Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik A distributional analysis of vowel quantity in a corpus of Latin texts
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A distributional analysis of vowel quantity in a corpus of Latin texts

  • Giovanna Marotta EMAIL logo und Irene De Felice
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. September 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The paper examines the relationship between vowel quantity, syllable structure and lexical stress in Latin through a quantitative analysis carried out on a corpus of literary texts taken from Cicero’s Epistulae ad familiares and Petronius’ Cena Trimalchionis. Each word of the corpus was split into syllables and phonemes. Then, the corpus was annotated with phonological and prosodic information pertaining to vowel length, syllable structure, stress and word length. Finally, the data collected were analyzed at different levels. The results are discussed in light of the findings of a previous analysis carried out on dictionary entries, confirming a close correlation between syllable structure and lexical stress, since the great majority of stressed syllables are heavy both in the literary corpus and in the dictionary. Moreover, long vowels are more frequently found in open and stressed syllables, particularly in paroxytones. The data suggest that the process leading to the loss of vowel quantity was already active (at least in some strata of Roman society) in the Latin of the Classical age, since a prosodic template similar to that occurring in many Romance developments emerges even in literary Latin texts.


Corresponding author: Giovanna Marotta, Department of Philology, Literature and Linguistics, University of Pisa, Via Santa Maria 36, Pisa, Itay, E-mail:

References

Adams, James N. & Nigel Vincent. 2016. Early and Late Latin: Continuity or change? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316450826Suche in Google Scholar

Allen, William S. 1978. Vox Latina: The pronunciation of Classical Latin, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620348Suche in Google Scholar

Barchi, Serena & Lucia Tamponi. Forthcoming. Shaping shapes. Sicilicus and other diacritics in Latin epigraphy. In Giovanbattista Galdi, Simon Aerts & Alessandro Papini (eds.), Varietate delectamur: Multifarious approaches to synchronic and diachronic variation in Latin. Selected papers from the 14th International Colloquium on Late and Vulgar Latin (Ghent, 2022). Turnhout: Brepols.Suche in Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 206–244. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631201267.1996.00008.xSuche in Google Scholar

Cser, András. 2009. The phonology of Classical Latin. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

De Felice, Irene. 2018. Strutture sillabiche nel lessico latino. In Lidia Costamagna, Alessandro Marcaccio, Stefania Scaglione & Barbara Turchetta (eds.), Mutamento linguistico e biodiversità. Atti del XLI Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, 235–241. Roma: Il Calamo.Suche in Google Scholar

Dietsch, Rudolf (ed.). 1911. M. Tulli Ciceronis Epistolae selectae. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Sam Rosenthall. 1999. Phonetics and phonology of main stress in Italian. Phonology 16. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675799003681.Suche in Google Scholar

Fattori, Marco. 2021. What are we talking about when we talk about ‘iambic shortening’? A review of the primary evidence. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 59(2). 97–132.Suche in Google Scholar

Fattori, Marco. 2022. Studi su accento e correptio iambica in Plauto. Bologna: Pàtron.Suche in Google Scholar

Fortson, Benjamin W. 2011. Latin prosody and metrics. In James Clackson (ed.), A companion to the Latin language, 92–104. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343397.ch7Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, József. 1968. Statistique et diachronie: Essai sur l’évolution du vocalisme dans la latinité tardive. Word 24. 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1968.11435528.Suche in Google Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich. 1969. Romanische Sprachwissenschaft. Band 1: Einleitung und Vokalismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783111377377Suche in Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, Romano. 1956. La ‘geminatio vocalium’ nelle iscrizioni latine. Annali della Scuola Normale di Pisa 25. 124–135.Suche in Google Scholar

Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. München: Beck.Suche in Google Scholar

Loporcaro, Michele. 2011. Syllable, segment and prosody. In Martin Maiden, John C. Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, 50–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521800723.004Suche in Google Scholar

Loporcaro, Michele. 2015. Vowel length from Latin to Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656554.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna. 1985. Modelli e misure ritmiche. La durata vocalica in italiano. Bologna: Zanichelli.Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna. 1999. The Latin syllable. In Harry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter (eds.), The syllable: Views and facts, 285–310. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110806793.285Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna. 2000. Sulla massimalità dei piedi trocaici: Il caso del latino. Lingua e Stile 35(3). 387–416.Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna. 2006. L’algoritmo accentuale latino nel confronto di due teorie fonologiche. In Renato Oniga & Luigi Zennaro (eds.), Atti della Giornata di Linguistica Latina, 133–158. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna. 2015. Talking stones. Phonology in Latin inscriptions? Studi e Saggi Linguistici 58(2). 39–63.Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna. 2016. Prosodic structure. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 484–494. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0026Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna. 2018. On Cicero’s fine-grained perception of the prosodic features in Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 17(2). 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2018-0007.Suche in Google Scholar

Marotta, Giovanna & Irene De Felice. 2019. Patterns of prosodic distribution of Latin long vowels. In Nigel Holmes, Marijke Ottink, Josine Schrickx & Maria Selig (eds.), Lemmata linguistica latina. Vol. 1: Words and sounds, 436–452. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110647587-027Suche in Google Scholar

Mester, Armin. 1994. The quantitative trochee in Latin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992745.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Konrad. 1995. Petronii Arbitri Satyricon reliquiae. Stuttgart & Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Pocket Oxford Latin Dictionary. 2012. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191739583.001.0001/acref-9780191739583 (accessed 1 June 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Pulgram, Ernst. 1975. Latin-Romance phonology: Prosodics and metrics. Munich: Fink.Suche in Google Scholar

Vincent, Nigel. 1988. Non-linear phonology in diachronic perspective; stress and word structure in Latin and Italian. In Pier Marco Bertinetto & Michele Loporcaro (eds.), Certamen phonologicum. Papers from the 1987 Cortona Phonology Meeting, 421–432. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Suche in Google Scholar

Vineis, Edoardo. 1984. Problemi di ricostruzione della fonologia del latino volgare. In Edoardo Vineis (ed.), Latino volgare, latino medioevale, lingue romanze: Atti del convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, 45–62. Pisa: Giardini.Suche in Google Scholar

Wesenberg, D. Albert. 1885. Marci Tullii Ciceronis epistolae, vol. 1. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Weiss, Michael. 2009. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin (2020, 2nd edition). Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Winge, Johan. 2015. Automatic annotation of Latin vowel length. Uppsala: Uppsala University thesis. https://cl.lingfil.uu.se/exarb/arch/winge2015.pdf (accessed 1 June 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-09-05
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.2.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joll-2023-2002/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen