High tone bumping in Runyankore
-
Larry M. Hyman
Abstract
In this study I present the unusual properties of a rule of High Tone Bumping (HTB) which occurs in certain languages of the Rutara subgroup of Bantu. By this process, the final H tone of a word or clitic “bumps” a preceding H tone one syllable to the left, e.g. /kaawá=kí/ → kááwa=kí ‘what coffee?’ (as realized utterance-medially). The triggers consist of /H/ CV monosyllables as well as VCV words whose final syllable is /H/. Since these can interact with each other, frequently with V+V vowel coalescence, this produces H tone sequences of trigger-targets in which each H appears to be bumped one syllable to the left. I present the facts of HTB in some detail and offer two synchronic analyses, one involving a left-to-right iterative rule, the other recognizing H*-marked tone spans that can be globally accessed to apply HTB all at once. I conclude by considering possible historical origins of HTB.
Acknowledgements
This paper is based on materials collected with my primary consultant, Dr. Daphine Namara, a native speaker of the pastoralist group from Kamushoko Parish in Mbarara District of Uganda, originally in an undergraduate field methods course at UC Berkeley in Fall 2019 and probed further by the author over the following six months. I would especially like to thank Daphine (DN) for her dedication to this project, two other consultants, Gloria Tumushabe and James Arinaitwe, and the members of the field methods course, especially Nicholas Carrick, who wrote a short paper on the original HTB observation, applying optimality theory (Carrick 2019). I am also grateful to Will Leben for a very helpful Zoom discussion (5/28/20) and to Laura Downing, and to two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
References
Bickmore, Lee Stephen. 1989. Kinyambo prosody. Los Angeles: University of Calffornia Doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Byarushengo, Ernest Rugwa, Larry M. Hyman & Sarah Tenenbaum. 1976. Tone, accent, and assertion in Haya. In Larry M. Hyman (ed.), Studies in Bantu tonology [Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3], 185–205. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Suche in Google Scholar
Carrick, Nicholas. 2019. High tone anticipation in Runyankore. Berkeley: Ms. University of California.Suche in Google Scholar
Cassimjee, Farida & Charles W. Kisseberth. 1998. In Larry M. Hyman & Charles W Kisseberth (eds.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone, 33–132. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Coupez, André. 1954. Etudes sur la langue Luba. Tervuren: Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge.Suche in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. 1996. The tonal phonology of Jita. München-Newcastle: LINCOM EUROPA.Suche in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. 2004. What African languages tell us about accent typology. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 37. 101–136. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.37.2004.247.Suche in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. & Al Mtenje. 2018. The phonology of Chichewa. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198724742.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1984. Meeussen’s rule. In Mark Aronoff & Richard Oehrle (eds.), Language sound structure, 245–295. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hubbard, Kathleen. 1992. NP-VP asymmetries in Runyambo prosodic domains. Berkeley: Ms. University of California.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1989. Accent in Bantu: An appraisal. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19. 115–134.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2007. Universals of tone rules: 30 years later. In Tomas Riad & Carlos Gussenhoven (eds.), Tones and tunes: Studies in word and sentence prosody, 1–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207569.1.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2018. The autosegmental approach to tone in Lusoga. In Diane Brentari & Lee Jackson (eds.), Shaping phonology, 47–69. University of Chicago Press.10.5070/P7121040726Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2021. Augmentability and high tone deletion in Runyankore. Africana Linguistica 27. 103–140.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2022. Prosodic asymmetries in nominal vs. verbal phrases in Bantu. In Haruo Kubozono, Junko Ito & Armin Mester (eds.), Prosody and prosodic interfaces, 125–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198869740.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Ernest Rugwa Byarushengo. 1984. A model of Haya tonology. In G.N. Clements & John Goldsmith (eds.), Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone, 53–103. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110864465.53Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Francis X. Katamba. 1990. Final vowel shortening in Luganda. Studies in African Linguistics 21. 1–59. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v21i1.107438.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Francis X. Katamba. 