What linguists think everyone should know about language – on extracting salience from open-ended responses
-
Tomas Lehecka
und
Jan-Ola Östman
Abstract
The study reports on a global survey asking linguists what they think everyone should know about language. Specifically, we asked linguists to formulate questions that it would be important for the general public to know the answer to. We received 3,349 suggestions for such questions from 538 linguists from 49 different countries. The study undertakes a content analysis of these open-ended responses. We analyze the text data at three levels of abstraction: (i) the overarching themes that the responses represent, (ii) the general questions about language that the individual responses relate to, and (iii) the specific topics that are mentioned in the responses. Results show that Variation and (language as a) System are the most recurrent themes among the responses, that ‘How and why do languages change?’ is the most frequently provided question, and that Language learning, Language structure, and Comparing languages are the most prevalent topics in the data. We contend that these findings reflect what issues are the most salient to linguists when asked about language in general. However, we also show that there is considerable variation in the responses, indicating that not all linguists think of the same issues when asked what everyone should know about language. The study provides a foundation for discussions and further research on the practical value of language-related knowledge for the general public.
Acknowledgments
We are extremely grateful to the anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions of improvement to an earlier version of this paper.
References
Akmajian, Adrian, Ann Kathleen Farmer, Lee Bickmore, Richard A. Demers & Robert M. Harnish (eds.). 2017. Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication, 7th edn. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Aristar-Dry, Helen & Michael Appleby. 2006. OLAC linguistic subject vocabulary. Available at: http://www.language-archives.org/REC/field.html.Suche in Google Scholar
Bargh, John A. & Tanya L. Chartrand. 2000. The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In Harry T. Reis & Charles M. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 253–285. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Peter Trudgill (eds.). 1998. Language myths. London: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2007. How language works: How babies babble, words change meaning and languages live or die. London: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Dawson, Hope & Michael Phelan (eds.). 2016. Language files: Materials for an introduction to language and linguistics, 12th edn. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.10.26818/9780814252703Suche in Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A., Jolene D. Smyth & Leah Melani Christian. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781394260645Suche in Google Scholar
Geer, John G. 1988. What do open-ended questions measure? Public Opinion Quarterly 52. 365–367. https://doi.org/10.1086/269113.Suche in Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10. 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520.Suche in Google Scholar
Higgins, E. Tory. 1996. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. Tory Higgins & Arie W. Kruglanski (eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 133–168. New York: Guilford Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Honda, Maya & Wayne O’Neil. 2017. On thinking linguistically. Revista Linguíʃtica 13. 52–65.Suche in Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2004. Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics 40. 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226703002342.Suche in Google Scholar
Johansson, Victoria, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer. 2013. Språket, människan och världen: Människans språk 1–2 [Language, humans and the world. The language of human beings 1–2]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Suche in Google Scholar
Larson, Richard, Kristin Denham & Anne Lobeck. 2019. The AP linguistics initiative. Language 95. e381–e393. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0064.Suche in Google Scholar
Lehecka, Tomas & Jan-Ola Östman. 2022. What should everyone know about language? On the fluidity of important questions in linguistics. Finnish Journal of Linguistics 35. 51–80.Suche in Google Scholar
Lehecka, Tomas & Jan-Ola Östman. 2023. Towards establishing what linguists think the general public should know about language: Salient versus important issues in linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 17(2). e12482. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12482.Suche in Google Scholar
Lehecka, Tomas & Jan-Ola Östman. 2024. Nordiska språkvetares åsikter om vad allmänheten bör veta om språk. [Nordic linguists’ opinions on what the general public should know about language]. Svenskans beskrivning 38(II). 196–217.Suche in Google Scholar
Leiner, Dominik J. 2019. SoSci Survey (Version 3.1. 06). [Computer software]. Available at: https://www.soscisurvey.de.Suche in Google Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey & Yakov Kronrod. 2014. Expanding our reach and theirs: When linguists go to high school. Language and Linguistics Compass 8. 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12094.Suche in Google Scholar
Mayring, Philipp. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.Suche in Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2002. The power of Babel: A natural history of language. London: Heinemann.Suche in Google Scholar
Mikolov, Tomas, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado & Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.Suche in Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo & Vera Lee-Schoenfeld. 2010. Language matters: A guide to everyday questions about language, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Peterson, Robert A. 2000. Constructing effective questionnaires. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781483349022Suche in Google Scholar
QS. 2020. QS world university rankings for linguistics. Available at: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar
Reimers, Nils & Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. arXiv. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084.10.18653/v1/D19-1410Suche in Google Scholar
Robinson, Sarah. 2019. Fund drive 2019: 29 years of LINGUIST List! Available at: https://linguistlist.org/issues/30/30-1184/.Suche in Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard & Stanley Presser. 1979. The open and closed question. American Sociological Review 44. 692–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094521.Suche in Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard & Stanley Presser. 1996. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwarz, Norbert. 1995. Social cognition: Information accessibility and use in social judgment. In Edward E. Smith & Daniel N. Osherson (eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science, 345–376. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwarz, Norbert. 1999. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist 54. 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93.Suche in Google Scholar
Selvi, Ali Fuad. 2019. Qualitative content analysis. In Jim McKinley & Heath Rose (eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics, 440–452. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780367824471-37Suche in Google Scholar
Sutrop, Urmas. 2001. List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Methods 13. 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0101300303.Suche in Google Scholar
Thompson, Eric C. & Zhang Juan. 2006. Comparative cultural salience: Measures using free-list data. Field Methods 18. 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x06293128.Suche in Google Scholar
Tourangeau, Roger, Lance J. Rips & Kenneth Rasinski. 2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819322Suche in Google Scholar
Wagner, Laura, Sumurye Awani, Nikole D. Patson & Rebekah Stanhope. 2023. To what extent does the general public endorse language myths? Language and Linguistics Compass 17(3). e12486. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12486.Suche in Google Scholar
Wong, Fillmore, Lily & Catherine E. Snow. 2002. What teachers need to know about language. In Carolyn Temple Adger, Catherine E. Snow & Donna Christian (eds.), What teachers need to know about language, 7–53. McHenry: Delta Systems.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2025-2020).
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
