Abstract
In this article, I seek to defend three main claims: Firstly, that the kinds of practices that are the object of study of constitutional theorists are undergirded by certain fundamental shared understandings. Secondly, that these shared understandings together form a rich fabric of meaning that is, broadly speaking, held in common across modern western societies, which I call the ‘constitutional imaginary’. Thirdly, that political institutions play a symbolic role as ‘repositories’ of shared understandings, which is crucial for the development, maintenance, propagation and evolution of the constitutional imaginary. On the basis of these claims, I propose a distinctive role for constitutional theory: the interpretation of the social meaning of political institutions and the actions and events that take place in and around them.
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Legitimate and Illegitimate Political Self-entrenchment and Its Impact on Political Equality
- The Constitutional Imaginary: Shared Meanings in Constitutional Practice and Implications for Constitutional Theory
- Notes and Essays
- Writing While Quarantined: A Personal Interpretation of Contemporary Comparative Constitutional Law
- Self-Determination Through Autonomy or Independence? – On the Current and Future Position of New Caledonia
- Names beyond Gender-Based Borders
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Legitimate and Illegitimate Political Self-entrenchment and Its Impact on Political Equality
- The Constitutional Imaginary: Shared Meanings in Constitutional Practice and Implications for Constitutional Theory
- Notes and Essays
- Writing While Quarantined: A Personal Interpretation of Contemporary Comparative Constitutional Law
- Self-Determination Through Autonomy or Independence? – On the Current and Future Position of New Caledonia
- Names beyond Gender-Based Borders