Polyfunctional heri (হেৰি) in Assamese: a view from Discourse Grammar
-
Abhijnan Pritam Sarma
,
Tohru Seraku
und
Sweta Sinha
Abstract
Whilst there is a wealth of morphosyntactic studies on Assamese (Indo–Aryan), little attention has been paid to its semantic and pragmatic aspects. In this paper, we describe the polyfunctional item heri in Assamese, drawing on examples from podcasts, supplemented by film and web series scripts. We show that heri functions as a vocative (politely addressing an unknown person), a placeholder (substituting for a target form), an interjective hesitator (filling pauses interjectively), a general extender (yielding a conjunctive or disjunctive list reading), and a discourse marker (initiating new conversation topics). Furthermore, we model the grammatical, functional, and prosodic properties of heri across these distinct uses and analyse them in the framework of Discourse Grammar. The placeholder and general extender uses fall within the Sentence Grammar domain, and the vocative, interjective hesitator, and discourse marker uses are situated in the Thetical Grammar domain. Also, the developments of the interjective hesitator and discourse marker uses are examined through the lens of cooptation, a pragmatic operation whereby a unit in Sentence Grammar is recruited as a unit in Thetical Grammar. This study represents the first functional–grammatical analysis of Assamese based on spontaneous data.
Acknowledgments
This work greatly benefitted from the feedback received at the conference Placeholders in East and West (10–11 October 2024, University of Tübingen), where the first and third authors delivered a talk related to this study. We also extend our gratitude to Rijushna Gogoi and Bibek Nayan Deka for their assistance with data transcription and annotation, as well as to our language consultants, Padma Kumari Gogoi and Debraj Gogoi.We are also grateful to Dr. Jagat Chandra Kalita for his insightful feedback on the glosses of our speech data examples.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Abhijnan Pritam Sarma (first author/corresponding author); Conceptualisation; Data curation; Writing (original draft: Section 2.1, Section 3); Reviewing/editing. Tohru Seraku (second author); Conceptualisation; Writing (original draft: Section 1, Sections 2.2–2.3, Sections 4–6); Reviewing/editing. Sweta Sinha (third author); Conceptualisation; Reviewing.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: Not applicable.
-
Data availability: Not applicable. Data is drawn from freely accessible web sources.
References
Amiridze, Nino, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.). 2010. Fillers, pauses and placeholders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.93Suche in Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 2010. A contrastive approach to vague nouns. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 35–48. Bingley: Emerald.10.1163/9789004253247_004Suche in Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Balckwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Computer program, version 6.4.13. http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 17 March 2025).Suche in Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2005. Parentheticals. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 179–182. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02013-7Suche in Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Choudhary, Narayan (ed.). 2021. Compendium of linguistic resources in Indian languages. Mysuru: CIIL Printing Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1995. In search of English: A traveller’s guide. ELT Journal 49. 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.2.107.Suche in Google Scholar
Das, Palash, Madhumita Barbora & Utpal Sharma. 2019. Morphological rule formulation for nouns in Assamese to develop morphological tools. Language in India 19. Available at: https://languageinindia.com/feb2019/palash1.pdf.10.34256/ijll2021Suche in Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67. 726–762. https://doi.org/10.2307/415075.Suche in Google Scholar
Fehn, Anne-Maria, Bonny Sands, Jeremy Coburn, Andrew Harvey & Kirk Miller. 2024. Placeholders in selected hunter-gatherer languages from Africa. Paper presented at the Placeholders in East and West conference, University of Tübingen, 10–11 October.Suche in Google Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry, Yury Lander & Timur Maisak. 2010. From interrogatives to placeholders in Udi and Agul spontaneous narratives. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, pauses and placeholders, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.93.05ganSuche in Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto & Kyung-eun Yoon. 2006. A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. Studies in Language 30. 485–540. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.30.3.02hay.Suche in Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 2008. A grammar of Jamsay. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207224Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51. 1205–1247. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048.Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2023. The grammar of interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192871497.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva. 2013a. On the origin of grammar. In Claire Lefebvre, Bernard Comrie & Henri Cohen (eds.), New perspectives on the origins of language, 379–405. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.144.15heiSuche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long. 2013b. An outline of discourse grammar. In Shannon T. Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional approaches to language, 155–206. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110285321.155Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long. 2017. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics 55. 813–855. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0012.Suche in Google Scholar
Jadoul, Yannick, Bill Thompson & Bart de Boer. 2018. Introducing Parselmouth: A Python interface to Praat. Journal of Phonetics 71. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and resource. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence, 63–92. New York: Irvington Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kakati, Banikanta. 1941. Assamese, its formation and development. Madras: G. S. Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kakati, Banamali. 1973. Structures and classes in the grammar of Assamese. London: University of London dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Kalita, Jagat C. 2003. Nouns and nominalisations in Assamese: A microlinguistic study. Guwahati: Gauhati University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine. 2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains? In Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 348–363. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0021Suche in Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35. 852–897. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. 1990. Whatchamacallem. English Today 6. 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078400004569.Suche in Google Scholar
Mahanta, Shakuntala. 2012. Assamese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42. 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100312000096.Suche in Google Scholar
Markus, Elena & Fedor Rozhanskiy. 2023. Functions of demonstrative pronouns in contemporary Soikkola Ingrian. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 14. 41–74. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2023.14.2.03.Suche in Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin. 2015. Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 189–221. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584194.ch9Suche in Google Scholar
Nagaya, Naonori. 2022. Beyond questions: Non-interrogative uses of ano ‘what’ in Tagalog. Journal of Pragmatics 190. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.007.Suche in Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann & George Yule. 2021. General extenders: The forms and functions of a new linguistic category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108938655Suche in Google Scholar
Sarma, Abhijnan P. & Sweta Sinha. in press. The placeholder heri in Assamese spoken discourse: A study of its morphosyntax and pragmatic functions. Manusya: Journal of Humanities.Suche in Google Scholar
Seraku, Tohru. 2022a. Interactional and rhetorical functions of placeholders: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 187. 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.023.Suche in Google Scholar
Seraku, Tohru. 2022b. Referring to arbitrary entities with placeholders. Pragmatics 32. 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20076.ser.Suche in Google Scholar
Seraku, Tohru. 2023. Grammars for placeholders: The dynamic turn. Glossa 8. 1–44. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9174.Suche in Google Scholar
Seraku, Tohru. 2024a. Japanese unnun as a meta-discourse placeholder: Exploring its grammatical and functional properties. Pragmatics & Cognition 31. 156–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00043.ser.Suche in Google Scholar
Seraku, Tohru. 2024b. Placeholders in crosslinguistic perspective: Abilities, preferences, and usage motives. Linguistics 62. 1473–1498. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2023-0068.Suche in Google Scholar
Seraku, Tohru. 2025. Placeholders and interjective hesitators: A crosslinguistic and functional approach. Studies in Language 49. 376–411. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23057.ser.Suche in Google Scholar
Sloetjes, Han & Peter Wittenburg. 2008. Annotation by category: ELAN and ISO DCR. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis & Daniel Tapias (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on language resources and evaluation, 816–820. Paris: European Language Resources Association.Suche in Google Scholar
Sonnenhauser, Barbara & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna. 2013. Introduction: Vocative!. In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative!, 1–23. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110304176.1Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Tamuli, Jyotiprakash & Golak C. Goswami. 2003. Asamiya. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo–Aryan languages, 429–484. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Vallejos-Yopán, Rosa. 2023. From demonstrative to filler: Este in Amazonian Spanish and beyond. Linguistics 61. 651–678. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0137.Suche in Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory & Betty Birner. 1993. The semantics and pragmatics of and everything. Journal of Pragmatics 19. 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90028-n.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028370Suche in Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Huiling Xu. 2022. Indefiniteness, interrogativity, and speaker stance: Insights from the extended uses of ‘what’-words in Chaozhou. Journal of Pragmatics 200. 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.018.Suche in Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1974. Hey, whatsyourname!. In Michael La Galy, Robert Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, 787–801. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
