Startseite Common Issues in Emergency Public Information as Identified in CSEPP Exercises
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Common Issues in Emergency Public Information as Identified in CSEPP Exercises

  • Ken Lerner EMAIL logo und Ken Bertram
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. Januar 2014

Abstract

The US Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program (CSEPP) has been holding multiple large hazmat exercises every year for over 20 years. A sample of CSEPP after-action reports were surveyed to extract issues relating to emergency public information. Analysis showed four themes among the identified issues, relating to accuracy of public warnings and news releases; coordination of information among jurisdictions; internal communications; and accuracy/completeness of information provided to individual callers. These issues and the solutions suggested by exercise evaluators are consistent with the current body of knowledge in crisis communications. While these themes emerged from study of particular traditional emergency public information techniques and situations, the lessons they give may be applied to a variety of emergency public information channels including social media.


Corresponding author: Ken Lerner, Argonne National Laboratory, Division of Decision and Information Sciences, Building 221 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439, USA, e-mail:

  1. 1

    Of the eight original storage sites in the continental U.S., destruction has been completed at six sites. Two sites remain active.

  2. 2

    CSEPP exercise standards and evaluation criteria are spelled out in joint Army-FEMA guidance. The latest version of the guidance was issued in December 2012: US Army Joint Program Executive Office, Chemical and Biological Defense and DHS/FEMA Technological Hazards Division, Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program Exercise Policy & Guidance, December 2012.

  3. 3

    Some of the exercise reports are marked “For Official Use Only” and are not available publicly. The public side of the CSEPP portal is located at www.cseppportal.net.

  4. 4

    Common issues identified included communications and power failures, hazardous material exposure, and unorganized evacuations, among others.

  5. 5

    In CSEPP the Army designates public information specialists as Public Affairs Officers (PAOs) while most state and local jurisdictions use the term Public Information Officer (PIO).

  6. 6

    The REPP is aimed at enhancing emergency preparedness for communities near nuclear power plants; see the DHS/FEMA website for further information (http://www.fema.gov/technological-hazards-division-0/radiological-emergency-preparedness-program).

  7. 7

    Further information and quick references on emergency public information may be found at: http://www.dis.anl.gov/groups/riskcomm/index.html.

Acknowledgments

This document was developed as part of the CSEPP History Project sponsored by the US Army Chemical Materials Activity. The activity partners with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure emergency preparedness in the communities surrounding the depots where stockpiled chemical weapons are stored. The Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program works closely with communities adjacent to the Nation’s remaining chemical weapons stockpiles. Its mission centers on enhancing emergency response plans and training, and identifying and securing response equipment and warning systems to meet each communities’ emergency preparedness needs. For further information about this document, please contact Ken Lerner, klerner@anl.gov.

The submitted manuscript has been created by UChicago Argonne, LLC, Operator of Argonne National Laboratory (“Argonne”). Argonne, a US Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory, is operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The US Government retains for itself, and others acting on its behalf, a paid-up nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in said article to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the Government.

References

Auf der Heide, Erik (1989) The Media: Friend and Foe. Disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination. St. Louis, Missouri: C.V. Mosby Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Blanchard, Wayne (1999) The Role of the Media in Emergency Management. September 17, 1999. Accessed on the FEMA Emergency Management Institute website at http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/docs/hazdem/Session%2020--Media.doc.Suche in Google Scholar

Bullock, Jane, George Haddow and Richard Bell (2004) “Communicating During Emergencies in the United States,” Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 19(2):3–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control (2002) Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, p. 75. http://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/.Suche in Google Scholar

Drabek, Thomas E. and Gerard J. Hoetmer, eds. (2000) Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government, Washington, DC: International City Management Association.Suche in Google Scholar

FEMA (2007) Basic Guidance for Public Information Officers, FEMA-517 (November 2007). Washington, DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/12578?id=3095.Suche in Google Scholar

FEMA (2013a) Hurricane Preparedness: Effects of Late Activations on Response Efforts, Sept. 26, 2013. Accessed on FEMA Lessons Learned Information Sharing system at https://www.llis.dhs.gov/content/hurricane-preparedness-effects-late-activations-response-efforts.Suche in Google Scholar

FEMA (2013b) CSEPP Cooperative Agreement Guidance, May 2013. Washington, DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/32092.Suche in Google Scholar

Fernandez, Louie and Martin Merzer (2003) Jane’s Crisis Communications Handbook. Alexandria, VA: Jane’s Information Group, pp. 80–81.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Henry W. III (1999) Hurricane Georges: The Experience of the Media and Emergency Management on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center, Quick Response Report #117.Suche in Google Scholar

Fraustino, J. D., Brooke Liu and Yan Jin (2012) Social Media Use during Disasters: A Review of the Knowledge Base and Gaps. MD: National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.Suche in Google Scholar

Gori, P. and W. Hays, eds. (1987) A Workshop on The U.S. Geological Survey’s Role in Hazards Warnings, Proceedings of Conference XL. Reston, VA: US Department of the Interior, Geological Survey.Suche in Google Scholar

Haddow, George D. and Kim S. Haddow (2009) Disaster Communications in a Changing Media World. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Larson, R. C., M. D. Metzger and M. F. Cahn (2006) “Responding to Emergencies: Lessons Learned and the Need for Analysis,” Interfaces, 36(6):486–501.10.1287/inte.1060.0250Suche in Google Scholar

Mileti, D. and J. Sorensen (1988) “Planning and Implementing Warning Systems.” In: (M. Lystad, ed.) Mental Health Care in Mass Emergencies: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel Psychological Stress Series, pp. 321–345.Suche in Google Scholar

Milsten, Andrew (2000) “Hospital Responses to Acute-Onset Disasters: A Review,” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 15(1):40–53. See also Rubin, Jeffrey N, “Recurring Pitfalls in Hospital Emergency Preparedness and Response.” In: (J. H. McIsaac III, ed.) Hospital Preparation for Bioterror: A Medical and Biomedical Systems Approach. Elsevier, Inc.10.1017/S1049023X00024900Suche in Google Scholar

Seeger, Matthew (2006) “Best Practices in Crisis Communication: An Expert Panel Process,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(3):232–244.10.1080/00909880600769944Suche in Google Scholar

Sutton, J., L. Palen and I. Shklovski (2007) “Backchannels on the Front Lines: Emergent Uses of Social Media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires.” In: (F. Fiedrich and B. Van de Walle, eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference. Washington, DC, USA, May 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

U.S. Army and Federal Emergency Management Agency (2012a) CSEPP Program Guidance, December 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

U.S. Army and Federal Emergency Management Agency (2012b). CSEPP Exercise Policy and Guidance, December 2012. The exercises covered in this study were evaluated using earlier versions of this guidance.Suche in Google Scholar

U.S. Senate (2006) Senate Rept. 109-322, Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared, U.S. Government Printing Office. (Finding 76 on p. 595.)Suche in Google Scholar

Vogt, Barbara M. and John H. Sorensen (1994) Risk Communications and the Chemical Stockpile Emergency-Preparedness Program, ORNL-6824 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory).10.2172/10186904Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-01-21

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 23.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsem-2013-0059/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen