Startseite A controlled deflection routing and wavelength assignment based scheme in Optical Burst Switched (OBS) networks
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A controlled deflection routing and wavelength assignment based scheme in Optical Burst Switched (OBS) networks

  • Bakhe Nleya , Philani Khumalo EMAIL logo und Andrew Mutsvangwa
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Juli 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Heterogeneous IoT-enabled networks generally accommodate both jitter tolerant and intolerant traffic. Optical Burst Switched (OBS) backbone networks handle the resultant volumes of such traffic by transmitting it in huge size chunks called bursts. Because of the lack of or limited buffering capabilities within the core network, burst contentions may frequently occur and thus affect overall supportable quality of service (QoS). Burst contention(s) in the core network is generally characterized by frequent burst losses as well as differential delays especially when traffic levels surge. Burst contention can be resolved in the core network by way of partial buffering using fiber delay lines (FDLs), wavelength conversion using wavelength converters (WCs) or deflection routing. In this paper, we assume that burst contention is resolved by way of deflecting contending bursts to other less congested paths even though this may lead to differential delays incurred by bursts as they traverse the network. This will contribute to undesirable jitter that may ultimately compromise overall QoS. Noting that jitter is mostly caused by deflection routing which itself is a result of poor wavelength and routing assigning, the paper proposes a controlled deflection routing (CDR) and wavelength assignment based scheme that allows the deflection of bursts to alternate paths only after controller buffer preset thresholds are surpassed. In this way, bursts (or burst fragments) intended for a common destination are always most likely to be routed on the same or least cost path end-to-end. We describe the scheme as well as compare its performance to other existing approaches. Overall, both analytical and simulation results show that the proposed scheme does lower both congestion (on deflection routes) as well as jitter, thus also improving throughput as well as avoiding congestion on deflection paths.


Corresponding author: Philani Khumalo, Durban University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Durban, South Africa, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Hirata, K, Matsuda, T, Takine, T. Dynamic burst discarding scheme for deflection routing in optical burst switching networks. Opt Switch Netw 2007;4:106–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2007.01.001.10.1016/j.osn.2007.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

2. Haeri, S, Trajkovi´, L. Intelligent deflection routing in buffer-less networks. IEEE Trans Cybern 2015;45:316–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2014.2360680.10.1109/TCYB.2014.2360680Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Ouveysi, I, Shu, F, Chen, W, Xiang, G, Zukerman, M. Topology and routing optimization for congestion minimization in optical wireless networks. Opt Switch Netw 2010;7:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2010.02.002.10.1016/j.osn.2010.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

4. Lezama, F, Casta, G, Sarmiento, A, Indayara, B, Martins, B. Differential evolution optimization applied to the routing and spectrum allocation problem in flexgrid optical networks. Photonic Netw Commun 2016;31:129–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-015-0558-3.10.1007/s11107-015-0558-3Suche in Google Scholar

5. Christodoulopoulos, K, Varvarigos, E, Vlachos, K. New burst assembly scheme based on the average packet delay and its performance for tcp traffic. Opt Switch Netw 2007;4:200–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2007.05.001.10.1016/j.osn.2007.05.001Suche in Google Scholar

6. Dutta, MK, Chaubey, VK. Design and performance analysis of deflection routing based intelligent optical burst switched (OBS) network. In: International conference on devices and communications (ICDeCom). IEEE, Mesra, India; 2011.10.1109/ICDECOM.2011.5738530Suche in Google Scholar

7. Mandloi, A, Mishra, V. A Segmentation based channel scheduling scheme in optical burst switching networks. Int J Comput Appl Technol 2012;51:11–8. https://doi.org/10.5120/8045-1363.10.5120/8045-1363Suche in Google Scholar

8. Hou, R, Zheng, M, Mao, T. A controlled retransmission scheme for burs segmentation in OBS networks on consideration of path relevance. In: IEICE transactions on fundamentals of electronics communications and computer sciences. Tokyo, Japan: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers; 2015.10.1587/transfun.E98.A.676Suche in Google Scholar

9. Casares-Ginner, V. Some teletraffic issues in optical burst switching with burst segmentation. Electron Lett 2016;52:941–3. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2016.0137.10.1049/el.2016.0137Suche in Google Scholar

10. Li, S, Zukerman, M, Wang, M, Womg, EWM. Improving Throughput and Effective Utilization in OBS Networks. Opt Switch Netw 2015;18:222–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2015.07.005.10.1016/j.osn.2015.07.005Suche in Google Scholar

11. Borgonovo, F, Fratta, L, Bannister, JA. Unslotted deflection routing in all-optical networks. In: Proceeding. of IEEE’s global communications conference (GLOBECOM’93). IEEE, Houston, Texas, USA; 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Chen, Y, Wu, H, Xu, D, Qiao, C. Performance analysis of optical burst switched node with deflection routing. In: Proceedings of IEEE’s international conference on communications (ICC’03). IEEE, Anchorage, Alaska, USA; 2003.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Zalesky, A, Vu, HL, Rosberg, Z, Wong, E, Zukerman, M. Stabilizing deflection routing in optical burst switched networks. IEEE J Sel Area Commun 2007;25:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac-ocn.2007.025606.10.1109/JSAC-OCN.2007.025606Suche in Google Scholar

14. Du, Y, Zhu, C, Zheng, X, Guo, Y, Zhang, H. A novel load balancing deflection routing strategy in optical burst switching networks. In: National fiber optic engineers conference, NFOEC’07. Optical Society of America, Anaheim, CA, USA; 2007.10.1109/OFC.2007.4348467Suche in Google Scholar

15. Wu, G, Dai, W, Li, X, Chen, J. A maximum-efficiency-first multi-path route selection strategy for optical burst switching networks. Optik – Int J Light Electron Optic 2014;125:2229–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.10.050.10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.10.050Suche in Google Scholar

16. Gan, AH, Wang, BY, Wang, T. Contention resolution and burst assembly scheme based on burst segmentation in optical burst switching networks. Optik – Int J Light Electron Optic 2013;124:1749–54.10.1016/j.ijleo.2012.05.052Suche in Google Scholar

17. Vokkarane, V, Jue, J, Sitaraman, S. Burst segmentation: an approach for reducing packet loss in optical burst switched networks. In: IEEE international conference on communications. IEEE, New York, USA; 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Cameron, C, Zalesky, A, Zukerman, M. Shortest path prioritized random deflection routing (SP-PRDR) in optical burst switched networks. In: 3rd international workshop on optical burst switching (WOBS). ICST, San Jose; 2004. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Haeri, S, Wong, W, Thong, K, Chen, G. A reinforcement learning-based algorithm for deflection routing in optical burst-switched networks. In: IEEE 14th international conference on information reuse & integration (IRI). IEEE, San Francisco, CA; 2013.10.1109/IRI.2013.6642508Suche in Google Scholar

20. Barpanda, RS, Turuk, AK, Saho, B. Analysis of wavelength reservation-based quality of service differentiation in optical burst switching networks using markov model. Egypt Inf J 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2016.06.006.10.1016/j.eij.2016.06.006Suche in Google Scholar

21. Barpanda, RS, Turuk, AK, Saho, B. QoS aware routing and wavelength allocation in optical burst switching networks using differential evolution optimization. Digital Commun Network 2018;4:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2017.09.002.10.1016/j.dcan.2017.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

22. Nleya, B, Mutsvangwa, A. Enhanced congestion management for minimizing network performance degradation in OBS networks. SAIEE ARJ 2018;109:48–57. https://doi.org/10.23919/SAIEE.2018.8531799.10.23919/SAIEE.2018.8531799Suche in Google Scholar

23. Sibanda, H, Nleya, B. Model analysis of dynamic priority segmented burstification and deflection routing. In: Proceedings of IEEE Africon 2017. IEEE, Cape Town, South Africa; 2017.10.1109/AFRCON.2017.8095503Suche in Google Scholar

24. Choudhury, S, Nair, V, Mal, A. Routing scheme for OBS networks. J Opt Commun Netw 2012;4:799–811. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.4.000799.10.1364/JOCN.4.000799Suche in Google Scholar

25. Efrosinin, DV, Farkhadov, MP, Stepanova, NV. A study of a controllable queueing system with unreliable heterogeneous servers. Autom Rem Contr 2018;79:265–85. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0005117918020066.10.1134/S0005117918020066Suche in Google Scholar

26. Li, S, Wang, M, Wong, EWM, Abramov, V, Zukerman, M. Bounds of the oerflow priority classification for blocking probability approximation in OBS networks. J Opt Commun Netw 2013;5:378–93. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.5.000378.10.1364/JOCN.5.000378Suche in Google Scholar

27. Bregni, S, Caruso, A, Pattavina, A. Buffering-deflection tradeoffs in optical burst switching. Photon Netw Commun 2010;20:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-010-0259-x.10.1007/s11107-010-0259-xSuche in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-01-17
Accepted: 2020-05-04
Published Online: 2020-07-06
Published in Print: 2024-01-29

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Amplifiers
  3. A Multistage High Performance Amplification Approach for Improving WDM Communication System
  4. Devices
  5. Design and performance analysis of all optical 4-bit parity generator and checker using dual-control dual SOA terahertz optical asymmetric demultiplexer (DCDS-TOAD)
  6. Micro-Ring Resonator-Based Sensors for Detection of Different Chemicals
  7. Quaternary Bit-Swap Logic with QPSK Signal Using Four Wave Mixing
  8. Fibers
  9. Comparative crosstalk performance analysis of different configurations of heterogeneous multicore fiber
  10. A Novel and Simple Formalism for Study of Effect of Kerr Nonlinearity on Petermann I and II Spot Sizes of Single-Mode-Graded Index Fiber
  11. Networks
  12. A controlled deflection routing and wavelength assignment based scheme in Optical Burst Switched (OBS) networks
  13. Experiment Study of Downstream Traffic Balancing Strategy on 40G Long Reach Coherent PON
  14. Reduction of Blocking Probability in Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switched Optical Networks
  15. Performance Evaluation of Bidirectional Wavelength Division Multiple Access Broadband Optical Passive Elastic Networks Operation Efficiency
  16. Systems
  17. Evaluation of Atmospheric Detrimental Effects on Free Space Optical Communication System for Delhi Weather
  18. Design and Performance Investigations with Ultra High Speed Optical ALU
  19. Enhancement of Signals Characteristics with Least Effect of Optical Communication Losses for Dense Optical Communication Systems
  20. Performance comparison of code division multiple access and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over turbulent effected free space optics link under the impact of advance coding formats
  21. Wavelength division multiplexing techniques based on multi transceiver in low earth orbit intersatellite systems
  22. Selection of suitable wavelengths for the dual-wavelength model of free space optics (FSO) systems for high-speed trains
  23. Effects of Laser Linewidth on the Performance of DP-QPSK DWDM System
Heruntergeladen am 6.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2019-0017/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen