Startseite Lessons from Latin America Dollarization in the Twenty First Century
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Lessons from Latin America Dollarization in the Twenty First Century

  • Nicolas Cachanosky EMAIL logo , Emilio Ocampo und Alexander W. Salter
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. April 2023

Abstract

This paper looks at twenty first-century dollarization in Latin America. We emphasize that dollarization is a complex reform that can be implemented in many different ways. We draw three important lessons from these experiences: (1) keeping the central bank after dollarizing is an unnecessary institutional vulnerability that facilitates compulsive de-dollarization, (2) public opinion offers the most important defense of dollarization against populist attempts at reversal, and (3) even if dollarization is not supported with structural reforms (or such reforms are reversed), it remains superior to the counterfactual of no reforms with persistent, high and volatile inflation.


Corresponding author: Nicolas Cachanosky, Center for Free Enterprise, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA, E-mail:

References

Absher, S., K. Grier, and R. Grier. 2020. “The Economic Consequences of Durable Left-Populist Regimes in Latin America.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 177: 787–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Abts, K., and S. Rummens. 2007. “Populism versus Democracy.” Political Studies 55 (2): 405–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.10.1355/ae29-2jSuche in Google Scholar

Arauz, A., R. Garrat, F. Ramos, and F. Diego. 2021. “Dinero Electrónico: The Rise and Fall of Ecuador’s Central Bank Digital Currency.” Latin American Journal of Central Banking 2 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/j.latcb.2021.100030.10.1016/j.latcb.2021.100030Suche in Google Scholar

Banco Central de, Ecuador.. 20 Años de Dolarización en Ecuador: Análisis del Sector Monetario y Financiero (No. 83; Nota Técnica). Quito Ecuador: Banco Central de Ecuador.Suche in Google Scholar

Beckerman, P., and A. Solimano, eds. 2002. Crisis and Dollarization in Ecuador: Stability, Growth and Social Equity. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-4837-XSuche in Google Scholar

Bernanke, B. 2003. “Constrained Discretion” and Monetary Policy. New York: Money Marketeers of New York University.Suche in Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, C. 2019. “Populism: Three Approaches to an International Problem.” Economic Affairs 39 (2): 273–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12356.Suche in Google Scholar

Boettke, P. J., A. W. Salter, and D. J. Smith. 2021. Money and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108806787Suche in Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. 1987. “The Constitution of Economic Policy.” The American Economic Review 77 (3): 243–50.10.1126/science.236.4807.1433Suche in Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M., and G. Brennan. 1980. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Volume 9. The Power to Tax. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Suche in Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M., and G. Tullock. 1962. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Volume 3. The Calculus of Consent. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Suche in Google Scholar

Cachanosky, N., and A. Padilla. 2019. “Latin American Populism in the 21st Century.” Independent Review 24 (2): 209–66. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3147096.Suche in Google Scholar

Cachanosky, N., and A. Padilla. 2020. “A Panel Data Analysis of Latin American Populism.” Constitutional Political Economy 31 (3): 329–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-020-09302-w.Suche in Google Scholar

Cachanosky, N., B. P. Cutsinger, T. L. Hogan, W. J. Luther, and A. W. Salter. 2021. “The Federal Reserve’s Response to the COVID‐19 Contraction: An Initial Appraisal.” Southern Economic Journal 87 (4): 1152–74, https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12498.Suche in Google Scholar

Cachanosky, N., A. W. Salter, and I. Savanti. 2022. “Can Dollarization Constrain a Populist Leader? The Case of Rafael Correa in Ecuador.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 200: 430–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Calvo, G. A. 2001. “Capital Markets and the Exchange Rate, with Special Reference to the Dollarization Debate in Latin America.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 33 (2): 312–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673902.Suche in Google Scholar

Cardoso, F. E. 2006. “More than Ideology: The Conflation of Populism with the Left in Latin America.” Harvard International Review 28 (2): 14–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Chesterley, N., and P. Roberti. 2016. Populism and Institutional Capture (Working Paper DSE). Bologna: Universita di Bologna.10.2139/ssrn.2881435Suche in Google Scholar

Chinn, M. D., and H. Ito. 2006. “What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions.” Journal of Development Economics 81 (1): 163–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.05.010.Suche in Google Scholar

de la Torre, C. 2016. “Populism and the Politics of the Extraordinary in Latin America.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21 (2): 121–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1150137.Suche in Google Scholar

de la Torre, C. 2017a. “Populism in Latin America.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by C. R. Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.8Suche in Google Scholar

de la Torre, C. 2017b. “Populism and Nationalism in Latin America.” Javnost – The Public 24 (4): 375–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330731.Suche in Google Scholar

Demsetz, H. 1969. “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint.” The Journal of Law and Economics 12 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/466657.Suche in Google Scholar

Dornbusch, R., and S. Edwards. 1990. “Macroeconomic Populism.” Journal of Development Economics 32 (2): 247–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(90)90038-d.Suche in Google Scholar

Doyle, D. 2011. “The Legitimacy of Political Institutions: Explaining Contemporary Populism in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (11): 1447–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407469.Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, S. 2010. Left Behind: Latin America and the False Promise of Populism. Chicago, London: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226184807.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, S. 2019a. “Monetary Policy, Fiscal Dominance, Contracts, and Populism.” Cato Journal 39 (1): 33–50.Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, S. 2019b. “On Latin American Populism, and its Echoes Around the World.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (4): 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.76.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, S. 1982. “Seigniorage and the Case for a National Money.” Journal of Political Economy 90 (2): 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/261057.Suche in Google Scholar

Friedman, M. 1973. “Monetary Policy in Developing Countries.” In Money and Economic Development: The Horowitz Lectures of 1972, 36–67. New York: Praeger.Suche in Google Scholar

Grier, K., and N. Maynard. 2016. “The Economic Consequences of Hugo Chavez: A Synthetic Control Analysis.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 125: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.12.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Hawkins, K. A., R. Aguilar, B. C. Silva, E. K. Jenne, B. Kocijan, and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2019. “Global Populism Database.” Harvard Dataverse 1, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LFTQEZ.Suche in Google Scholar

Helleiner, E. 2003. “US Policy Towards Latin America Coming Full Circle?” Review of International Political Economy 10 (3): 406–29.10.1080/09692290308424Suche in Google Scholar

Hogan, T. L. 2015. “Has the Fed Improved U.S. Economic Performance?” Journal of Macroeconomics 43: 257–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.11.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Horwitz, S. G. 2011. “Do We Need a Distinct Monetary Constitution?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 80 (2): 331–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.010.Suche in Google Scholar

International Monetary Fund. 2021. Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Washington, DC: IMF.Suche in Google Scholar

Kydland, F. E., and E. C. Prescott. 1977. “Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans.” Journal of Political Economy 85 (3): 473–92. https://doi.org/10.1086/260580.Suche in Google Scholar

Margalit, Y. 2019. “Economic Insecurity and the Causes of Populism, Reconsidered.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (4): 152–70. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.152.Suche in Google Scholar

Mazzuca, S. L. 2013. “The Rise of Rentier Populism.” Journal of Democracy 24 (2): 108–22. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0034.Suche in Google Scholar

Moreno-Villalaz, J. L. 1999. “Lessons from the Monetary Experience of Panama: A Dollar Economy with Financial Integration.” Cato Journal 18 (3): 421–39.Suche in Google Scholar

Moreno-Villalaz, J. L. 2005. “Financial Integration and Dollarization: The Case of Panama.” Cato Journal 25 (1): 127–40.Suche in Google Scholar

Nino, C. S. 1992. Un País al Margen de la Ley: Estudio de la Anomia como Componente del Subdesarrollo Argentino. Emecé Editores.Suche in Google Scholar

North, D. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112.10.1257/jep.5.1.97Suche in Google Scholar

Ocampo, E. 2015a. Commodity Price Booms and Populist Cycles. An Explanation of Argentina’s Decline in the 20th Century (Documentos de Trabajo). Buenos Aires: UCEMA.Suche in Google Scholar

Ocampo, E. 2015b. Entrampados en la Farsa: El Populismo y la Decadencia Argentina. Buenos Aires: Claridad.Suche in Google Scholar

Ocampo, E. 2019. The Economic Analysis of Populism: A Selective Review of the Literature (Documentos de Trabajo). Buenos Aires: UCEMA.10.2139/ssrn.3421752Suche in Google Scholar

Ocampo, E. 2022. “Fiscal and Monetary Anomie in Argentina: A Legacy of Endemic Populism.” In UCEMA Documentos de Trabajo 836.Suche in Google Scholar

Ocampo, E., and N. Cachanosky. 2022. Dolarización: Una Solución para Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Claridad.Suche in Google Scholar

Romero, P. P., and S. Sandoval. 2019. La Dolarización no Requiere de un Banco Central Activo (Koyuntura). Quito: Universidad de San Francisco de Quito.Suche in Google Scholar

Sachs, J. D., and F. Larrain. 1999. “Why Dollarization is More a Straitjacket than Salvation.” Foreign Policy 116: 80–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149645.Suche in Google Scholar

Sachs, J. D., and A. M. Warner. 1995. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. Working Paper. Cambridge: NBER.10.3386/w5398Suche in Google Scholar

Salter, A. W. 2014. “Is There a Self-Enforcing Monetary Constitution?” Constitutional Political Economy 25 (3): 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9163-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Salter, A. W., and A. T. Young. 2018. “A Theory of Self-Enforcing Monetary Constitutions with Reference to the Suffolk System, 1825–1858.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 156: 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.10.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Schuler, K. 2005. “Some Theory and History of Dollarization.” Cato Journal 25 (1): 115–25.Suche in Google Scholar

Selgin, G. A. 1994. “On Ensuring the Acceptability of a New Fiat Money.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 26 (4): 808–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077948.Suche in Google Scholar

Selgin, G. A., W. D. Lastrapes, and L. H. White. 2012. “Has the Fed Been a Failure?” Journal of Macroeconomics 34 (3): 569–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Sumner, S. 2021. The Money Illusion. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226773711.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Waldmann, P. 2003. El Estado Anómico. Derecho, Seguridad Pública y Vida Cotidiana en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad.Suche in Google Scholar

Waldmann, P. 2004. “Transición Democrática y Anomia Social en Perspectiva Comparada.” In Sobre el Concepto de Estado Anómico, edited by W. L. Bernecker, 103–24. El Colegio de México.10.2307/j.ctvhn08nc.7Suche in Google Scholar

Weyland, K. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412.Suche in Google Scholar

Weyland, K. 2003. “Latin American Neopopulism.” Third World Quarterly 24 (6): 1095–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590310001630080.Suche in Google Scholar

White, L. H. 1999. The Theory of Monetary Institutions. Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

White, L. H. 2018. “The World’s First Central Bank Electronic Money Has Come – And Gone: Ecuador, 2014–2018.” In Alt-M: Ideas for an Alternative Monetary Future. Also available at https://www.alt-m.org/2018/03/29/the-worlds-first-central-bank-electronic-money-has-come-and-gone-ecuador-2014-2018/#_ftn1.Suche in Google Scholar

White, L. H., V. J. Vanberg, and E. Köhler. 2015. Renewing the Search for a Monetary Constitution. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.Suche in Google Scholar

Witt, J. M. 2021. Así dolarizamos al Ecuador: Memorias de un acierto histórico en América Latina. Bogotá: Ariel Colombia.Suche in Google Scholar

Yeager, L. B., ed. 1962. In Search of a Monetary Constitution. Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674434813Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-01-07
Accepted: 2023-03-07
Published Online: 2023-04-03

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ev-2023-0001/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen