References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R. M. W.Dixon & MasayukiOnishi.2001. Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.46Suche in Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery.1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In TimothyShopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1: Clause structure: 62–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery.2007. The major functions of the noun phrase. In TimothyShopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (2nd edn.), Vol. 1: Clause structure: 132–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.003Suche in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis.1995. Éléments de syntaxe générale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Suche in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis.2006. Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. 2 vols. Paris: Hermès Science.Suche in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia.2011. Language universals and linguistic knowledge. In Song (ed.)2011, 227–249.Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William.1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William.2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W.1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S.1997. Are grammatical relations universal?In JoanL.Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A.Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 115–143. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.82.09drySuche in Google Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N.2006. Subjects and universal grammar: An explanatory theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486265Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy.1995. Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.74Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin.1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884210Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin.2010. Framework-free grammatical theory. In BerndHeine & HeikoNarrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin.2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology15. 535–567.Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A.Thompson.1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language56. 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Suche in Google Scholar

Kazenin, Konstantin I.1994. Split syntactic ergativity: Toward an implicational hierarchy. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung47. 78–98.10.1524/stuf.1994.47.2.78Suche in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L.1976. Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In Li (ed.)1976, 303–333.Suche in Google Scholar

Kittilä, Seppo.2011. Transitivity typology. In Song (ed.)2011, 346–367.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.1993. La zone objectale. Actances7. 15–34. http://lacito.vjf.cnrs.fr/actances/Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.1994. L’actance. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.1995. La notion de distance actancielle. In JanineBouscaren, Jean-JacquesFranckel & StéphaneRobert (eds.), Langues et langages – Problèmes et raisonnements en linguistique: Mélanges offerts à Antoine Culioli, 135–146. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Reprinted in Gilbert Lazard, Études de linguistique générale, Vol. 1: Typologie grammaticale, 387–398. Leuven: Peeters, 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.1998. Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808100Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.2002. Transitivity revisited as an example of a more strict approach in typological research. Folia Linguistica36. 141–190. Reprinted in Lazard (2012a), 139–188.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.2006. La quête des invariants interlangues: La linguistique est-elle une science?Paris: Champion.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.2011a. Horizons de la linguistique. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris106(1). 39–94. Reprinted in Lazard (2012a), 247–302.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.2011b. Vers une science des langues. Un exemple: La transitivité. Faits de langues38. 17–27.10.1163/19589514-038-01-900000003Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.2012a. Études de linguistique générale, Vol. 2: La linguistique pure. Leuven: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.2012b. The case for pure linguistics. Studies in Language36. 241–259.10.1075/sl.36.2.02lazSuche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert.2014. Considérations insolites sur les avatars de la linguistique. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris109(1). 89–120.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka RappaportHovav.2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

MonodBecquelin, Aurore & CédricBecquey.2012. Case patterns and verb classes in Trumai. In GillesAuthier & KatharinaHaude (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice, 289–322. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110227734.289Suche in Google Scholar

Næss, Åshild.2007. Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.72Suche in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria, Carlos GómezGallo, PeterGraff & EkaterinaKravtchenko.2012. Subject preference and ergativity. Lingua122. 267–277.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.11.004Suche in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de.1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. 5th edn., 1960.Suche in Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul.1976. The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor topic, or none of the above. In Li (ed.)1976, 491–518.Suche in Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul.1977. Reference-related and role-related properties of subject. In PeterCole & Jerrold M.Sadock (eds.), Grammatical relations (Syntax and semantics 8), 279–306. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368866_012Suche in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi.1982. Japanese grammar and universal grammar. Lingua57. 103–123.10.1016/0024-3841(82)90002-XSuche in Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung (ed.). 2011. The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. JR. 1993. Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.82Suche in Google Scholar