Abstract
Today, the Austrian Constitutional Court looks back on an eventful history. The Austrian model of constitutional adjudication attracted wide attention, in particular after World War II and proved to be a success story. Carefully managing both the influences of the ECHR and, most recently, those of European Union law, the Court has become an active player in the dialogue of the courts involved.
Keywords: Constitutional Court; constitutional adjudication; Austrian model; judicial review; Rule of Law
This manuscript is based on a lecture held by President Holzinger at the Constitution Day on 2 October 2017. The lecture form largely was retained.
Published Online: 2018-4-14
Published in Print: 2018-4-25
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Constitutional Jurisdiction in a Democracy Governed by the Rule of Law
- Interdependency between Sovereignty, Citizenship and the Right to Vote
- European Consensus: A Conservative and a Dynamic Force in European Human Rights Jurisprudence
- A Re-examination of the Family Reunification Directive in the post-Lisbon Fundamental Rights Scene
- Expropriation of Adolf Hitler’s Birthplace: Justified under the Special Historic Responsibility of Austria
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
Constitutional Court;
constitutional adjudication;
Austrian model;
judicial review;
Rule of Law
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Constitutional Jurisdiction in a Democracy Governed by the Rule of Law
- Interdependency between Sovereignty, Citizenship and the Right to Vote
- European Consensus: A Conservative and a Dynamic Force in European Human Rights Jurisprudence
- A Re-examination of the Family Reunification Directive in the post-Lisbon Fundamental Rights Scene
- Expropriation of Adolf Hitler’s Birthplace: Justified under the Special Historic Responsibility of Austria