Psychological needs, self-regulation, and motivation profiles among a sample of Hong Kong Chinese university students: a person-centered approach

References

1. American College Health Association. Healthy campus 2010: make it happen 2002. URL: https://www.acha.org/healthycampus.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Melton BF, Bigham LE, Bland HW, Bird M, Fairman C. Health-related behaviors and technology usage among college students. Am J Health Behav 2014;38:510–8.10.5993/AJHB.38.4.4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7Suche in Google Scholar

5. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 2000;11:227–68.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01Suche in Google Scholar

6. Edmunds J, Ntoumanis N, Duda JL. A test of self-determination theory in the exercise domain. J Appl Soc Psychol 2006;36: 2240–65.10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00102.xSuche in Google Scholar

7. Hagger M, Chatzisarantis N. Self-determination theory and the psychology of exercise. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2008;1: 79–103.10.1080/17509840701827437Suche in Google Scholar

8. Mullan E, Markland D, Ingledew DK. A graded conceptualisation of self-determination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: development of a measure using confirmatory factor analytic procedures. Pers Individ Dif 1997;23:745–52.10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00107-4Suche in Google Scholar

9. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Koestner R, Losier GG. Distinguishing three ways of being internally motivated: a closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002:101–21.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Owen KB, Astell-Burt T, Lonsdale C. The relationship between self-determined motivation and physical activity in adolescent boys. J Adolesc Health 2013;53:420–2.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.05.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Sabiston CM, Brunet J, Kowalski KC, Wilson PM, Mack DE, Crocker PR. The role of body-related self-conscious emotions in motivating women’s physical activity. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2010;32:417–37.10.1123/jsep.32.4.417Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Barbeau A, Sweet SN, Fortier M. A path-analytic model of self-determination theory in a physical activity context. J Appl Biobehav Res 2009;14:103–18.10.1111/j.1751-9861.2009.00043.xSuche in Google Scholar

14. Standage M, Sebire S, Loney T. Engagement in objectively assessed bouts of moderate-intensity exercise: a self-determination theory perspective. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2008;30:337–52.10.1123/jsep.30.4.337Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9:78–108.10.1186/1479-5868-9-78Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Duda JL, Allison MT. Cross-cultural analysis in exercise and sport psychology: a void in the field. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1990;12:114–31.10.1123/jsep.12.2.114Suche in Google Scholar

17. Duda J, Hayashi C, Duda J. Measurement issues in cross-cultural research within sport and exercise psychology. Adv Sport Exerc Psychol Meas 1998;7:471–83.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Lonsdale C, Sabiston CM, Taylor IM, Ntoumanis N. Measuring student motivation for physical education: examining the psychometric properties of the perceived locus of causality questionnaire and the situational motivation scale. Psychol Sport Exerc 2011;12:284–92.10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.003Suche in Google Scholar

19. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull 1999;125:627–68.10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;76:349–66.10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.349Suche in Google Scholar

21. Martin SB, Morrow JR, Jackson AW, Dunn AL. Variables related to meeting the CDC/ACSM physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:2087–92.10.1097/00005768-200012000-00019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Lee RL, Loke AJ. Health-promoting behaviors and psychosocial well-being of university students in hong kong. Public Health Nurs 2005;22:209–20.10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220304.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Mok WK, Lee AY. A case study on application of the theory of planned behaviour: predicting physical activity of adolescents in hong kong. J Commun Med Health Educ 2013;3:231–7.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Vallerand RJ, Fortier MS, Guay F. Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997;72:1161–76.10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161Suche in Google Scholar

25. Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. Students’ motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: a self-determination theory approach. Res Q Exerc Sport 2006;77:100–10.10.1080/02701367.2006.10599336Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Wang C, Biddle S. Young people’s motivational profiles in physical activity: a cluster analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2001;23:1–22.10.1123/jsep.23.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

27. Moran CM, Diefendorff JM, Kim T-Y, Liu Z-Q. A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. J Vocat Behav 2012;81:354–63.10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

28. Ullrich-French S, Cox A. Using cluster analysis to examine the combinations of motivation regulations of physical education students. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2009;31:358–79.10.1123/jsep.31.3.358Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Lim BS, Wang CK. Perceived autonomy support, behavioural regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychol Sport Exerc 2009;10:52–60.10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.003Suche in Google Scholar

30. Wang C, Chatzisarantis NL, Spray CM, Biddle SJ. Achievement goal profiles in school physical education: differences in self-determination, sport ability beliefs, and physical activity. Br J Educ Psychol 2002;72:433–45.10.1348/000709902320634401Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Marsh H, Lüdtke O, Trautwein U, Morin AS. Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Struct Equ Modeling 2009;16:191–225.10.1080/10705510902751010Suche in Google Scholar

32. Ratelle CF, Guay F, Vallerand RJ, Larose S, Senécal C. Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: a person-oriented analysis. J Educ Psychol 2007;99:734–46.10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734Suche in Google Scholar

33. Boiché J, Sarrazin PG, Grouzet FM, Pelletier LG, Chanal JP. Students’ motivational profiles and achievement outcomes in physical education: a self-determination perspective. J Educ Psychol 2008;100:688.10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.688Suche in Google Scholar

34. Cox AE, Ullrich-French S, Sabiston CM. Using motivation regulations in a person-centered approach to examine the link between social physique anxiety in physical education and physical activity-related outcomes in adolescents. Psychol Sport Exerc 2013;14:461–7.10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.005Suche in Google Scholar

35. Ntoumanis N. Motivational clusters in a sample of british physical education classes. Psychol Sport Exerc 2002;3:177–94.10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00020-6Suche in Google Scholar

36. McNeill MC, Wang CK. Psychological profiles of elite school sports players in Singapore. Psychol Sport Exerc 2005;6:117–28.10.1016/j.psychsport.2003.10.004Suche in Google Scholar

37. Markland D, Tobin V. A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2004;26:191–6.10.1123/jsep.26.2.191Suche in Google Scholar

38. Wilson PM, Rodgers WM. The relationship between perceived autonomy support, exercise regulations and behavioral intentions in women. Psychol Sport Exerc 2004;5:229–42.10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00003-7Suche in Google Scholar

39. Ingledew DK, Markland D. Three levels of exercise motivation. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 2009;1:336–55.10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01015.xSuche in Google Scholar

40. Vlachopoulos SP, Kaperoni M, Moustaka FC. The relationship of self-determination theory variables to exercise identity. Psychol Sport Exerc 2011;12:265–72.10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.006Suche in Google Scholar

41. Markland D, Tobin VJ. Need support and behavioural regulations for exercise among exercise referral scheme clients: the mediating role of psychological need satisfaction. Psychol Sport Exerc 2010;11:91–9.10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.07.001Suche in Google Scholar

42. Wilson PM, Rogers WT, Rodgers WM, Wild TC. The psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2006;28:231–51.10.1123/jsep.28.3.231Suche in Google Scholar

43. Gunnell KE, Wilson PM, Zumbo BD, Mack DE, Crocker PR. Assessing psychological need satisfaction in exercise contexts: Issues of score invariance, item modification, and context. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2012;16:219–36.10.1080/1091367X.2012.693340Suche in Google Scholar

44. Gunnell KE, Crocker PR, Mack DE, Wilson PM, Zumbo BD. Goal contents, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, well-being and physical activity: a test of self-determination theory over 6 months. Psychol Sport Exerc 2014;15:19–29.10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.08.005Suche in Google Scholar

45. Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instruments. In: Lonner W, Berrhy J, editors. Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986:137–64.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Collins LM, Lanza ST. Latent class and latent transition analysis : with applications in the social behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling 2007;14:535–69.10.1080/10705510701575396Suche in Google Scholar

48. Wang J, Wang X. Mixture modeling. In: Balding DJ, editor. Structural equation modeling: applications using mplus. New York: Wiley, 2012:289–390.10.1002/9781118356258.ch6Suche in Google Scholar

49. Aldridge AA, Roesch SC. Developing coping typologies of minority adolescents: A latent profile analysis. J Adolescence 2008;31:499–517.10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.08.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Enders CK. A note on the use of missing auxiliary variables in full information maximum likelihood-based structural equation models. Struct Equ Modeling 2008;15:434–48.10.1080/10705510802154307Suche in Google Scholar

51. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1996;1:16–29.10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16Suche in Google Scholar

53. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6:1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118Suche in Google Scholar

54. Kline P. An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge, 1994.Suche in Google Scholar

55. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993:136–62.Suche in Google Scholar

56. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS : basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

57. Shen B, Wingert RK, Li W, Sun H, Rukavina PB. An amotivation model in physical education. J Teach Phys Educ 2010;29: 72–84.10.1123/jtpe.29.1.72Suche in Google Scholar

58. Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. J Educ Psychol 2003;95:97–110.10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97Suche in Google Scholar

59. Taylor IM, Ntoumanis N, Standage M, Spray CM. Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: a multilevel linear growth analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2010;32:99–120.10.1123/jsep.32.1.99Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Gillison FB, Standage M, Skevington SM. Motivation and body-related factors as discriminators of change in adolescents’ exercise behavior profiles. J Adolesc Health 2011;48:44–51.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.05.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Smith JL, Deemer ED, Thoman DB, Zazworsky L. Motivation under the microscope: Understanding undergraduate science students’ multiple motivations for research. Motiv Emot 2014;38:496–512.10.1007/s11031-013-9388-8Suche in Google Scholar

62. Hayenga A, Corpus J. Profiles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: A person-centered approach to motivation and achievement in middle school. Motiv Emot 2010;34:371–83.10.1007/s11031-010-9181-xSuche in Google Scholar

63. Markus HR, Kitayama S. Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In: Murphy-Berman V, Berman J, editors. Nebraska symposium on motivation: cross-cultural differences in perspectives on self. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2003:1–57.Suche in Google Scholar