Jointly managed congestion and contention in optical burst switching with proposed proactive framework (Pro-JCCM) for the high-speed transport networks
-
Amit Kumar Garg
Abstract
Optical burst switching (OBS) shows a lot of promise for the future of the optical internet, still it comes with few challenges, such as contention and congestion, which can lead to a higher burst drop probability (BDP). Existing solutions tend to solve these issues separately and reactively, which limits their effectiveness. This paper introduces a new approach called the proactive framework for joint congestion and contention management (Pro-JCCM). Pro-JCCM focuses on two main components: a network state estimator (NSE) that calculates a combined congestion and contention index (CCI) for network routes, and an adaptive burst scheduling and dropping (ABSD) module that operates at the edge nodes. By proactively monitoring the CCI, the ABSD module makes smart decisions, like adjusting burst offset times or dropping low-priority bursts before they reach the network core. Simulations conducted on the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNET) topology show that the proposed Pro-JCCM outperforms traditional reactive methods, reducing packet drop rates by up to tenfold and increasing network throughput by over 30 % during peak loads, all while ensuring consistent end-to-end delays for improved quality of service (QoS).
Acknowledgments
Discrete Event Simulation Tool (network tool), NSFNET topology.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Cisco. Cisco annual internet report White Paper. San Jose, CA, USA: Cisco; 2020.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Qiao, C, Yoo, M. Optical burst switching (OBS) – a new paradigm for an optical internet. J High-Speed Netw 1999;8:69–84.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Chen, Y, Turner, JS. Wavelength-aware grooming in WDM rings. IEEE J Sel Area Commun 2004;22:1471–83.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Sairam, KVSSSS. A survey of contention resolution policies in optical burst switched networks. J Netw Syst Manag 2013;21:321–50.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Chlamtac, I, Fumagalli, A, Suh, CJ. A multilength optical buffer architecture for resolving contention in WDM networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 2003;11:652–64.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Danielsen, SL, Joergensen, C, Buxens, A, Stubkjaer, KE. Wavelength conversion in optical packet switching. J Lightwave Technol 1998;16:2095–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/50.736578.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Yu, X, Chen, Y, Qiao, C. A study of traffic statistics of assembled bursts in optical burst switched networks. In: Proceedings of the SPIE optical networking and communications conference (OptiComm 2002). Boston, MA, USA; 2002. p. 115–24.10.1117/12.475293Suche in Google Scholar
8. El-Bawab, TS. Deflection routing-based contention resolution in optical burst-switched networks: a survey. Opt Switch Netw 2008;5:3–21.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Detti, A, Eramo, V, Listanti, M. Performance evaluation of a new technique for IP support in a WDM optical network: optical burst switching (OBS). J Lightwave Technol 2002;20:154–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/50.983228.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Phung, MH, Chua, KC. Scheduling for QoS in optical burst-switched networks. IEEE Commun Mag 2005;43:S30–5.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Duser, M, Bayvel, P. Analysis of a dynamically wavelength-routed optical burst-switched network. J Lightwave Technol 2002;20:574–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/50.996576.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Ade, R, Gupta, PK. A machine learning approach for burst loss prediction in OBS networks. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE India council international conference (INDICON). New Delhi, India; 2020. p. 1–6.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Zhang, T, Yang, K, Zhao, L. A QoS-aware routing and wavelength assignment algorithm for optical burst switching networks. Comput Netw 2008;52:2546–58.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Zaidi, A, Shah, SAR, Kwak, KS. Dynamic optical network slicing for differentiated 5G and beyond services: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tuts 2023;25:648–82.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Ayoub, O, Jarray, A, Jmal, R, Abdel-Aziz, M, Jaouën, Y, Hamdi, M. Machine learning-based quality of transmission estimation in optical networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tuts 2021;23:930–67.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Chaves, JMR, de, FM, Bezerra, J, Neto, FLS, Maciel, TFF, Sobrinho, EP, et al.. Proactive QoS for 5G and beyond: a reinforcement learning approach for URLLC/eMBB coexistence. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2022. p. 1432–7.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Monti, P, Tombaz, S, Wosinska, L, Zibar, D, Vlachos, K, Spadaro, S, et al.. The 5G-Crosshaul transport network for a densified 5G RAN. IEEE Commun Mag 2018;56:92–9.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