2010. Tone, syntax, and prosodic domains in Luganda. In Laura J. Downing, et al. (eds.). ZAS Papers in Linguistics 53. 69–98.https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.53.2010.393.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Joyce T. Mathangwane. 1998. Tonal domains and depressor consonants in Ikalanga. In Larry M. Hyman & Charles W. Kisseberth (eds.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone, 195–229. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Al Mtenje. 1999. Prosodic morphology and tone: The case of Chichewa. In René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody-morphyology interface, 90–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511627729.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Armindo Ngunga. 1994. On the non-universality of tonal association ‘conventions’ evidence from Ciyao. Phonology 11. 25–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001834.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Lawrence. 1976. Devoicing, tone, and stress in Runyankore. In Larry M. Hyman (ed.), Studies in Bantu tonology [Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3], 208-216. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaji, Shigeki. 2004. A Ruyankore vocabulary. Tokyo: ILCAA.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaji, Shigeki. 2010. A comparative study of tone of West Ugandan Bnatu languages, with particular focus on the tone loss in Tooro. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 53. 99–107. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.53.2010.394.Suche in Google Scholar
Kanerva, Jonni. 1990. Focus and phrasing in Chichewa phonology. Stanford University Doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Charles Kisseberth. 1977. Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1976. Tone anticipation in Kinyarwanda. In Larry M. Hyman (ed.), Studies in Bantu tonology [Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3], 169–181. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Suche in Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles W. & Emmanuel Ndabasara. 1993. The nominal tonology of Ruciga. Champaign-Urbana: Ms. University of Illinois.Suche in Google Scholar
Maho, Jouni. 20092009. NUGL online, the online version of the new updated Guthrie list, a referential classification of the Bantu languages. Version of June 4. https://brill.com/fileasset/downloads_products/35125_Bantu-New-updated-Guthrie-List.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Moto, Francis. 1989. Phonology of the Bantu lexicon. University College London Doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Myers, Scott & Troi Carlton. 1996. Tonal transfer in Chichewa. Phonology 13. 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095267570000018x.Suche in Google Scholar
Nash, Jay A. 1992–94. Underlying low tones in Ruwund. Studies in African Linguistics 23. 223–278.10.32473/sal.v23i3.107413Suche in Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1998. Principles of tone assignment in Tanzanian Yao. In Larry M. Hyman & Charles W. Kisseberth (eds.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone, 265–314. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Odden, David. 2000. The phrasal tonology of Zinza. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 21. 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall.2000.21.1.45.Suche in Google Scholar
Philippson, Gérard. 1991. Ton et accent dans les langues bantu d’Afrique Orientale: Étude comparative typologique et diachronique. Paris: Université René Descartes Doctorat d’Etat.Suche in Google Scholar
Poletto, Robert E. 1998. Topics in Runyankore phonology. Ohio State University Doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1985. Nkore-Kiga. London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar
van der Wal, Jenneke & Allen Asiimwe. 2020. The tonal residue of the conjoint/disjoint alternation in Rukiga. Studies in African Linguistics 20. 43–59. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v49i1.122261.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Editorial
- Articles
- Morphological Khoisan influence in the Southern African Bantu language Yeyi
- High tone bumping in Runyankore
- Landuma: a case of radical alliterative agreement
- Extending !Xun dialect comparisons with a Ju|’hoan variety spoken in |Xae|xae, Botswana: gender classes, plural markers and loanwords
- Book Review
- Maren Rüsch. 2020. A conversational analysis of Acholi: structure and socio-pragmatics of a Nilotic language of Uganda. Leiden: Brill Academic, 376pp. ISBN 978-90-04-43758-6, $174.00
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Editorial
- Articles
- Morphological Khoisan influence in the Southern African Bantu language Yeyi
- High tone bumping in Runyankore
- Landuma: a case of radical alliterative agreement
- Extending !Xun dialect comparisons with a Ju|’hoan variety spoken in |Xae|xae, Botswana: gender classes, plural markers and loanwords
- Book Review
- Maren Rüsch. 2020. A conversational analysis of Acholi: structure and socio-pragmatics of a Nilotic language of Uganda. Leiden: Brill Academic, 376pp. ISBN 978-90-04-43758-6, $174.00
