The grammaticalization path of the Kaakye relative clause marker
-
Levina Nyameye Abunya
Abstract
Languages develop their relative markers from a variety of sources. This paper examines the paths along which the relative marker in Kaakye, (a Kwa Niger-Congo language) has developed. Using the concept of grammaticalization as a framework, evidence suggests that the Kaakye relative marker kɛ́ originates from the manner demonstrative adverb kɛ́nɩ̀ŋ̀, which means ‘in such a manner’ or ‘like this/that.’ The grammaticalization process begins with desemanticization, where the adverb’s concrete meaning, tied to its deictic reference, is first used to specify a referent noun phrase. Over time, this function evolves into a more abstract grammatical element, ultimately developing into a relative marker. Other mechanisms of grammaticalization such as extension, decategorialization and erosion, and Hopper’s principles of divergence associated with development process are discussed. Though the relativizer is derived from a demonstrative as it is attested in other languages, the particular grammaticalization path identified is quite unique. The paper contributes to the study of grammaticalization in general and provides a particular piece of evidence to support demonstratives as sources of relative markers.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to the language consultants: Vincent Oxford Denteh, Moses Danso, Linda Ntumy, James Owusu and Matthew Akuru, who assisted with data verification and interpretation.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: AI to improve language.
-
Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
Abunya, Levina N. 2010. Kaakyi verbal morphology. Ghana: University of Ghana MPhil thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Abunya, Levina N. 2018. Aspects of Kaakye grammar. Ghana: University of Ghana PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Abunya, Levina N. & Nana A. A. Amfo. 2013. Grammaticalization in Kaakyi: From a temporal adverb to a future tense marker. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 45(1). 26–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.897813.Suche in Google Scholar
Abunya, Levina N. & Emmanuel K. Osam. 2022. Relativization in Kaakye. Legon Journal of the Humanities 33(1). 1–38. https://doi.org/10.4314/ljh.v33i1.1.Suche in Google Scholar
Adonae, Daniels. 2005. Tonology. University of Ghana. M.Phil thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Agbedor, Paul K & Daniels Adonae. 2005. Pronouns in Kaakyi and Ewe: A comparison. In Mary E. Kropp-Dakubu & Emmanuel K. Osam (eds.), Studies in the Languages of the Volta Basin 3: Proceedings of The Annual Colloquim of the Legon-Trondheim Linguistics project, 96–103. Ghana: UG-Legon.Suche in Google Scholar
Amfo, Nana A. A. & Stella Norgbe. 2009. Comparing demonstratives in Kwa. Legon Journal of the Humanities 20. 181–211.Suche in Google Scholar
Asante, Rogers. K. & Qiuwu Ma. 2016. Relative clause constructions in Nkami. Studies In African Linguistics 45(1&2). 1–33. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v45i1.107256.Suche in Google Scholar
Ballarè, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese. 2021. The development of locative relative markers: From typology to sociolinguistics (and back). Studies in Language 46(1). 220–257. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20013.bal.Suche in Google Scholar
Bisilki, Abraham K., Quint Nicolas & Yakpo Kofi. 2024. Relativization in Likpakpaln (Ghana): New typological perspectives on the Mabia (Gur) languages. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 69(2). 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2024.17.Suche in Google Scholar
Boadi, L. A. 2005. Syntactic structures in Akan: Interrogatives, complementation and relativization. Accra: Black Mask Limited.Suche in Google Scholar
Bobuafor, Mercy. 2013. A grammar of Tafi. The Netherlands: Leiden University PhD Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Cognitive process in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 145–167. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=FA70DA8CF465C9C067E31990808F7DDB29/05/2017.Suche in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2003. The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language 27(3). 635–655, https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.06die.Suche in Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Dorvlo, Kofi. 2008. A grammar of Logba. The Netherlands: Leiden University PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Dundaa, Mark. 2000. Kaakye vowel harmony. Seminar paper. Tamale: Ghana Institute of Linguistics, Literacy and Bible Translation. Tamale.Suche in Google Scholar
Dundaa, Mark. 2005. Noun morphology. In A paper presented at the GILLBT seminar week 1st–4th February 2005 at Kanvilli Training Centre, Tamale.Suche in Google Scholar
Dundaa, Mark. 2012. Question formation in Kaakyi. Unpublished term paper, Department of Linguistics. University of Ghana.Suche in Google Scholar
Dundaa, Mark & Dominic Nyaaba. 2007. Unpublished collected field reports on the phonology of Kaakye. Tamale: Ghana Institute of Linguitics, Literacy, and Bible Translation.Suche in Google Scholar
Dzameshie, Alexander K. 1995. Syntactic characteristics of Ewe RC constructions. Research Review 11(1&2). 27–42.Suche in Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph & Kateřina Havranová. 2014. Diachronic development of English relativizers: A study in grammar competition. In Michaela Martinková, Markéta Janebová & Jaroslav Macháček (eds.), Categories and categorial changes: The third syntactical plan and beyond, 149–174. Czechia: Palacky University Olomouc.Suche in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2012. Toward a diachronic typology of relative clause. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Relative clauses in languages of the Americas: A typological overview, 1–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.102.01givSuche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6). 1043–1068.10.1515/ling.37.6.1043Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 573–601. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756393.ch18Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Hünnemeyer Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2004. World Lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=7BA8B35BAED286468F52400DFFD41B2410/10/2016.Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.Suche in Google Scholar
Hendery, Rachel. 2007. A diachronic typology of relative clauses. The Australian National University PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Hendery, Rachel. 2010. Grammaticalisation of discourse marking elements in relative clauses. In Rachel Hendery & Jennifer Hendriks (eds.), Grammatical change: Theory and description, 105–122. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar
Hendery, Rachel. 2012. Relative clauses in time and space: A case study in the methods of diachronic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.101Suche in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth. C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 17–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason & Harold Torrence. 2011. How why is different: Wh-in-situ in Krachi. Snippets 23. 5–6.Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason & Harold Torrence. 2012. Krachi wh- in-situ: A question of prosody. In J. Choi, E. A. Hogue, J. Punske, D. Tat, J. Schertz & A. Trueman (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th West Coast conference on formal linguistics, 362–370. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason & Harold Torrence. 2013. Unweaving the interrogative rainbow: The interplay between syntax, semantics, and prosody in four Tano languages In Paper presented at ACAL 44. Georgetown University.Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason & Harold Torrence. 2016. Predicate focus in Krachi: 2 probes, 1 goal, 3 PFs. In K. Kim, P. Umbal, T. Block, Q. Chan, T. Cheng, K. Finney, M. Katz, S. Nickel-Thompson & L. Shorten (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd West Coast conference on formal linguistics, 227–236. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. www.lingref.com,document#3242 (accessed 20 February 2017).Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason & Harold Torrence. 2017a. Africa’s endangered languages: An overview. In Jason Kandybowicz & Harold Torrence (eds.), Africa’s endangered languages: Documentary and theoretical approaches, 1–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190256340.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason & Harold Torrence. 2017b. On prosodic variation and the distribution of wh-in-situ. Linguistic Variation 17(1). 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.17.1.06kan.Suche in Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, J. & H. Torrence. 2019. A first look at Krachi clausal determiners. In M. Bowler, P. T. Duncan, T. Major & H. Torrence (eds.), Schuhschrift: Papers in honor of Russell Schuh, 66–76. Los Angeles: eScholarship Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II, 141–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Korboe, Joseph A. 2001. Pluralization in Kaakyi. Ghana. University of Ghana Graduate Diploma Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Korboe, Joseph A. 2002. The study of the nominal phrase in Kaakyi. Ghana: University of Ghana MA Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania & Bernard Comrie. 2005. The typology of relative clause formation in African languages. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz (ed.), Studies in African linguistics typology, 209–228. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.64.12kutSuche in Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316479704Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1986. On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics 24. 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.663.Suche in Google Scholar
McCracken, Chelsea. 2013. Relative clauses in Asante Twi. In Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4. Fall.Suche in Google Scholar
Saah, Kofi K. 2010. Relative clauses in Akan. In Enoch O. Aboh & James Essegbey (eds.), Topics in Kwa Syntax, 91–107. London & New York: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.10.1007/978-90-481-3189-1_5Suche in Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette. 2023. From possessive to relative clause marker: A grammaticalization pathway in the Timor-Alor-Pantar languages. Language Typology and Universals 76(3) 369–401. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2023-2014.Suche in Google Scholar
Schuh, Russel G. 1977. Bade/Ngizim determiner system. Afroasiatic Linguistics 4(3). 1–74.Suche in Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F. & Charles D. Fennig. 2018. Ethnologue: Languages of the world., 21st edn. Dallas: Texas SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com (Accessed May 2018).Suche in Google Scholar
Snider, Keith L. 1989. North Guang comparative wordlist: Chumburung, Krachi, Nawuri, Gichode, Gonja. Comparative African Wordlists No. 4. Legon: Institute of African Studies.Suche in Google Scholar
Snider, Keith L. 1990. Tonal upstep in Krachi: Evidence for register tier. Language 66. 453–474, https://doi.org/10.2307/414608.Suche in Google Scholar
Torrence, Harold & Jason Kandybowicz. 2013. Comparative Tano interrogative syntax: The view from Krachi and Bono. In Ola Orie Olanike & Karen W. Sanders (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 43rd annual conference on African linguistics, 222–234. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Suche in Google Scholar
Torrence, Harold & Jason Kandybowicz. 2015. Wh-question formation in Krachi. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 36(2). 253–285, https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2015-0011.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2001. Legitimate counterexamples to unidirectionality. In Paper presented at Freiburg University October 17th 2001. www.stanford.edu/,traugott/papers/Freiburg.Unidirect.pdf (accessed 11 April 2008).Suche in Google Scholar
Williamson, Kay & Roger M. Blench. 2000. Niger-Congo. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), African languages: An introduction, 11–42. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Stephen Matthews & Kaoru Horie. 2004. From pronominalizer to pragmatic marker: Implications for unidirectionality from a crosslinguistic perspective. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline – the nature of grammaticalization [typological studies in language 59], 137–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.59.08yapSuche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
