Startseite Secondary Types of Pitch Accents of the Northern Aukštaitian Dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Secondary Types of Pitch Accents of the Northern Aukštaitian Dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language

  • Genovaitė Kačiuškienė EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. November 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Baltic languages remain of special interest for linguists because they contain many archaic features essential for the comparative research of Indo-European languages and reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European (Mikić 2014: 39). The Lithuanian prosodic system is characterized by free accent and two types of syllable accents (or tones) in the long stressed syllables. The stress is inherited from Indo-European and can fall on any syllable of a word, i. e. last, penultimate, antepenultimate etc. (Stundžia 2014: 12).

In the Northern Aukštaitian dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language, four types of syllable accents are possible in the long stressed syllables (more clearly heard in the diphthongs, less in the monophthongs): acute, circumflex, neoacute, neocircumflex (Garšva 1982: 65 ff.). These accents are positional allotones of two types of syllable accents: acute and circumflex. Two more types of accents are possible in strong syllables consisting of two central sounds: typical and atypical. Typical acute and circumflex accents are characteristic of verbs of non-iterative action and of “barytone” denominative words, atypical accents, with an emphasis on the second part of the stressed component, are characteristic of verbs of iterative action and of “oxytonic” denominative words (Kačiuškienė 2009: 34).

The article focuses on results of the auditory and instrumental experiment and demonstrates different auditory and acoustic properties of the secondary types of pitch accents of the Northern Aukštaitian Dialect of Panevėžys of the Lithuanian Language.

References

Дыбо Владимир 1997. Балто-славянская акцентологическая реконструкция и индоевропейская акцентология (Studia Linguarum: De omnibus linguae scilibus et quibusdam aliis). Москва: Российский государственный гуманитарный университет.Suche in Google Scholar

Garšva Kazimieras. 1982. Svarbesnės šiaurės vakarų panevėžiškių fonologijos ypatybės. Baltistica 18: 65−85.10.15388/baltistica.18.1.1542Suche in Google Scholar

Girdenis Aleksas. 2000. Kalbotyros darbai II. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Suche in Google Scholar

Гирденис Алексас, Качюшкене Геновайте. 2000 (1987). Вторичные типы слоговых интонаций в литовских диалектах. Kalbotyros darbai II. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Suche in Google Scholar

Kačiuškienė Genovaitė. 2006. Šiaurės panevėžiškių tarmės fonologijos bruožai. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.Suche in Google Scholar

Kačiuškienė Genovaitė. 2009. Some features of prosodic elements and vowel phonemes of the Northern Aukštaitian dialect of Panevėžys of Lithuania. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 17: 32−37.10.1515/DIG.2009.003Suche in Google Scholar

Kruopis Julius. 1971. Matematinė statistika. Vilnius: Mokslas.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov William. 1978. On the use of the present to explain the past. Readings in historical phonology. London: University Park-London.Suche in Google Scholar

Meiliūnaitė Violeta. 2008. Netvirtapradžių žodžio galo dvibalsių vienbalsinimo tendencijos pietų panevėžiškių patarmėje. Lituanistica 54: 51–59.Suche in Google Scholar

Mikić Aleksandar. 2014. A note on the words in the Baltic languages for some of the most ancient European grain legume crops. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 22: 39−45.10.1515/dialect-2014-0003Suche in Google Scholar

Pakerys Antanas. 1978. Lietuvių bendrinės kalbos fonetikos pratybos. Vilnius: Mokslas.Suche in Google Scholar

Pakerys Antanas. 1982. Lietuvių bendrinės kalbos prozodija. Vilnius: Mokslas.Suche in Google Scholar

Ručinskaitė Irena. 1984. Trys šiaurės panevėžiškių fonetikos etiudai. Vilnius: VU.Suche in Google Scholar

Stundžia Bonifacas. 2014. The Lithuanian language: Distinctive features, past and present. Vilnius: Science & Encyclopaedia Publishing Centre.Suche in Google Scholar

Švageris Evaldas. 2015. Akustinių požymių koreliacijos svarba lietuvių kalbos priegaidžių skyrimui. Baltistica 50: 91–113.10.15388/baltistica.50.1.2244Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-11-17
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dialect-2016-0005/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen