Startseite Literaturwissenschaften Doubly hidden, doubly exposed: master-narratives, counter-narratives, and the ethics of “passing” in The Human Stain
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Doubly hidden, doubly exposed: master-narratives, counter-narratives, and the ethics of “passing” in The Human Stain

  • Howard Sklar EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Juni 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Philip Roth’s 2000 novel The Human Stain wades directly into the ethical and emotional complexities of “passing,” the attempt by light-skinned African Americans, particularly during the Jim Crow era of American history, to hide their identities in order to assimilate within mainstream White society. The novel presents the case of Professor Coleman Silk, a Black man passing as White, a hidden identity that is compounded by the particular “White” identity that Silk has adopted: Jewish. Roth has reduced the distance between his own (Jewish) experience and that of a passing African American by providing Silk with an adopted Jewish identity. Thus, Roth engages – in possibly irreconcilable ways – with two master-narratives. On the one hand, he counters a master-narrative of White supremacy by revealing the debilitating experience of hiddenness – both Black and, by implication, Jewish – as represented in one man. However, the novel also reinforces – without any implication of counter-narration – another master-narrative that presents “identity politics” primarily as a narrowminded attempt to police social discourse. These contradictory impulses ultimately muddle the rhetorical persuasiveness of a novel that both challenges one form of discriminatory discourse, while reinforcing another. While the fictional mode itself enables Roth to attempt to inhabit Coleman’s complex experience, the novel ultimately misses an opportunity to effectively challenge, through counter-narration, the ethical dimensions of that story.


Corresponding author: Howard Sklar, Department of Languages (English Philology), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, E-mail:

References

Bamberg, Michael & Zachary Wipff. 2021. Reconsidering counter-narratives. In Klarissa Lueg & Marianne Wolff Lundholdt (eds.), Routledge handbook of counter-narratives, 70–82. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429279713-7Suche in Google Scholar

Biale, David. 2009. Blood and the discourses of Nazi antisemitism. In Murray Baumgarten, Peter Kenez & Bruce Thompson (eds.), Varieties of antisemitism: History, ideology, discourse, 29–49. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. 1994. Mauschel and monotheism; or, the Jew as off-white male. Unpublished manuscript, used by permission of the author.Suche in Google Scholar

Brodkin, Karen. 1998. How Jews became white folks & what that says about race in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Caracciolo, Marco. 2014. The experientiality of narrative: An enactivist approach. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110365658Suche in Google Scholar

Clifton, Jonathan & Dorien Van De Mieroop. 2016. Master narratives, identities, and the stories of former slaves. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.22Suche in Google Scholar

Du Bois, William E. B. 2007 [1903]. The souls of Black folk. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Elliott, Richard. 2020. “The fantasy of purity is appalling”: (De)constructing identity in The Human Stain. Philip Roth Studies 16(1). 92–110. https://doi.org/10.5703/philrothstud.16.1.0092.Suche in Google Scholar

Fabi, M. Giulia. 2001. Passing and the rise of the African American novel. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Franco, Dean J. 2004. Being Black, being Jewish, and knowing the difference: Philip Roth’s “The Human Stain”; or, it depends on what the meaning of “Clinton” is. Studies in American Jewish Literature 23. 88–103.Suche in Google Scholar

Gates, Henry LouisJr. (ed.). 1990. Three classic African-American novels. New York: Vintage.Suche in Google Scholar

Gilman, Sander. 1986. Jewish self-hatred: Anti-semitism and the hidden language of the Jews. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.2307/1454471Suche in Google Scholar

Gilman, Sander L. 1991. The Jew’s body. New York & London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Glaser, Jennifer. 2008. The Jew in the canon: Reading race and literary history in Philip Roth’s The Human Stain. PMLA 123(5). 1465–1478. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2008.123.5.1465.Suche in Google Scholar

Hakemulder, Jèmeljan. 2000. The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept (Utrecht Publications in General and Comparative Literature 34). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/upal.34Suche in Google Scholar

Henderson, Mae G. 2002. Critical foreword. In Nella Larsen (ed.), Passing, xvii–lxxxv. New York: The Modern Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, David. 2009. Basic elements of narrative. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444305920Suche in Google Scholar

Hyvärinen, Matti. 2021. Toward a theory of counter-narratives: Narrative contestation, cultural canonicity, and tellability. In Klarissa Lueg & Marianne Wolff Lundholdt (eds.), Routledge handbook of counter-narratives, 17–29. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429279713-3Suche in Google Scholar

Keen, Suzanne. 2007. Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kunzru, Hari, Kamila Shamsie, Aminatta Forna, Chris Cleave, A. L. Kennedy, Stella Duffy, Linda Grant, Naomi Alderman, Philip Hensher, Maggie Gee & Nikesh Shukla. 2016. Whose life is it anyway? Novelists have their say on cultural appropriation. The Guardian, 1 October. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/oct/01/novelists-cultural-appropriation-literature-lionel-shriver? (accessed 3 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen, Nella. 2002 [1929]. Passing. New York: The Modern Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Memmi, Albert. 1971 [1962]. Portrait of a Jew. Trans. Elisabeth Abbott. New York: Viking Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Meretoja, Hanna. 2021. A dialogics of counter-narratives. In Klarissa Lueg & Marianne Wolff Lundholdt (eds.), Routledge handbook of counter-narratives, 30–42. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429279713-4Suche in Google Scholar

Nielsen, Henrik Skov, James Phelan & Richard Walsh. 2015. Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative 23(1). 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0005.Suche in Google Scholar

Parrish, Timothy. 2007. Roth and ethnic identity. In Timothy Parrish (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Philip Roth, 127–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.proquest.com/books/roth-ethnic-identity/docview/2137993408/se-2?accountid=11365 (accessed 19 February 2025).10.1017/CCOL0521864305.010Suche in Google Scholar

Patron, Sylvie. 2024. Master and counter-narratives in fiction: A case study from Ahmadou Kourouma’s The Suns of Independence. Paper presented at the International Society for the Study of Narrative annual conference, University of Newcastle, UK, 17–19 April.Suche in Google Scholar

Phelan, James. 2007. Experiencing fiction: Judgments, progressions, and the rhetorical theory of narrative. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Reznick, Ohad. 2024. Imagined non-Jews: Jews passing as gentiles in post-WWII and multicultural American fiction. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.10.1163/9789004704336Suche in Google Scholar

Roth, Philip. 1986. The counterlife. London: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Roth, Philip. 2001 [2000]. The human stain. London & New York: Vintage.Suche in Google Scholar

Sklar, Howard. 2013. The art of sympathy in fiction: Forms of ethical and emotional persuasion (Linguistic Approaches to Literature 15). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.15Suche in Google Scholar

Sklar, Howard. 2017. Introduction: On the importance of ethics in imagining fictional worlds. In Merja Polvinen, Maria Salenius & Howard Sklar (eds.), Mielikuvituksen maailmat: Tieteidenvälisiä tutkimuksia kirjallisuudesta/Fantasins världar: Tvärvetenskaplig litteraturforskning [Worlds of imagination: Explorations in interdisciplinary literary research. Essays in honor of Prof. Bo Pettersson], 241–248. Turku, Finland: Eetos.Suche in Google Scholar

Sklar, Howard. 2018. Memoir’ as counter-narrative: Reimagining the self in Roth’s The Plot Against America. Akademisk Kvarter/Academic Quarter 17. 23–36. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.ak.v0i17.2507.Suche in Google Scholar

Sklar, Howard. 2024. “Why are you hiding here?” Counter-narrating antisemitic master-narratives in Bernard Malamud’s The Fixer. Narrative Works 13(1). 108–126. https://doi.org/10.7202/1115726ar.Suche in Google Scholar

Sternberg, Meir. 1978. Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tan, Ed. 1994. Film-induced affect as a witness emotion. Poetics 23. 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)00024-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilkerson, Isabel. 2010. The warmth of other suns: The epic story of America’s great migration. New York: Vintage.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Thomas Chatterton. 2023. Don’t censor racism out of the past. The Atlantic, 9 June. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/06/french-connection-racist-slurs-censorship/674341/ (accessed 13 January 2025).Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Richard. 2008 [1940]. The ethics of living Jim Crow: An autobiographical sketch. In Richard Wright (ed.), Uncle Tom’s children, 1–15. New York: Harper Perennial.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-06-18
Published in Print: 2025-07-28

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/fns-2025-2013/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen