Comparing Constitutional Adjudication
-
Mirha Karahodžić
Legal Advisor at the Austrian Constitutional Court and was a participant of CoCoA Summer School 2014.
Abstract
CoCoA Summer School, which has been initially run for four seasons (2006- 2009) by the Faculty of Law of the University of Trento under the European Marie Curie Programme, has been offered again in 2014 furthering the previous profitable experiences and keeping the same main features and purposes like providing an opportunity for senior (guest speakers) and junior scholars (tutors), legal advisors to Constitutional Court judges as well as younger researchers, post-doc students and PhD candidates (participants) to meet, interact, train and being trained and plan future research in comparative constitutional adjudication. The Summer School aims at comparing judicial decisions from national and European (ECtHR, ECJ) jurisdictions on selected constitutional issues. This year the topic was ‘Constitutional Adjudication in Education Law: A Comparative Approach within the Council of Europe’.
About the author
Legal Advisor at the Austrian Constitutional Court and was a participant of CoCoA Summer School 2014.
© 2017 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Inhalt
- Table of Contents
- Articles
- Adam Smith’s Lectures on Jurisprudence – Justice, Law, and the Moral Economy
- Undermining Trial by Jury in Russia in Counterterrorism and the Wider Criminal Law
- Notes
- Contemporary United States Law Regarding Online Social Media Libel Standards on the 50th Year Anniversary of Times v Sullivan and 40th Year Anniversary of Gertz v Welch
- Comparing Constitutional Adjudication
- Developments Austria
- Strengthening the Judicial Review System in Austria
- Data Retention: A Violation of the Right to Data Protection
- Data Retention: Directive invalid – Limits imposed by the Principle of Proportionality exceeded
- Data Retention: As to the Admissibility of the Applications − A Reversal of Trend in the Jurisdiction?
- Developments CEE
- Slovak Constitutional Court: Tax and Delegated Legislation from a Constitutional Perspective
- Book Reviews
- Armin von Bogdandy and Ingo Venzke, In wessen Namen? Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens (In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication), Suhrkamp, 2014, ISBN 9783518296882 (paperback), 383 pp
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Inhalt
- Table of Contents
- Articles
- Adam Smith’s Lectures on Jurisprudence – Justice, Law, and the Moral Economy
- Undermining Trial by Jury in Russia in Counterterrorism and the Wider Criminal Law
- Notes
- Contemporary United States Law Regarding Online Social Media Libel Standards on the 50th Year Anniversary of Times v Sullivan and 40th Year Anniversary of Gertz v Welch
- Comparing Constitutional Adjudication
- Developments Austria
- Strengthening the Judicial Review System in Austria
- Data Retention: A Violation of the Right to Data Protection
- Data Retention: Directive invalid – Limits imposed by the Principle of Proportionality exceeded
- Data Retention: As to the Admissibility of the Applications − A Reversal of Trend in the Jurisdiction?
- Developments CEE
- Slovak Constitutional Court: Tax and Delegated Legislation from a Constitutional Perspective
- Book Reviews
- Armin von Bogdandy and Ingo Venzke, In wessen Namen? Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens (In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication), Suhrkamp, 2014, ISBN 9783518296882 (paperback), 383 pp
