Abstract
There is little doubt that spatial information underlies a great deal of our processing of temporal information. Research on the ways in which timelines are associated with specific grammatical constructions has just started, and has brought forward new challenges for construction grammar. A true multimodal construction grammar cannot be developed using the same tools and mechanisms applied so far, but will require instead a fresh approach and a careful rethinking of the whole communicative process. It is our belief than in this transition from a narrow conception of linguistic communication to a broader and more complete view of communication “in the wild”, multimodal construction grammar will play an important role.
References
Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1). 1–28.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6Suche in Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1). 1–22.10.1006/cogp.2001.0748Suche in Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., O. Fuhrman & K. McCormick. 2011. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 118(1). 123–129.10.1037/e527342012-221Suche in Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. & M. Ramscar. 2002. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13(2). 185–189.10.1111/1467-9280.00434Suche in Google Scholar
Bottini, R. & D. Casasanto. 2010. Implicit spatial length modulates time estimates, but not vice versa. Spatial Cognition VII. 152–162.10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_15Suche in Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. 2000. Research design and issues of validity. In H. T. Reis & C. T. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 3–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & L. Boroditsky. 2008. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106. 579–593.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004Suche in Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & K. Jasmin. 2012. The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 643–674.10.1515/cog-2012-0020Suche in Google Scholar
Coulson, S. & C. Pagán Cánovas. 2013. Understanding timelines. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1–2). 198–219.10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.198Suche in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174220Suche in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 2009. Generalized integration networks. In V. Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 147–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.12fauSuche in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 57–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005Suche in Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O., K. McCormick, E. Chen, H. Jiang, D. Shu, S. Mao & L. Boroditsky. 2011. How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science 35. 1305–1328.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01193.xSuche in Google Scholar
Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7. 155–170.10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50026-1Suche in Google Scholar
Guyau, J. M. 1988 [1890]. The origin of the idea of time. Reprinted In J. A. Michon, V. Pouthas & J. L Jackson ((ed.)), Guyau and the idea of time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Suche in Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10). 1555–1577.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
McNeill David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Núñez, R. & K. Cooperrider. 2013. The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(5). 220–229.10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008Suche in Google Scholar
Núñez, R. E. & E. Sweetser. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30(3). 401–450.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62Suche in Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C. 2010. Erotic emissions in Greek poetry: A Generic Integration Network. Cognitive Semiotics 6. 7–32.10.1515/cogsem.2010.6.spring2010.7Suche in Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C. & M. F. Jensen. 2013. Anchoring time-space mappings and their emotions: The timeline blend in poetic metaphors. Language and Literature 22(1). 45–59.10.1177/0963947012469751Suche in Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C. & A. Piata. Forthcoming. The way time goes by: Conceptual integration and the poetics of time. In S. Csábi (ed.), New directions in cognition and poetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C. & M. Turner. 2016. Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In E. Pascual & S. Sandler (eds.), The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction, 45–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.55.03pagSuche in Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C., J. Valenzuela & J. Santiago. 2015. Like the machete the snake: Integration of topic and vehicle in poetry comprehension reveals meaning construction processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9(4). 385–393.10.1037/aca0000024Suche in Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. & A. Grafton. 2010. Cartographies of time: A history of the timeline. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Santiago, J., J. Lupiáñez, E. Pérez & M. J. Funes. 2007. Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14. 512–516.10.3758/BF03194099Suche in Google Scholar
Santiago, J., A. Román & M. Ouellet. 2011. Flexible foundations of abstract thought: A review and a theory. Spatial Dimensions of Social Thought 41–110.10.1515/9783110254310.39Suche in Google Scholar
Santiago, J., A. Román, M. Ouellet, N. Rodríguez & P. Pérez-Azor. 2010. In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research PRPF 74(1). 59–70.10.1007/s00426-008-0220-0Suche in Google Scholar
Teuscher, U., M. McQuire, J. Collins & S. Coulson. 2008. Congruity effects in time and space: Behavioral and ERP measures. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 32(3). 563–578.10.1080/03640210802035084Suche in Google Scholar
Torralbo, A., J. Santiago & J. Lupiáñez. 2006. Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science 30(4). 745–757.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67Suche in Google Scholar
Turner, M. 2014. The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity, and the human spark. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Tversky, B., S. Kugelmass & A. Winter. 1991. Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology 23. 515–557.10.1016/0010-0285(91)90005-9Suche in Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. & C. Maienborn. 2010. Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition 117(2). 126–138.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.001Suche in Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J., C. Pagán Cánovas & I. Olza In review. Gesturing the timeline: Gestures co-occurring with temporal demarcative expressions provide evidence for anchoring and viewpoint integration.Suche in Google Scholar
Walker, E. & K. Cooperrider. 2016. The continuity of metaphor: Evidence from temporal gestures. Cognitive Science 40(2). 481–49510.1111/cogs.12254Suche in Google Scholar
Weger, U. W. & J. Pratt. 2008. Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(2). 426–430.10.3758/PBR.15.2.426Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9. 625–636.10.3758/BF03196322Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & V. L. Patel. 2006. Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Pragmatics & Cognition 14(2). 333–341.10.1075/bct.16.11zhaSuche in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Multimodality and construction grammar
- Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory
- Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions
- Apposition: A multimodal construction? The multimodality of linguistic constructions in the light of usage-based theory
- Is there a multimodal construction based on non-deictic so in German?
- Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns
- On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]
- Timelines and multimodal constructions: Facing new challenges
- Multimodal form-meaning pairs for blended classic joint attention
- Multimodal rhetoric: Fictive interaction strategies in political discourse
- The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture?
- The shrug as marker of obviousness
- Multimodal Construction Grammar issues are Construction Grammar issues
- Do we really need a Multimodal Construction Grammar?
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Multimodality and construction grammar
- Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory
- Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions
- Apposition: A multimodal construction? The multimodality of linguistic constructions in the light of usage-based theory
- Is there a multimodal construction based on non-deictic so in German?
- Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns
- On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]
- Timelines and multimodal constructions: Facing new challenges
- Multimodal form-meaning pairs for blended classic joint attention
- Multimodal rhetoric: Fictive interaction strategies in political discourse
- The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture?
- The shrug as marker of obviousness
- Multimodal Construction Grammar issues are Construction Grammar issues
- Do we really need a Multimodal Construction Grammar?