Startseite Pregnant women’s knowledge and behaviour to prevent cytomegalovirus infection: an observational study
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Pregnant women’s knowledge and behaviour to prevent cytomegalovirus infection: an observational study

  • Flaminia Vena ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Valentina D’Ambrosio , Cristina Pajno , Chiara Boccherini , Sara Corno , Daniele Di Mascio , Maria Grazia Piccioni , Maria Giovanna Salerno , Francesco Bisogni , Roberto Brunelli , Ludovico Muzii , Pierluigi Benedetti Panici , Antonio Pizzuti und Antonella Giancotti
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. Oktober 2020

Abstract

Objectives

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection can negatively affect pregnancy outcomes, but may be prevented by simple precautions. Literature suggests that gynaecologists do not always adequately inform about preventive behaviour and most pregnant women have a low-level knowledge regarding cCMV infection. The aim of this study is to evaluate knowledge and risk behaviours related to cCMV infection in an unselected group of pregnant women.

Methods

An institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted in three Maternal and Fetal Divisions in Rome between November and February 2019 on 296 pregnant women, their knowledge on cCMV was measured using six cytomegalovirus (CMV) related questions.

Results

Out of the 296 respondents, 59.1% had heard, read or seen information about cCMV infection. Regarding the way of transmission, 96/296 (32.4%) correctly recognize children as a potential source of the infection but only 25/296 (8.44%) knew all prevention practices, 28/296 (9.5%) of women reported that they have never performed cCMV test during pregnancy.

Conclusions

The results of this survey show that knowledge on cCMV infection among pregnant women is poor. This highlights the need to improve counselling on all preventive practices for cCMV infection during perinatal care consultation.


Corresponding author: Flaminia Vena, MD, Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, Phone: +0039 3886063851, E-mail: .

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was deemed exempt from ethical approval.

References

1. Alford, CA, Stagno, S, Pass, RF, Britt, WJ. Congenital and perinatal cytomegalovirus infections. Rev Infect Dis 1990;12:S745–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/12.supplement_7.s745.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Peckham, CS. Cytomegalovirus infection: congenital and neonatal disease. Scand J Infect Suppl 1991;78:82–7. PMID:1666449.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Ludwig, A, Hengel, H. Epidemiological impact and disease burden of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Europe. Euro Surveill 2009;14:26–32. https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.14.09.19140-en.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Rahav, G. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection--a question of screening. Isr Med Assoc J 2007;9:392–4. PMID:17591383.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Kenneson, A, Cannon, MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 2007;17:253–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.535.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Bruxmann, H, Hamprecht, K, Meyer-Wittkopf, M, Friese, K. Primary human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection in pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017;114:45–52. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0045.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Kenneson, A, Cannon, MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 2007;17:253–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.535.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Enders, G, Daiminger, A, Bäder, U, Exler, S, Enders, M. Intrauterine transmission and clinical outcome of 248 pregnancies with primary cytomegalovirus infection in relation to gestational age. J Clin Virol 2011;52:244–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Pass, RF, Arav-Boger, R. Maternal and fetal cytomegalovirus infection: diagnosis, management, and prevention. F1000 Res 2018;7:255. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12517.1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Boppana, SB, Rivera, LB, Fowler, KB, Mach, M, Britt, WJ. Intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus to infants of women with preconceptional immunity. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1366–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200105033441804.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Lazzarotto, T, Varani, S, Guerra, B, Nicolosi, A, Lanari, M, Landini, MP. Prenatal indicators of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2000a;137:90–5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2000.107110.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Smithers-Sheedy, H, Raynes-Greenow, C, Badawi, N, Khandaker, G, Menzies, R, Jones, CA. Cytomegalovirus-related childhood mortality in Australia 1999–2011. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:901–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12896.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Mazzitelli, M, Micieli, M, Votino, C, Visconti, F, Quaresima, P, Strazzulla, A, et al. Knowledge of human cytomegalovirus infection and prevention in pregnant women: a baseline, operational survey. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2017;2017:5495927. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5495927 [Epub 2017 Jul 31].Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Cordier, AG, Guitton, S, Vauloup-Fellous, C, Grangeot-Keros, L, Ayoubi, JM, Benachi, A, et al. Awareness of cytomegalovirus infection among pregnant women in France. J Clin Virol 2012;53:332–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.12.031.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Pereboom, MTR, Manniën, J, Spelten, ER, Schellevis, FG, Hutton, EK. Observational study to assess pregnant women’s knowledge and behaviour to prevent toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and cytomegalovirus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-98.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Nigro, G, Adler, SP, La Torre, R, Best, AM, Congenital Cytomegalovirus Collaborating Group. Passive immunization during pregnancy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1350–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa043337.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Hamprecht, K, Kagan, KO, Goelz, R. Hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital CMV infection. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2543. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1405377.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Fox, S, Jones, S. The social life of health information [Online]; 2009. Available from: https://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx2009.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Cannon, MJ, Westbrook, K, Levis, D, Schleiss, MR, Thackeray, R, Pass, RF. Awareness of and behaviors related to child-to-mother transmission of cytomegalovirus. Prev Med 2012;54:351–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.009 PMID: 22465669.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Doutre, S, Barrett, T, Greenlee, J, White, K. Losing ground: awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus in the United States. J Early Hear Detect Interv 2016;1:39–48. https://doi.org/10.15142/T32G62.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Tastad, KJ, Schleiss, MR, Lammert, SM, Basta, NE. Awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus and acceptance of maternal and newborn screening. PLoS One 2019;14:e0221725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221725.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2020-06-29
Accepted: 2020-09-17
Published Online: 2020-10-23
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Clinical evaluation of labor: an evidence- and experience-based approach
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. How fever is defined in COVID-19 publications: a disturbing lack of precision
  6. Initial review of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection
  7. Usefulness of COVID-19 screen-and-test approach in pregnant women: an experience from a country with low COVID-19 burden
  8. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term X: microbiology, clinical signs, placental pathology, and neonatal bacteremia – implications for clinical care
  9. Cytokine profiling: variation in immune modulation with preterm birth vs. uncomplicated term birth identifies pivotal signals in pathogenesis of preterm birth
  10. Hyperechoic amniotic membranes in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes (p-PROM) and pregnancy outcome
  11. A novel technique for prediction of preterm birth: fetal nasal flow Doppler
  12. Pregnant women’s knowledge and behaviour to prevent cytomegalovirus infection: an observational study
  13. Reference intervals and reliability of cavum septi pellucidi volume measurements by three-dimensional ultrasound between 19 and 24 weeks’ gestation
  14. First-trimester presentation of ultrasound findings in trisomy 13 and validation of multiparameter ultrasound-based risk calculation models to detect trisomy 13 in the late first trimester
  15. Pre-operative tranexemic acid vs. etamsylate in reducing blood loss during elective cesarean section: randomized controlled trial
  16. External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study
  17. The influence of race on cervical length in pregnant women in Brazil
  18. Original Articles – Fetus
  19. A 24-segment fractional shortening of the fetal heart using FetalHQ
  20. Original Articles – Neonates
  21. Antenatal corticosteroids and short-term neonatal outcomes in term and near-term infants of diabetic mothers. Analysis of the Qatar PEARL-peristat registry
  22. Acute respiratory effect of transpyloric feeding for respiratory exacerbation in preterm infants
  23. Quality improvement for reducing utilization drift in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy management
  24. Letter to the Editor
  25. Cross transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and obstetric ultrasound
  26. ‘Getting to zero’ cross transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in obstetric ultrasound during COVID-19 pandemic
Heruntergeladen am 12.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0301/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen