Startseite Medizin Development of a simple diagnostic tool predicting the aseptic nature of a joint effusion: a pragmatic pilot study
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Development of a simple diagnostic tool predicting the aseptic nature of a joint effusion: a pragmatic pilot study

  • Arthur Vrignaud ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Guillaume Direz , Amélie Denis und Emmanuelle Dernis
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. September 2025
Diagnosis
Aus der Zeitschrift Diagnosis

Abstract

Objectives

Among all of the swollen joints undergoing an aspiration in primary care, approximately 92 % are of nonseptic cause. This study therefore sought to develop a predictive model, based on simple clinical and paraclinical data, with the aim of predicting the aseptic nature of joint effusion.

Methods

This is a cohort, prospective, monocentric study. Some explanatory variables were predetermined on the basis of the literature review. A predictive model has been established based on these variables. In order to prioritise the negative predictive value, a cut-off point considering the best specificity for an observed sensitivity greater than or equal to 98 % was retained.

Results

A total of 328 participants, 49.1 % of whom were women, were included in this study, with a median age of 69 years. The median duration of evolution of joint effusion before the puncture was 30 days. Joint fluid had inflammatory characteristics in 46.0 % of cases and 8 septic arthritis were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the predictive model was evaluated at 0.93. The model includes the maximum temperature, the polyarticular nature of the clinical picture and the macroscopic appearance of the joint fluid.

Conclusions

This study made it possible to develop a simple and easily accessible predictive model in a primary care setting. This tool could make it possible to exclude a priori the septic aetiology of one out of four native joint effusions. Its performances remain to be determined on an independent population in a subsequent study (confirmation cohort in progress).


Corresponding author: Arthur Vrignaud, Plateforme de Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, 194, avenue Rubillard, 72037 Le Mans, France; Clinical Research Platform, Le Mans General Hospital, Le Mans, France and; Multidisciplinary Health Center of Conlie, Conlie, France, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Clémentine LELEU, Jean-Maxime PIOT, Romain BRIER, Sabine HOEFSLOOT, Jérémy CHATELAIS, Clémence VERNIER and Bénédicte HAETTICH for their participation in the inclusion and their monitoring participants in this clinical study.

The authors also thank Christelle JADEAU, Eglantine ROUANET, Morgane GOULVENT, Céline LAGRANGE and Jean-François HAMEL for their support in the investigation and statistical analyses of this research protocol.

  1. Research ethics: The study protocol has been evaluated and obtained the agreement of the “CPP Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer III” on the 21st January 2020.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. AV: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing, visualization, supervision, project administration. GD: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing, visualization. AD: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing, visualization. ED: conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, resources, writing, visualization, supervision, project administration.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: The datasets used and/or analysed for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1. Rutherford, AI, Subesinghe, S, Bharucha, T, Ibrahim, F, Kleymann, A, Galloway, JB. A population study of the reported incidence of native joint septic arthritis in the United Kingdom between 1998 and 2013. Rheumatology 2016;55:2176–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew323.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Rouiller, N, Petignat, P, Bally, F. Revue médicale suisse : Arthrite septique. Rev Med Suisse 2010;6:1914–7. https://doi.org/10.53738/revmed.2010.6.266.1914.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Margaretten, ME, Kohlwes, J, Moore, D, Bent, S. Does this adult patient have septic arthritis? JAMA 2007;297:1478–88. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.13.1478.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Kaandorp, CJ, Dinant, HJ, van de Laar, MA, Moens, HJ, Prins, AP, Dijkmans, BA. Incidence and sources of native and prosthetic joint infection: a community based prospective survey. Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56:470–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.56.8.470.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Sendi, P, Kühl, R, Aeberli, D, Zumstein, M. L’arthrite septique chez l’adulte. Forum Médical Suisse - Swiss Medical Forum 2017;17. https://doi.org/10.4414/fms.2017.02952.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Geirsson, AJ, Statkevicius, S, Víkingsson, A. Septic arthritis in Iceland 1990-2002: increasing incidence due to iatrogenic infections. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:638–43. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.077131.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Mathews, CJ, Weston, VC, Jones, A, Field, M, Coakley, G. Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet 2010;375:846–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61595-6.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Kennedy, N, Chambers, ST, Nolan, I, Gallagher, K, Werno, A, Browne, M, et al.. Native joint septic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, and microbiological causes in a New Zealand population. J Rheumatol 2015;42:2392–7. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150434.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Kaandorp, CJE, Schaardenburg, DV, Krijnen, P, Habbema, JDF, Mafjvd, L. Risk factors for septic arthritis in patients with joint disease. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:1819–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780381215.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Gavet, F, Tournadre, A, Soubrier, M, Ristori, JM, Dubost, JJ. Septic arthritis in patients aged 80 and older: a comparison with younger adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;53:1210–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53373.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. García-Arias, M, Balsa, A, Mola, EM. Septic arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol;25:407–21.10.1016/j.berh.2011.02.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Abram, SGF, Alvand, A, Judge, A, Beard, DJ, Price, AJ. Mortality and adverse joint outcomes following septic arthritis of the native knee: a longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving arthroscopic washout. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:341–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30419-0.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Valour, F, Bouaziz, A, Karsenty, J, Ader, F, Lustig, S, Laurent, F, et al.. Determinants of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus native bone and joint infection treatment failure: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:443. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-443.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Couderc, M, Bart, G, Coiffier, G, Godot, S, Seror, R, Ziza, J-M, et al.. French recommendations on the management of septic arthritis in an adult native joint. Jt Bone Spine 2020;87:538–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.07.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Landewé, RBM, Günther, KP, Lukas, C, Braun, J, Combe, B, Conaghan, PG, et al.. EULAR/EFORT recommendations for the diagnosis and initial management of patients with acute or recent onset swelling of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:12–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.104406.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Ma, L, Cranney, A, Holroyd-Leduc, JM. Acute monoarthritis: what is the cause of my patient’s painful swollen joint? CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J) 2009;180:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080183.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Shmerling, RH, Delbanco, TL, Tosteson, ANA, Trentham, DE. Synovial fluid tests: what should be ordered? JAMA 1990;264:1009–14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450080095039.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Jeng, GW, Wang, CR, Liu, ST, Su, CC, Tsai, RT, Yeh, TS, et al.. Measurement of synovial tumor necrosis factor-alpha in diagnosing emergency patients with bacterial arthritis. Am J Emerg Med 1997;15:626–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90173-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Freed, JF, Nies, KM, Boyer, RS, Louie, JS. Acute monoarticular arthritis. A diagnostic approach. JAMA 1980;243:2314–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1980.03300480034021.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Parker, JD, Capell, HA. An acute arthritis clinic--one year’s experience. Br J Rheumatol 1986;25:293–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/25.3.293.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Hindle, P, Davidson, E, Biant, LC. Septic arthritis of the knee: the use and effect of antibiotics prior to diagnostic aspiration. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94:351–5. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588412x13171221591015.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Vittecoq, O, Rottenberg, P, Lequerré, T, Michelin, P. Démarche diagnostique et traitement devant une douleur du genou de l’adulte (en l’absence de traumatisme) [Internet]. AKOS (Traité de Médecine); 2017. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1634-6939(17)66273-2.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Carpenter, CR, Schuur, JD, Everett, WW, Pines, JM. Evidence-based diagnostics: adult septic arthritis. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:781–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01121.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Janssens, HJEM, Fransen, J, van de Lisdonk, EH, van Riel, PLCM, van Weel, C, Janssen, M. A diagnostic rule for acute gouty arthritis in primary care without joint fluid analysis. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1120–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.196.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Kienhorst, LBE, Janssens, HJEM, Fransen, J, Janssen, M. The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study. Rheumatology 2015;54:609–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu378.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Couderc, M, Pereira, B, Mathieu, S, Schmidt, J, Lesens, O, Bonnet, R, et al.. Predictive value of the usual clinical signs and laboratory tests in the diagnosis of septic arthritis. CJEM 2015;17:403–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2014.56.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Dey, M, Al-Attar, M, Peruffo, L, Coope, A, Zhao, SS, Duffield, S, et al.. Assessment and diagnosis of the acute hot joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac606.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Clerc, O, Prod’hom, G, Greub, G, Zanetti, G, Senn, L. Adult native septic arthritis: a review of 10 years of experience and lessons for empirical antibiotic therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:1168–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr047.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Albert, JD, Le Corvec, M, Berthoud, O, David, C, Guennoc, X, Hoppe, E, et al.. Ruling out septic arthritis risk in a few minutes using mid-infrared spectroscopy in synovial fluids. Rheumatology 2021;60:1158–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa373.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Lieber, SB, Fowler, ML, Zhu, C, Moore, A, Shmerling, RH, Paz, Z. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in polyarticular septic arthritis. Jt Bone Spine 2018;85:469–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.09.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2025-03-20
Accepted: 2025-08-08
Published Online: 2025-09-12

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2025-0041/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen