Startseite Question is the source of knowledge: question-asking executed by patients during online medical consultation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Question is the source of knowledge: question-asking executed by patients during online medical consultation

  • Xiaojiang Wang ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Yansheng Mao
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Juli 2025
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
Aus der Zeitschrift Lodz Papers in Pragmatics

Abstract

Although there is a wealth of studies on question-asking during clinical settings, scant attention has been paid to patient’s practice of question-asking, especially during Online Medical Consultation (OMC). This study thus probes into the forms, topics, and functions of Chinese e-patient’s question-asking during OMCs. A dataset of 267 examples of e-patient’s question-asking was collected from 44 doctor-patient interactions from Chunyu Doctor. Conventional form (Polar question, Wh-question, Alternative question) and non-conventional form (Sentential fragment, Statement, Response token) were identified and analyzed. Medical questions and General questions were two topics the question-asking concerns. Functionally, e-patient’s question-asking serves as unknown information-seeking, doubted information-verifying, corresponding action-requesting, lay expertise-displaying, and shared decision-making. Furthermore, e-patient’s question-asking is discussed as a deliberate balance between proactive participation and respect for doctor’s superior epistemic access and authorized status.


Corresponding author: Xiaojiang Wang, School of Foreign Studies, Nanjing University, Xianlin Street, 163, 210000, Nanjing, P. R. China, E-mail:

References

Barnes, K. Rebecca & Iris van der Scheer. 2021. Conversation analysis: Questioning patients about prior self-treatment. In Gavin Brookes & Daniel Hunt (eds.), Analysing health communication, 19–48. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-68184-5_2Suche in Google Scholar

Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Alessandra Fermani & Philip Gill. 2020. Hypothetical questions in everyday Italian conversations. Lingua 246. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102951.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, F. Richard, Phyllis N. Butow, Stewart M. Dunn & Martin H. N. Tattersall. 2001. Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: A randomised trial. British Journal of Cancer 85(9). 1273–1279.10.1054/bjoc.2001.2073Suche in Google Scholar

Cegala, J. Donald. 1997. A study of doctors’ and patients’ patterns of information exchange and relational communication during a primary care consultation: Implications for communication skills training. Journal of Health Communication 2(3). 169–194.10.1080/108107397127743Suche in Google Scholar

Cegala, J. Donald, Leola McClure, Terese M. Marinelli & Douglas M. Post. 2000. The effects of communication skills training on patients’ participation during medical interviews. Patient Education and Counseling 41. 209–222.10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00093-8Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Xinren. 2004. The pragmatics of interactional overinformativeness. Xi’an. Shanxi Normal University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Zichen. 2020. Conceptual metaphors of illness and their social psychological effects. Social Sciences in Guangdong(6). 204–214.Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, C. Luke, Dana Gablasova & John Pill. 2023. Doing Questioning’ in the emergency department (ED). Health Communication 38(12). 2721–2729. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2111630.Suche in Google Scholar

Dillon, T. James. 1990. The practice of questioning. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

DiMatteo, R. M., Robert C. Reiter & Joseph C. Gambone. 1994. Enhancing medication adherence through communication and informed collaboration choice. Health Communication 6. 253–265.10.1207/s15327027hc0604_2Suche in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & John Heritage. 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Eggly, Susan, Louis A. Penner, Meredith Greene, Felicity W. K. Harper, John C. Ruckdeschel & Terrance L. Albrecht. 2006. Information seeking during ‘‘bad news’’ oncology interactions: Question asking by patients and their companions. Social Science & Medicine 63. 2974–2985.10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.012Suche in Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Susan & Alice F. Freed. 2009. The function of questions in institutional discourse: An introduction. In Alice Freed & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourses, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Feng, Qinghua. 2010. A practical coursebook on translation. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fiorentini, Ilaria & Andrea Sansò. 2017. Reformulation markers and their functions: Two case studies from Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 120. 54–72.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.010Suche in Google Scholar

Freed, F. Alice. 1994. The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 21. 219–242.10.1016/0378-2166(94)90101-5Suche in Google Scholar

Frosch, L. Dominick, Suepattra G. May, Katharine A. S. Rendle, Caroline Tietbohl & Glyn Elwyn. 2012. Authoritarian physicians and patients’ fear of being labeled ‘difficult’ among key obstacles to shared decision making. Health Affairs 31(5). 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0576.Suche in Google Scholar

Gobat, Nina, Kinnersley Paul, John W. Gregory & Michael R. Robling. 2015. What is agenda setting in the clinical encounter? Consensus from literature review and expert consultation. Patient Education and Counseling 98(7). 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.024.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles, Lisa Capps, David Goode, Anita Guynn, Harless Russell, Cathryn Houghton, Sally Jacoby, Minna Laakso, Melissa Lefko, Alycia Myhrer, Elinor Ochs, Kersten Priest, Curtis Renoe, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Jennifer Schlegel, Marja L. Sjoronson, Elizabeth Teas-Heaster, Most Especially & Candy Goodwin. 1995. Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(3). 233–260.10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2010. Questioning in medicine. In Alice Freed & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse, 42–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Douglas W. Maynard. 2006. Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607172Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Amanda McArthur. 2019. The diagnostic moment: A study in US primary care. Social Science & Medicine 228(1). 262–271.10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.022Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Geoffrey T. Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15–38.10.1177/019027250506800103Suche in Google Scholar

Ibrahim, M. A. Yassin. 2001. Doctor and patient questions as a measure of doctor-centredness in UAE hospitals. English for Specific Purposes 20(4). 331–344.10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00020-XSuche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Qingsheng, Yansheng Mao & Yihang Wang. 2024. “It’s nothing serious, take it easy”: Chinese doctors’ emotion-regulating discourses on the online medical consultation websites. Pragmatics. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23041.jia.Suche in Google Scholar

Kilner, Emily & Lorraine A. Sheppard. 2010. The role of teamwork and communication in the emergency department: A systematic review. International Emergency Nursing 18(3). 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2009.05.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Kinnell, M. K. Ann. 2002. Soliciting client questions in HIV prevention and test counseling. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(3). 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_5.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindström, Jan & Susanna Karlsson. 2016. Tensions in the epistemic domain and claims of no-knowledge: A study of Swedish medical interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindström, Anna & Ann Weatherall. 2015. Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions. Journal of Pragmatics 78. 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Mao, Yansheng, Wei Shuang & Xiaojiang Wang. 2023. Patients resist, doctors manage: The management of patient resistance by doctors in Chinese online medical consultation. Pragmatics and Society 15(3 & 4). 1–23.10.1075/ps.22042.maoSuche in Google Scholar

Mao, Yansheng & Kun Yang. 2017. Backchanneling and politeness in the interaction of medical consultation. In Xinren Chen (ed.), Politeness phenomena across Chinese genres: A variationist approach, 253–267. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

McGee, D. S. & Donald J. Cegala. 1998. Patient communication skills training for improved communication competence in the primary care medical consultation. Journal of Applied Communication Research 26(4). 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365517.Suche in Google Scholar

Mishler, Elliot. 1984. The discourse of medicine: Dialects of medical interviews. NewYork: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar

Park, Yujong. 2017. A closing-implicative practice in Korean primary medical care openings. Journal of Pragmatics 108. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Pun, Jack & Winnie Chor. 2020. Use of questioning between Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioners and patients to realize TCM philosophy: Holism, five elements and yin-yang in the context of doctor–patient communication. Health Communication 37(2). 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1828533.Suche in Google Scholar

Raymond, T. Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68(6). 939–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752.Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jeffrey. 2003. An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation. Health Communication 15(1). 27–59. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2.Suche in Google Scholar

Roter, Debra. 1977. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: The effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Education Monographs 5(4). 281–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817700500402.Suche in Google Scholar

Sarangi, Srikant. 2009. The spatial and temporal dimensions of reflective questions in genetic counselling. In Alice Freed & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse, 235–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0011Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, A. Emanuel. 2007. A primer for conversation analysis: Sequence organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2005. Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: One resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision. Health Communication 18(1). 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1801_3.Suche in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 3–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002Suche in Google Scholar

Street, L. Richard. 1991. Information-giving in medical consultations: The influence of patients’ communicative styles and personal characteristics. Science & Medicine 32(5). 541–548.10.1016/0277-9536(91)90288-NSuche in Google Scholar

Street, L. Richard, Edward Krupat, Robert A. Bell, Richard L. Kravitz & Haidet Paul. 2003. Beliefs about control in the physician–patient relationship: Effect on communication in medical encounters. Journal of General Internal Medicine 18(8). 609–616.10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20749.xSuche in Google Scholar

Street, L. Richard & Bradford Millay. 2001. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Communication 13(1). 61–73.10.1207/S15327027HC1301_06Suche in Google Scholar

Stubbe, Maria, Kevin Dew, Lindsay Macdonald & Anthony Dowell. 2021. Interactional sociolinguistics: Tracking patient-initiated questions across an episode of care. In Gavin Brookes & Daniel Hunt (eds.), Analysing health communication, 19–48. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-68184-5_3Suche in Google Scholar

Tantucci, Vittorio & Carmen Lepadat. 2024. Verbal engagement in doctor–patient interaction: Resonance in Western and traditional Chinese medicine. Journal of Pragmatics 230. 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.07.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Tietbohl, Caroline & Clara Bergen. 2022. “I was gonna ask you”: How patients use agency framing to display engagement in primary care. Social Science & Medicine 314. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115496.Suche in Google Scholar

Tracy, Marguerite, Julie Ayre, Olivia Mac, Tessa Copp, Emerita L. Trevena & Heather Shepherd. 2022. Question prompt lists and endorsement of question-asking support patients to get the information they seek—a longitudinal qualitative study. Health Expectations 25(4). 1652–1663. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13509.Suche in Google Scholar

Tsai, Mei-Hui. 2006. Opening hearts and minds: A linguistic framework for analyzing open questions in doctor-patient communication. Taiwan: Crane Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Tsai, Mei-Hui. 2010. Managing topics of birth and death in doctor-patient communication. Journal of Pragmatics 42(5). 1350–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang. 2022. Conceptual metonymy and emotive-affective meaning at the interface: Examples from online medical consultations. Lingua 168. 1–20.10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103192Suche in Google Scholar

van der Laaken, Manon & Bannink Anne. 2020. Openings in follow-up cancer consultations: The ‘How are you?’ question revisited. Discourse Studies 22(2). 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619893793.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Xiaojiang & Yansheng Mao. 2025. The more, the better: Overinformativeness by patients in Chinese online medical consultation. Onomázein 67. 1–17.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Xiaojiang, Yansheng Mao & Yu Qian. 2021. From conditions to strategies: Dominance implemented by Chinese doctors during online medical consultations. Journal of Pragmatics 182. 76–85.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.011Suche in Google Scholar

Wei, Shuang & Yansheng Mao. 2023. Small talk is a big deal: A discursive analysis of online off-topic doctor-patient interaction in traditional Chinese medicine. Social Science & Medicine 317(3). 1–8.10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115632Suche in Google Scholar

West, Candace. 1984. Medical misfires: Mishearings, misgivings and misunderstandings in physician-patient dialogues. Discourse Processes 7(2). 107–134.10.1080/01638538409544586Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Susan, John Weinman, Jeremy Dale & Newman Stanton. 1995. Patient expectations: What do primary care patients want from the GP and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction? Family Practice 12(2). 193–201.10.1093/fampra/12.2.193Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Xueping. 2011. Influence of positive and negative emotions on the choice of spatial demonstratives. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching (5). 31–34.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yu. 2020. How doctors do things with empathy in online medical consultations in China: A discourse-analytic approach. Health Communication 36. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1712527.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yu. 2024a. COVID-19 online medical consultation: Understanding the affective practice. Applied Linguistics 46. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae045.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yu. 2024b. COVID-19 online medical consultation in China: A discourse analysis perspective. Ibérica 48. 121–142. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.48.121.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-01-12
Accepted: 2025-06-18
Published Online: 2025-07-16

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 17.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2025-0003/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen