Suche in Google Scholar

Iedema, R. (2003). Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/ddcs.5Suche in Google Scholar

Iedema, R. and Scheeres, H. (2003). From doing work to talking work: renegotiating knowing and identity. Appl. Linguist. 24: 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.316.Suche in Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1990). List-construction as a task and a resource. In: Psathas, G. (Ed.). Interaction competence. University Press of America, Washington, D.C., pp. 63–92.Suche in Google Scholar

Kangasharju, H. (1996). Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation. J. Pragmat. 26: 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00051-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Karppi, T., Kähkönen, L., Mannevuo, M., Pajala, M., and Sihvonen, T. (2016). Affective capitalism: investments and investigations. Ephimera Theory Polit. Organ. 16: 1–13.Suche in Google Scholar

Koski, A. (2016). Palvelutalous selätti teknologiaikonin. In: Parviainen, J., Kinnunen, T., and Kortelainen, I. (Eds.). Ruumiillisuus ja työelämä: Työruumis jälkiteollisessa taloudessa [Embodiment and the working life: working body in post-industrial economy]. Tampere, Vastapaino, pp. 40–56.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge, London.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold, London.Suche in Google Scholar

Lerner, G. (1993). Collectivities in action: establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text 13: 213–245. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.213.Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, S.C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In: Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (Eds.). Handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Boston, MA, pp. 103–130.10.1002/9781118325001.ch6Suche in Google Scholar

Machin, D. (2013). Analyzing popular music: image, sound and text. Sage, London.10.1515/sem-2013-0084Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, W. (1995). Keeping together in time. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Suche in Google Scholar

Nissi, R. and Dlaske, K. (2020). Empowerment as an affective-discursive technology in contemporary capitalism: insights from a play. Crit. Discourse Stud. 17: 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1649161.Suche in Google Scholar

Peräkylä, A. and Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse Soc. 14: 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003.Suche in Google Scholar

Phillips-Silver, J. and Keller, P.E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musical interactions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6: 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00026.Suche in Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. (2018). Prefiguring the future: projections and preparations within theatrical rehearsal. In: Deppermann, A. and Streeck, J. (Eds.). Time in embodied interaction: synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 231–260.10.1075/pbns.293.07schSuche in Google Scholar

Selting, M. (1994). Emphatic speech style – special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. J. Pragmat. 22: 375–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90116-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Stevanovic, M. and Peräkylä, A. (2015). Experience sharing, emotional reciprocity, and turn-taking. Front. Psychol. 6: 450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00450.Suche in Google Scholar

Stevanovic, M., Himberg, T., Niinisalo, M., Kahri, M., Peräkylä, A., Sams, M., and Hari, R. (2017). Sequentiality, mutual visibility, and behavioral matching: body sway and pitch register during joint decision-making. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 50: 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1262130.Suche in Google Scholar

Stokoe, E. (2013). The (in)authenticity of simulated talk: comparing role-played and actual conversation and the implications for communication training. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 46: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.780341.Suche in Google Scholar

Stokoe, E., Sikveland, R.O., Albert, S., Hamann, M., and Housley, W. (2019). Can human simulate talking like other humans? Comparing simulated clients to real customers in service inquiries. Discourse Stud. 22: 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619887537.Suche in Google Scholar

Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Stud. 6: 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604046591.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. and Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Dev. Sci. 10: 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Vatanen, A. (2014). Responding in overlap: agency, epistemicity and social action in conversation, Ph.D. dissertation. Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugric and Scandinavian Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Weeks, P. (1996). Synchrony lost, synchrony regained: the achievement of musical co-ordination. Hum. Stud. 19: 199–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00131494.Suche in Google Scholar