Startseite Roots of the total testing process
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Roots of the total testing process

  • Matthew L. Rubinstein EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. Oktober 2019
Diagnosis
Aus der Zeitschrift Diagnosis Band 7 Heft 1

Abstract

Laboratory professionals can contribute to improvement of diagnosis in the context of the total testing process (TTP), a multidisciplinary framework complementary to the diagnostic process. While the testing process has been extensively characterized in the literature, needed is accurate identification of the source of the term “total testing process”. This article clarifies first appearance of the term in the literature and supplies a formal definition.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Author declaration: This paper is exempt from ethical approval.

References

1. Schiff GD, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert B, Elstein AS, et al. Diagnosing diagnosis errors: lessons from a multi-institutional collaborative project. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Rockville, MD, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Balogh E, Miller BT, Ball J, Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015.10.17226/21794Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47(Pt 2):101–10.10.1258/acb.2009.009222Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Baird G. Preanalytical considerations in blood gas analysis.Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2013;23:19–27.10.11613/BM.2013.005Suche in Google Scholar

5. Hawkins R. Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. Ann Lab Med 2012;32:5–16.10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Hickner J, Graham DG, Elder NC, Brandt E, Emsermann CB, Dovey S, et al. Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:194–200.10.1136/qshc.2006.021915Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Litchfield I, Bentham L, Lilford R, McManus RJ, Hill A, Greenfield S. Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:691–9.10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003712Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002;48:691–8.10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691Suche in Google Scholar

9. Boone J. Is it safe to have a laboratory test? Accred Qual Assur 2004;10:5–9.10.1007/s00769-004-0855-5Suche in Google Scholar

10. Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. J Am Med Assoc 1981;245:1762–3.10.1001/jama.1981.03310420052033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Gambino SR. Met and unmet needs of the automated clinical laboratory. Trans N Y Acad Sci 1970;32:816–20.10.1111/j.2164-0947.1970.tb02756.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Martin ML, Addison BV, Wagner WM, Essien JD, editors. 1989 Institute on critical issues: improving the quality of health management through clinician and laboratorian teamwork. Wilmington, DE: The Du Pont Company, 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Barr JT, Silver S. The total testing process and its implications for laboratory administration and education. Clin Lab Manage Rev 1994;8:526–42.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Inhorn SL, Addison BV, editors. 1986 Institute on critical issues in health laboratory practice: managing the quality of laboratory test results in a changing health care environment. Wilmington, DE: The Du Pont Company, 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

15. The Lewin Group. Laboratory medicine: a national status report. Prepared for Division of Laboratory Systems, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-09-05
Accepted: 2019-09-11
Published Online: 2019-10-04
Published in Print: 2020-01-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2019-0065/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen