Startseite Thermal-hydraulic and safety analysis of alternative ceramic fuels in next generation of VVER-1000 reactor
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Thermal-hydraulic and safety analysis of alternative ceramic fuels in next generation of VVER-1000 reactor

  • Ahmad Rahimi , Mohsen Kheradmand Saadi EMAIL logo , Ebrahim Heidari EMAIL logo und Kavoos Abbasi
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. November 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The main aim of this study is the thermohydraulic and safety analysis of alternative UN and UC ceramic fuels in the next generation of VVER-1000/V446 reactor core. One of the advantages of these alternative fuels is their higher thermal conductivity and density relative to the UO2 conventional fuels. Thermohydraulic analysis has been performed under full power conditions. Also, the safety evaluation of alternative ceramic fuels has been researched by the Rod Ejection Accident (REA) scenario. RELAP5 Mod3.2 code is used for thermo-hydraulic analysis in both steady state and transient state in VVER-1000/V446 reactor. In addition, calculations of the fuel center temperature in mean and hot channels for steady state, the temperature of the hottest rod in the fuel assembly, the radial distribution of fuel temperature for both channels, and the maximum clad temperature during the reactivity injection have been performed. The results showed that in the steady state with full power, the fuel centreline temperature in UO2 is about twice the corresponding values for UN and UC alternative fuels which is very attractive from a safety point of view. In general, due to the large difference between the hot spot point and the melting point in alternative fuels, the thermal power and safety factors can be significantly increased in the next generation of VVER-1000/V446 reactors.


Corresponding authors: Mohsen Kheradmand Saadi, Department of Nuclear Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, E-mail: ; and Ebrahim Heidari, Department of Sciences, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: A. Rahimi: Methodology, Software, Investigation, Resources, Writing – Original Draft. M. Kheradmand Saadi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing – Review & Editing. E. Heidari: Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. K. Abbasi: Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Data available upon request.

References

AEOI (2003). Final safety analysis Report (FSAR). Chapter 4.Suche in Google Scholar

Al-Qasir, I., Gillette, V., and Qteish, A.J. (2019). Thermal neutron scattering kernels for uranium mono-nitride: a potential advanced tolerant fuel candidate for light water reactors. Ann. Nucl. Energy 127: 68–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.047.Suche in Google Scholar

Altaha, S.M. and Pazirandeh, A.J. (2011). REA analysis of the Iranian VVER-1000 core by modification of PRORIA code for annular pellets. Ann. Nucl. Energy 38: 1930–1938, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.05.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Castro, L., Delgado, G., García, C., and Dominguez, D.S. (2019). Thermal analysis of ceramic nuclear fuels for the HPLWR. Ann. Nucl. Energy 127: 227–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.12.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Rahimi, A., Heidari, E., Kheradmandsaadi, M., and Abbasi, K. (2023). Neutronic analysis of alternative ceramic fuels in the next generation of VVER-1000/V446 reactor. Phys. Scr. 98: 115301, https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acf9cd.Suche in Google Scholar

Saadi, M.K. and Bashiri, B. (2016). Neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analysis of alternative ceramic fuels in the next-generation of light water reactors. Prog. Nucl. Energy 87: 89–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2015.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Saadi, M.K., Shahriari, M., and Zolfaghari, A.R. (2010). Xenon transient simulation of the VVER-1000 nuclear reactor using adiabatic approximation. Ann. Nucl. Energy 37: 753–761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.01.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Tabadar, Z., Hadad, K., Nematollahi, M., Jabbari, M., Khaleghi, M., and Hashemi-Tilehnoee, M. (2012). Simulation of a control rod ejection accident in a VVER-1000/V446 using RELAP5/Mod3.2. Ann. Nucl. Energy 45: 106–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.02.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Tikhonov, N. (2011). WWER-1000 reactor simulator. IAEA-training course at milano politechnico. Chapter 15.Suche in Google Scholar

Toyama, M., Shimizu, S., Yoshizu, T., Naito, T., and Otsuka, S. (2009). Next-generation pressurized water reactor (PWR)-Development of environmentally-friendly, highly effective, economical, and 3S achievable autonomic type plant. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Technical Rev. 46, https://www.mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e464/e464001.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-07-11
Accepted: 2024-10-08
Published Online: 2024-11-14
Published in Print: 2024-12-17

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 29.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kern-2024-0082/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen