Startseite Mathematik A note on Factoring groups into dense subsets
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

A note on Factoring groups into dense subsets

  • Igor Protasov EMAIL logo und Serhii Slobodianiuk
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Mai 2016

Abstract

Let G be a group of cardinality κ>0 endowed with a topology 𝒯 such that |U|=κ for every non-empty U𝒯 and 𝒯 has a base of cardinality κ. We prove that G can be factorized G=AB (i.e. each gG has a unique representation g=ab, aA, bB) into dense subsets A, B, |A|=|B|=κ. We do not know if this statement holds for κ=0 even if G is a topological group.

1 Introduction

For a cardinal κ, a topological space X is called κ-resolvable if X can be partitioned into κ dense subsets [1]. In the case κ=2, these spaces were defined by Hewitt [4] as resolvable spaces. If X is not κ-resolvable, then X is called κ-irresolvable.

In topological groups, the intensive study of resolvability was initiated by the following remarkable theorem of Comfort and van Mill [2]: every countable non-discrete Abelian topological group G with finite subgroup B(G) of elements of order 2 is 2-resolvable. In fact [11], every infinite Abelian group G with finite B(G) can be partitioned into ω subsets dense in every non-discrete group topology on G. On the other hand, under Martin’s Axiom, the countable Boolean group G, G=B(G) admits a maximal (hence, 2-irresolvable) group topology [5]. Every non-discrete ω-irresolvable topological group G contains an open countable Boolean subgroup provided that G is Abelian [6] or countable [10], but the existence of a non-discrete ω-irresolvable group topology on the countable Boolean group implies that there is a P-point in ω (see [6]). Thus, in some models of ZFC (see [8]), every non-discrete Abelian or countable topological group is ω-resolvable. For a systematic exposition of resolvability in topological and left topological groups see [3, Chapter 13].

Recently, a new kind resolvability of groups was introduced in [7]. A group G provided with a topology 𝒯 is called box κ-resolvable if there is a factorization G=AB such that |A|=κ and each subset aB is dense in 𝒯. If G is left topological (i.e. each left shift xgx, gG is continuous), then this is equivalent to B being dense in 𝒯. We recall that a product AB of subsets of a group G is a factorization if G=AB and the subsets {aB:aA} are pairwise disjoint (equivalently, each gG has a unique representation g=ab, aA, bB). For factorizations of groups into subsets see [9]. By [7, Theorem 1], if a topological group G contains an injective convergent sequence, then G is box ω-resolvable.

The aim of this note is to find some conditions under which an infinite group G of cardinality κ provided with a topology can be factorized into two dense subsets of cardinality κ. To this goal, we propose a new method of factorization based on filtrations of groups.

2 Theorem and question

We recall that the weight w(X) of a topological space X is the minimal cardinality of bases of the topology of X.

Theorem

Let G be an infinite group of cardinality κ, κ>0, endowed with a topology T such that w(G,T)κ and |U|=κ for each non-empty UT. Then there is a factorization G=AB into dense subsets A,B, |A|=|B|=κ.

We do not know whether or not this Theorem is true for κ=0 even if G is a topological group.

Question

Let G be a non-discrete countable Hausdorff topological group G of countable weight. Can G be factorized G=AB into two countable dense subsets?

In Section 4, we give a positive answer in the following cases: each finitely generated subgroup of G is nowhere dense, the set {x2:xU} is infinite for each non-empty open subset of G, G is Abelian.

3 Proof

We begin with some general constructions of factorizations of a group G via filtrations of G.

Let G be a group with the identity e. Let κ be a cardinal. A family {Gα:α<κ} of subgroups of G is called a filtration if

  1. G0={e}, G=α<κGα,

  2. GαGβ for all α<β,

  3. Gβ=α<βGα for every limit ordinal β.

Every ordinal α<κ has the unique representation α=γ(α)+n(α), where γ(α) is either a limit ordinal or 0 and n(α)ω, ω={0,1,}. We partition κ into two subsets

E(κ)={α<κ:n(α) is even}

and

O(κ)={α<κ:n(α) is odd}.

For each αE(κ), we choose some system Lα of representatives of left cosets of Gα+1Gα by Gα so Gα+1Gα=LαGα. For each αO(κ), we choose some system Rα of representatives of right cosets of Gα+1Gα by Gα so we have Gα+1Gα=GαRα.

We take an arbitrary element gG{e} and choose the smallest subgroup Gγ such that gGγ. By (3), γ=α(g)+1 so gGα(g)+1Gα(g). If α(g)E(κ), we choose x0(g)Lα(g) and g0Gα(g) such that g=x0(g)g0. If α(g)O(κ), we choose y0(g)Rα(g) and g0Gα(g) such that g=g0y0(g). If g0=e, we stop. Otherwise we repeat the argument for g0 and so on. Since the set of ordinals less than κ is well ordered, after a finite number of steps we get the representation

\text{(4)}g=x0(g)x1(g)xλ(g)(g)yρ(g)y1(g)y0(g),

where

xiLαi(g),α0(g)>α1(g)>>αλ(g)(g),yiRβi(g),β0(g)>β1(g)>>βρ(g)(g).

If either {α0(g),,αλ(g)(g)}= or {β0(g),,βρ(g)(g)}=, then we write g=yρ(g)y1(g)y0(g) or g=x0(g)x1(g)xλ(g)(g). Thus, G=AB where A is the set of all elements of the form x0(g)x1(g)xλ(g) and B is the set of all elements of the form yρ(g)y1(g)y0(g). To show that the product AB is a factorization of G, we assume that, besides (4), g has a representation

g=z0z1zλtρt1t0.

If gGα+1Gα and αO(κ), then z0z1zλtρt1Gα so t0=y0(g). If αE(κ), then z1zλtρt1t0Gα so z0=x0(g). We replace g by gt0-1 or by z0-1g respectively and repeat the same arguments.

Now we are ready to prove the Theorem. Let {Uα:α<κ} be a κ-sequence of non-empty open sets such that each non-empty U𝒯 contains some Uα. Since |Uα|=κ for every α<κ, we can construct inductively a filtration {Gα:α<κ}, |Gα|=max{0,|α|} such that for each αE(κ) (resp. αO(κ)) there is a system Lα (resp. Rα) of representatives of left (resp. right ) cosets of Gα+1Gα by Gα such that LαUγ (resp. RαUγ) for each γα. Then the subsets A,B of the above factorization of G are dense in 𝒯 because LαA, RβB for each αE(κ), βO(κ).

4 Comments

1. Analyzing the proof, we see that the Theorem holds under the weaker condition: G has a family of subsets such that ||=κ, |F|=κ for each F and, for every non-empty U𝒯, there is F such that FU.

If κ=0 but each finitely generating subgroup of G is nowhere dense, we can choose a family {Gn:nω} such that the corresponding A,B are dense. Thus, we get a positive answer to the Question if each finitely generated subgroup H of G is nowhere dense (equivalently the closure of H is not open).

2. Let G be a group and let A,B be subsets of G. We say that the product AB is a partial factorization if the subsets {aB:aA} are pairwise disjoint (equivalently, {Ab:bB} are pairwise disjoint).

We assume that AB is a partial factorization of G into finite subsets and that X is an infinite subset of G. Then the following statements are easily verified

  1. there is xX such that xB and A(B{x}) is a partial factorization;

  2. if the set {x2:xX} is infinite, then there is an element xX such that (A{x,x-1})B is a partial factorization.

3. Let G be a non-discrete Hausdorff topological group, let AB be a partial factorization of G into finite subsets, A=A-1, eAB and gAB. Then

  1. there is a neighbourhood V of e such that, for U=V{e} and for any xU, the product (A{x,x-1})(B{x-1g}) is a partial factorization (so g(A{x,x-1})(B{x-1g})).

It suffices to choose V so that V=V-1 and

AUgAB=,UB(ABAUg)=,U2gAB=,UA=.

We use A=A-1 only in UBAUg=.

4. Let G be countable non-discrete Hausdorff topological group such that the set {x2:xU} is infinite for every non-empty open subset U of G. We enumerate G={gn:nω}, g0=e and choose a countable base {Un:nω} for non-empty open sets. We put A0={e}, B0={e} and use (5), (6), (7) to choose inductively two sequences (An)nω and (Bn)nω of finite subsets of G such that for every nω, AnAn+1, BnBn+1, An=An-1, AnBn is a partial factorization, gnAnBn, AnUn, BnUn. We put

A=nωAn,B=nωBn

and note that AB is a factorization of G into dense subsets.

5. Let G be a countable Abelian non-discrete Hausdorff topological group of countable weight. We suppose that G contains a non-discrete finitely generated subgroup H. Given any non-empty open subset U of G, we choose a neighborhood X of e in H and gS such that XgU. Since H is finitely generated, the set {x2:xX} is infinite so we can apply comment 4. If each finitely generated subgroup of G is discrete then, to answer the Question, we use comment 1.

6. Let G be a countable group endowed with a topology 𝒯 of countable weight such that U is infinite for every U𝒯. Applying the inductive construction from comment 5 to AnBn and Bn+1-1An-1, we get a partial factorization of G into two dense subsets.

7. Let G be a group satisfying the assumption of the Theorem and let γ be an infinite cardinal, γ<κ. We take a subgroup A of cardinality γ and choose inductively a dense set B of representatives of right cosets of G by A. Then we get a factorization G=AB. In particular, if G is left topological, then G is box γ-resolvable.


Communicated by George Willis


References

[1] Ceder J., On maximally resolvable spaces, Fund. Math. 55 (1964), 87–93. 10.4064/fm-55-1-87-93Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Comfort W. and van Mill J., Group with only resolvable group topologies, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1993), 687–696. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1994-1209097-XSuche in Google Scholar

[3] Filali M. and Protasov I., Ultrafilters and Topologies on Groups, Math. Stud. Monogr. Ser. 13, VNTL, Lviv, 2010. Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Hewitt E., A problem of set-theoretic topology, Duke Math. J. 10 (1943), 309–333. 10.1215/S0012-7094-43-01029-4Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Malykhin V., Extremally disconnected and similar groups, Soviet Math. Dokl. 16 (1975), 21–25. . Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Protasov I., Irresolvable topologies on groups, Ukr. Math. J. 50 (1998), 1879–1887. 10.1007/BF02514204Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Protasov I., Box resolvability, preprint 2015, http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.01046; to appear in Topology Appl. 10.1016/j.topol.2016.06.016Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Shelah S., Proper Forcing, Lecture Notes in Math. 940, Springer, Berlin, 1982. 10.1007/978-3-662-21543-2Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Szabó S. and Sands A., Factoring Groups into Subsets, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009. 10.1201/9781420090475Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Zelenyuk E., On partitions of groups into dense subsets, Topology Appl. 126 (2002), 327–339. 10.1016/S0166-8641(02)00093-7Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Zelenyuk E., Partitions and sums with inverse in Abelian groups, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 115 (2008), 331–339. 10.1016/j.jcta.2007.05.002Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-2-14
Revised: 2016-4-29
Published Online: 2016-5-18
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

© 2017 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 7.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2016-0021/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen