Startseite Borel subgroups of the plane Cremona group
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Borel subgroups of the plane Cremona group

  • Jean-Philippe Furter EMAIL logo und Isac Hedén ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. November 2022

Abstract

It is well known that all Borel subgroups of a linear algebraic group are conjugate. Berest, Eshmatov, and Eshmatov have shown that this result also holds for the automorphism group Aut ( 𝔸 2 ) of the affine plane. In this paper, we describe all Borel subgroups of the complex Cremona group Bir ( 2 ) up to conjugation, proving in particular that they are not necessarily conjugate. In principle, this fact answers a question of Popov. More precisely, we prove that Bir ( 2 ) admits Borel subgroups of any rank r { 0 , 1 , 2 } and that all Borel subgroups of rank r { 1 , 2 } are conjugate. In rank 0, there is a one-to-one correspondence between conjugacy classes of Borel subgroups of rank 0 and hyperelliptic curves of genus 1 . Hence, the conjugacy class of a rank 0 Borel subgroup admits two invariants: a discrete one, the genus , and a continuous one, corresponding to the coarse moduli space of hyperelliptic curves of genus . This moduli space is of dimension 2 - 1 .

Funding statement: The second author gratefully acknowledges support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, grant number KAW2016.0438.

A Computation of the derived length of n

In this appendix we give the proof of Proposition 1.4, stated in the introduction.

Proof of Proposition 1.4.

Set U k := D 2 n - 2 k ( n ) for 0 k n and V k := D ( U k ) for 1 k n .

We could easily check by induction that U k is contained in the group of elements f = ( f 1 , , f n ) in n satisfying f i = x i for i > k and that V k is contained in the group of elements f = ( f 1 , , f n ) in n satisfying f i = x i for i > k and f k = x k + b k with b k ( x k + 1 , , x n ) . This implies U 0 = { id } . Hence the derived length of n is at most 2 n .

Conversely, we will now prove that this derived length is at least 2 n , i.e. that V 1 { id } . For this, we introduce the following notation. For each k { 1 , , n } , each nonzero element a ( x k + 1 , , x n ) , and each element b ( x k + 1 , , x n ) , we define the dilatation d ( k , a ) Bir ( n ) and the elementary transformation e ( k , b ) Bir ( n ) by

d ( k , a ) = ( g 1 , , g n )

and

e ( k , b ) = ( h 1 , , h n ) ,

where g k = a x k , h k = x k + b and g i = h i = x i for i k .

If i { 1 , , n - 1 } and if G is a subgroup of Bir ( n ) , properties ( D i ) and ( E i ) for G are defined in the following way:

  1. There exists a ( x i + 1 ) such that d ( i , a ) G .

  2. For all b ( x i + 1 ) we have e ( i , b ) G .

For i = n , properties ( D n ) and ( E n ) are defined in the following slightly different way:

  1. There exists a { 0 , 1 } such that d ( n , a ) G .

  2. For all b we have e ( n , b ) G .

We will prove by decreasing induction on k that for each k { 1 , , n } the two following assertions hold:

  1. The group U k satisfies ( E i ) and ( D i ) for i { 1 , , k } .

  2. The group V k satisfies ( E i ) for i { 1 , , k } and ( D i ) for i { 1 , , k - 1 } .

We will use two obvious identities. The first one is

(A.1) [ d ( i , a ) , e ( i , b ) ] = e ( i , b ( a - 1 ) ) ,

where we have either i { 1 , , n - 1 } , a ( x i + 1 ) { 0 } , b ( x i + 1 ) , or i = n , a * , b .

The second one is

(A.2) [ d ( i , a ) , e ( i + 1 , c ) ] = d ( i , a ( x i + 1 ) a ( x i + 1 - c ) ) ,

where i { 1 , , n - 1 } , a ( x i + 1 ) { 0 } , c .

The identity (A.1) implies that if a subgroup G of Bir ( n ) satisfies ( D i ) and ( E i ) , then its derived subgroup D 1 ( G ) also satisfies ( E i ) .

Before making use of (A.2), let us check that if a ( x ) is nonconstant and c is nonzero, then a ( x ) / a ( x - c ) is nonconstant. Otherwise, we would have a ( x ) = λ a ( x - c ) for some λ * . This implies that the union U ( a ) of the zeros and poles of a is invariant by translation by c. Since U ( a ) is finite, it must be empty, proving that a is constant. A contradiction.

It follows from (A.2) and the last observation that if a subgroup G of Bir ( n ) satisfies ( D i ) and ( E i + 1 ) , then D 1 ( G ) also satisfies ( D i ) .

We are now ready for the induction. We begin by noting that the hypothesis ( a n ) is obviously satisfied. It is then enough to observe that we have ( a k ) ( b k ) for each k { 1 , , n } and ( b k ) ( a k - 1 ) for each k { 2 , , n } . ∎

B More on Borel subgroups of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1

We have seen in Theorem 10.9 that there is a natural bijection between the Borel subgroups of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) and the Borel subgroups of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 . Hence the interplay between PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) and PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 is very straightforward in this respect. Analogously the interplay between the set of conjugacy classes of Borel subgroups of Jonq and the set of conjugacy classes of Borel subgroups of Bir ( 2 ) is very clear: Any Borel subgroup of Jonq is a Borel subgroup of Bir ( 2 ) (Proposition 11.1); any Borel subgroup of Bir ( 2 ) is conjugate to a Borel subgroup of Jonq (Theorem 3.1); and finally two Borel subgroups of Jonq are conjugate in Jonq if and only if they are conjugate in Bir ( 2 ) (Lemma 7.9 and Theorem 12.1). Hence, the map sending the conjugacy class of a Borel subgroup B of Jonq to its conjugacy class in Bir ( 2 ) is a bijection from the set of conjugacy classes of Borel subgroups of Jonq to the set of conjugacy classes of Borel subgroups of Bir ( 2 ) .

The interplay between PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 and Jonq = PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) PGL 2 is more intricate: We now give an example of a Borel subgroup B of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 which is no longer a Borel subgroup of Jonq . To put it differently, B is conjugate in Jonq to a subgroup B of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 which is no longer a Borel subgroup of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 ! This kind of situation can of course not occur for linear algebraic groups: Let H be a closed subgroup of a linear algebraic group G and let B , B be two subgroups of H which are conjugate in G. Then B is a Borel subgroup of H if and only if B is a Borel subgroup of H (if B , B are closed, it is enough to note that they have the same dimension).

Example B.1.

The subgroups 𝕋 y ( y - 1 ) and 𝕋 y of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) are conjugate in Jonq since the curves x 2 = y ( y - 1 ) and x 2 = y both have genus 0. However, since the odd supports S odd ( y ( y - 1 ) ) and S odd ( y ) are respectively equal to { 0 , 1 } and { 0 , } , Proposition 10.11 asserts that 𝕋 y ( y - 1 ) is a Borel subgroup of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 but that 𝕋 y is not. In fact, the unique Borel subgroup of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 containing 𝕋 y is 𝕋 y 𝕋 1 , 2 ; see Theorem 12.1. This also shows that even if 𝕋 y ( y - 1 ) is a Borel subgroup of PGL 2 ( ( y ) ) Aff 1 , it is no longer a Borel subgroup of Jonq .

Acknowledgements

We warmly thank Jérémy Blanc for interesting discussions related to the subject of this paper. We also gratefully thank the referee for his very careful reading of the text and his detailed comments which really helped to improve the exposition.

References

[1] L. Bayle and A. Beauville, Birational involutions of 𝐏 2 , Asian J. Math. 4 (2000), 11–17. 10.4310/AJM.2000.v4.n1.a2Suche in Google Scholar

[2] A. Beauville, Finite subgroups of PGL 2 ( K ) , Vector bundles and complex geometry, Contemp. Math. 522, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2010), 23–29. 10.1090/conm/522/10289Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Berest, A. Eshmatov and F. Eshmatov, Dixmier groups and Borel subgroups, Adv. Math. 286 (2016), 387–429. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.09.012Suche in Google Scholar

[4] A. Białynicki-Birula, Remarks on the action of an algebraic torus on k n , Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 14 (1966), 177–181. Suche in Google Scholar

[5] J. Blanc, Elements and cyclic subgroups of finite order of the Cremona group, Comment. Math. Helv. 86 (2011), no. 2, 469–497. 10.4171/CMH/231Suche in Google Scholar

[6] J. Blanc and J.-P. Furter, Topologies and structures of the Cremona groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 178 (2013), no. 3, 1173–1198. 10.4007/annals.2013.178.3.8Suche in Google Scholar

[7] J. Blanc and J.-P. Furter, Length in the Cremona group, Ann. H. Lebesgue 2 (2019), 187–257. 10.5802/ahl.18Suche in Google Scholar

[8] A. Borel, Linear algebraic groups, 2nd ed., Grad. Texts in Math. 126, Springer, New York 1991. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0941-6Suche in Google Scholar

[9] D. Cerveau and J. Déserti, Centralisateurs dans le groupe de Jonquières, Michigan Math. J. 61 (2012), no. 4, 763–783. 10.1307/mmj/1353098512Suche in Google Scholar

[10] T. de Fernex, On planar Cremona maps of prime order, Nagoya Math. J. 174 (2004), 1–28. 10.1017/S0027763000008795Suche in Google Scholar

[11] M. Demazure, Sous-groupes algébriques de rang maximum du groupe de Cremona, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 3 (1970), 507–588. 10.24033/asens.1201Suche in Google Scholar

[12] J. Diller and C. Favre, Dynamics of bimeromorphic maps of surfaces, Amer. J. Math. 123 (2001), no. 6, 1135–1169. 10.1353/ajm.2001.0038Suche in Google Scholar

[13] H. M. Farkas and I. Kra, Riemann surfaces, 2nd ed., Grad. Texts in Math. 71, Springer, New York 1992. 10.1007/978-1-4612-2034-3Suche in Google Scholar

[14] J.-P. Furter and H. Kraft, On the geometry of automorphism groups of affine varieties, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04175. Suche in Google Scholar

[15] J.-P. Furter and P.-M. Poloni, On the maximality of the triangular subgroup, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 68 (2018), no. 1, 393–421. 10.5802/aif.3165Suche in Google Scholar

[16] R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry, Grad. Texts in Math. 52, Springer, New York 1977. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3849-0Suche in Google Scholar

[17] J. E. Humphreys, Linear algebraic groups, Grad. Texts in Math. 21, Springer, New York 1975. 10.1007/978-1-4684-9443-3Suche in Google Scholar

[18] D. Mumford, Abelian varieties, Tata Inst. Fundamental Res. Stud. Math. 5, Hindustan Book, New Delhi 2008. Suche in Google Scholar

[19] V. L. Popov, Tori in the Cremona groups (Russian), Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 77 (2013), no. 4, 103–134; translation in Izv. Math. 77 (2013), no. 4, 742–771. 10.1070/IM2013v077n04ABEH002659Suche in Google Scholar

[20] V. L. Popov, Borel subgroups of Cremona groups (Russian), Mat. Zametki 102 (2017), no. 1, 72–80; translation in Math. Notes 102 (2017), 60–67. 10.1134/S0001434617070070Suche in Google Scholar

[21] J.-P. Serre, Le groupe de Cremona et ses sous-groupes finis, Séminaire Bourbaki. Volume 2008/2009. Exposés 997–1011, Astérisque 332, Société Mathématique de France, Paris (2010), 75–100, Exp. No. 1000. Suche in Google Scholar

[22] H. Umemura, On the maximal connected algebraic subgroups of the Cremona group. I, Nagoya Math. J. 88 (1982), 213–246. 10.1017/S0027763000020183Suche in Google Scholar

[23] C. Urech, Subgroups of elliptic elements of the Cremona group, J. reine angew. Math. 770 (2021), 27–57. 10.1515/crelle-2020-0008Suche in Google Scholar

[24] B. A. F. Wehrfritz, Infinite linear groups. An account of the group-theoretic properties of infinite groups of matrices, Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3) 76, Springer, New York 1973. 10.1007/978-3-642-87081-1Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-10-02
Revised: 2022-09-15
Published Online: 2022-11-11
Published in Print: 2023-01-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2022-0065/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen