Startseite The differential diversification of Mongolic
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The differential diversification of Mongolic

  • Juha Janhunen EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Oktober 2020

Abstract

This paper examines the Mongolic family of languages from the point of view of their different paths and rates of evolution, and with a view on the general problem concerning the speed of language change. All extant Mongolic languages descend from a relatively recent ancestral form of speech, Proto-Mongolic, spoken by the historical Mongols in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries and documented in a number of written sources conventionally known as Middle Mongol. A comparison of the modern Mongolic languages with Proto-Mongolic and Middle Mongol reveals considerable differences in their rates of evolution, with some languages being highly innovative, while others are conspicuously conservative. These differences are evident at all levels of linguistic structure and substance, including phonology, grammar, and lexicon. The reasons for the different rates of evolution can be sought in a variety of linguistic and extralinguistic factors, including not only the linguistic environment, but also the political and geographical context of the speakers, as well as their demographic structure, economic and cultural profile, and degree of mobility.


Corresponding author: Juha Janhunen, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, E-mail:

References

Balogh, Mátyás. 2017. Henan Mongol: A shrinking pool of unique linguistic features. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 245. 37–62.10.1515/ijsl-2017-0002Suche in Google Scholar

Barfield, Thomas J. 1989. The perilous frontier: Nomadic empires and China. Cambridge, M.A.: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Bregel, Yuri. 2003. An historical atlas of Central Asia. Handbuch der Orientalistik, vol. III.9. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047401216Suche in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612060Suche in Google Scholar

Golden, Peter B. 1992. An introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples: Ethnogenesis and state-formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East. Turcologica, vol. 9. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Suche in Google Scholar

Hvistendahl, Mara. 2012. Roots of empire. Science 337(6102). 1596–1599. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.337.6102.1596.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha. 1992. On the position of Khamnigan Mongol. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 84. 115–143.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha. 1996. Manchuria: An ethnic history. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, vol. 222. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha (ed.). 2003. The Mongolic languages. Routledge Language Family Series. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha. 2012. Khitan: Understanding the language behind the scripts. Scripta: International Journal of Writing Systems 4. 107–132.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha. 2019. Mixed languages and mixed genes in Northeast Asia. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 1(1). 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1163/25898833-12340013.Suche in Google Scholar

Jenkins, Gareth. 1974. A note on climatic cycles and the rise of Chinggis Khan. Central Asiatic Journal 18. 217–226.Suche in Google Scholar

Leiwo, Martti. 2020. Greek in Roman Egypt: The rate of language change and punctuated equilibrium model in the history of Greek language. In the present volume.Suche in Google Scholar

Loewe, Michael & Edward L Shaughnessy. 1999. The Cambridge history of Ancient China: From the origins of civilization to 221 B.C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521470308Suche in Google Scholar

Morgan, David. 2007 [1986]. The Mongols. The peoples of Europe, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Mostaert, Antoine & Albrecht de Smedt. 1929–1931. Le dialecte monguor parlé par les mongols du Kansou occidental. Ière partie: Phonétique. Anthropos 24. 145–166, 801–815 and 25. 657–669, 961–973 and 26. 253.Suche in Google Scholar

Mostaert, Antoine & Albrecht de Smedt. 1933. Le dialecte monguor parlé par les mongols du Kansou occidental. IIIème partie: Dictionnaire monguor-français. Pei-p’ing: Imprimerie de l’Université Catholique.Suche in Google Scholar

Mostaert, Antoine & Albrecht de Smedt. 1945. Le dialecte monguor parlé par les mongols du Kansou occidental. IIème partie: Grammaire. Monumenta Serica, Monograph 6. Peking: The Catholic University.Suche in Google Scholar

Munkuev, Nikolaj C. 1970. Zametki o drevnix mongolax [Notes on the ancient Mongols]. In Sergei Leonidovich Tixvinskii (ed.), Tataro-mongoly v Aziï i Evrope [The Tatar-Mongols in Asia and Europe], 352–381. Moskva: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Nugteren, Hans. 2011. Mongolic phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu languages. LOT Dissertation Series. Leiden.Suche in Google Scholar

Poppe, Nicholas. 1955. Introduction to Mongolian comparative studies. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 110. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Qinggeertai, Wu Yingzhe & Jiruhe. 2018. Qidan Xiaozi Zai Yanjiu [New Research on the Khitan Small Script], vols. 1–3. Huhehaote: Nei Menggu Daxue Chubanshe.Suche in Google Scholar

Rachewiltz, Igor de. 2004–2013. The secret history of the Mongols: A Mongolian epic chronicle of the thirteenth century, vols. 1–2, and 3 (Supplement). Brill’s Inner Asian Library. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047412410Suche in Google Scholar

Rossabi, Morris. 2012. The Mongols: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199840892.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Shimunek, Andrew. 2017. Languages of Ancient Southern Mongolia and Northern China. Tunguso-Sibirica, vol. 40. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.10.2307/j.ctvckq4f7Suche in Google Scholar

Slater, Keith. 2003. A grammar of Mangghuer: A Mongolic language of China’s Qinghai-Gansu Sprachbund. Curzon Asian Linguistics Series 2. London: Curzon.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793Suche in Google Scholar

Vovin, Alexander. 2018. An interpretation of the Khüis Tolgoi inscription. Journal Asiatique 306(2). 141–151.Suche in Google Scholar

Vovin, Alexander. 2019. A sketch of the earliest Mongolic language: the Brāhmī Bugut and Khüis Tolgoi inscriptions. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 1(1). 162–197. https://doi.org/10.1163/25898833-12340008.Suche in Google Scholar

Wittfogel, Karl A. & Fêng Chia-Sheng. 1949. History of Chinese society: Liao, vol. 36, 907–1125. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.10.2307/1005570Suche in Google Scholar

Wichmann, Søren & Eric W. Holman. 2009. Population size and rates of language change. Human Biology 81 (3). 259–274. https://doi.org/10.3378/027.081.0308.Suche in Google Scholar

Wontack, Hong. 2012. East Asia history: A tripolar approach. Revised edition. Seoul: Kudara International.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Yingzhe & Juha Janhunen. 2010. New materials on the Khitan small script: A critical edition of Xiao Dilu and Yelü Xiangwen. The Languages of Asia Series. Folkestone, Kent: Global Oriental.10.1163/9789004212824Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Dan & Hui Li (eds.). 2017. Languages and genes in Northwestern China and adjacent regions. Singapore: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-10-4169-3Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Charles. 2009. Population structure and language change. Unpublished manuscript./courses/cogs502/YangPopulation.pdf. (accessed 10 July 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-10-15

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 7.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsl-2019-0014/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen