Development of an empirical model for microwave assisted CO2 stripping/solvent recovery
-
Shree Vidhya Ramamoorthy
Abstract
With global CO2 emissions continuing to rise, finding efficient and scalable carbon capture solutions is more important than ever. Among available technologies, post-combustion carbon capture (PCCC) using solvents like monoethanolamine (MEA), piperazine (PZ), and potassium carbonate (K2CO3) remains one of the most practical and widely adopted methods. Traditional regeneration methods, such as steam stripping, are often energy-intensive and limit process efficiency. This study explores the use of microwave (MW) heating as a promising alternative for solvent regeneration, aiming to reduce energy use and improve system performance. Experiments were designed using Taguchi’s L27 orthogonal array, testing the effects of input power, regeneration time, solvent load, and solvent type. Results showed that PZ had the highest stripping rate, while K2CO3 offered the best diffusivity. The stripping rate increased linearly with input power due to enhanced electromagnetic energy transfer. An optimum regeneration time of 15 min and solvent load of 40 g provided maximum stripping performance. An empirical model was developed to predict CO2 stripping efficiency, incorporating stripping rate, diffusivity, nominal input power, rich and lean carbon loading, density, viscosity, surface tension, initial, final and average temperatures, molecular weight of solvent and CO2, change in mass after experiment, regeneration time, initial and final pH considered to develop the model. The correlation matrix and dimensional analysis were employed to formulate dimensionless groups influencing stripping efficiency and least square method was utilized to develop the model. t-test as a statistical validation technique confirmed model’s reliability at 98.9 % accuracy and 95 % confidence level signifying excellent predictive capability.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar (SSN) Trust, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering (SSNCE), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: SR- Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Data curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization. AB- Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration, Supervision.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
1. CO2 Earth. Earth’s CO2 home page. CO2 Earth; n.d.. https://www.co2.earth/.Suche in Google Scholar
2. New IPCC report reconfirms the essential role of carbon management technologies in meeting midcentury climate goals, carbon capture coalit (2023). https://carboncapturecoalition.org/new-ipcc-report-reconfirms-the-essential-role-of-carbon-management-technologies-in-meeting-midcentury-climate-goals/.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Mathilde, F, Carl, G, Josephine, TK. CCUS projects around the world are reaching new milestones. IEA; 2025. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/ccus-projects-around-the-world-are-reaching-new-milestones [Accessed 8 May 2025].Suche in Google Scholar
4. Meng, F, Meng, Y, Ju, T, Han, S, Lin, L, Jiang, J. Research progress of aqueous amine solution for CO2 capture: a review. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 2022;168:28.10.1016/j.rser.2022.112902Suche in Google Scholar
5. Garcia, JA, Villen-Guzman, M, Rodriguez-Maroto, JM, Paz-Garcia, JM. Technical analysis of CO2 capture pathways and technologies. J Environ Chem Eng 2022;10:108470.10.1016/j.jece.2022.108470Suche in Google Scholar
6. Saeed, IM, Alaba, P, Mazari, SA, Basirun, WJ, Lee, VS, Sabzoi, N. Opportunities and challenges in the development of monoethanolamine and its blends for post-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2018;79:212.10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.11.002Suche in Google Scholar
7. Freeman, SA, Dugas, R, Van Wagener, DH, Nguyen, T, Rochelle, GT. Carbon dioxide capture with concentrated, aqueous piperazine. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010;4:119.10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.008Suche in Google Scholar
8. Rochelle, G, Chen, E, Freeman, S, Van Wagener, D, Xu, Q, Voice, A. Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;171:725–33.10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.011Suche in Google Scholar
9. Borhani, TNG, Azarpour, A, Akbari, V, Wan Alwi, SR, Manan, ZA. CO2 capture with potassium carbonate solutions: a state-of-the-art review. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2015;41:142.10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.026Suche in Google Scholar
10. Karali, D, Peloriadi, K, Margaritis, N, Grammelis, P. CO2 absorption using potassium carbonate as solvent†. Eng Proc 2022;31:39.10.3390/ASEC2022-13824Suche in Google Scholar
11. Balraj, A, Premalalitha, PP, Ramamoorthy, SV, Mayilvahanan, SA, Venkatesan, S, Annadurai, L, et al.. Experimental investigation of microwave-assisted regeneration of carbon-rich aqueous solutions. Chem Eng Process 2022;177:109000.10.1016/j.cep.2022.109000Suche in Google Scholar
12. Vasudev, H, Singh, G, Bansal, A, Vardhan, S, Thakur, L. Microwave heating and its applications in surface engineering: a review. Mater Res Express 2019;6:102001.10.1088/2053-1591/ab3674Suche in Google Scholar
13. McGurk, SJ, Martín, CF, Brandani, S, Sweatman, MB, Fan, X. Microwave swing regeneration of aqueous monoethanolamine for post-combustion CO2 capture. Appl Energy 2017;192:126–33.10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.012Suche in Google Scholar
14. Palaian Premalalitha, P, Balraj, A. Low-temperature dielectric heating-assisted CO2 stripping/solvent regeneration of aqueous carbon-rich monoethanolamine, piperazine, and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol solvents. Ind Eng Chem Res 2024;63:1975.10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03671Suche in Google Scholar
15. Webley, PA, Zhang, J. Microwave assisted vacuum regeneration for CO2 capture from wet flue gas. Adsorption 2014;20:201–10.10.1007/s10450-013-9563-ySuche in Google Scholar
16. Andre, T. Monoethanolamine (MEA): driving cutting-edge carbon capture & green chemistry. Alliance Chem. 2025. https://alliancechemical.com/blogs/articles/monoethanolamine-mea-driving-cutting-edge-carbon-capture-amp-green-chemistry#high-tech-applications.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Hajj, A, Pré, P, Curet, S. Dielectric dispersion of 30% aqueous monoethanolamine solution loaded with CO2 at microwave frequencies. J Mol Liq 2024;404:124819.10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124819Suche in Google Scholar
18. Zaabout, A, Romano, MC, Cloete, S, Giuffrida, A, Morud, J, Chiesa, P, et al.. A novel swing adsorption reactor cluster (SARC) for cost effective post-combustion CO2 capture: a thermodynamic assessment. Energy Procedia 2017;114:2488–96.10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1404Suche in Google Scholar
19. Balraj, A, Sekaran, APC, Ramamurthy, N, Babarao, R, Nagarajan, KK, Mayilvahanan, SA. Systematic review on sono-assisted CO2 stripping, solvent recovery and energy demand aspects in solvent-based post-combustion carbon dioxide capture process. Chem Eng Process 2022;170:108723.10.1016/j.cep.2021.108723Suche in Google Scholar
20. Nagarajan, KK, Balraj, A, Nagarajan, R, Babarao, R. Ultra-low temperature sono-assisted CO2 stripping/carbon-rich solvent regeneration using different ultrasonic frequencies. Energy Sources, Part A 2023;45:10408.10.1080/15567036.2023.2245779Suche in Google Scholar
21. Khalili, F, Henni, A, East, ALL. pKa values of some piperazines at (298, 303, 313, and 323) K. J Chem Eng Data 2009;54:2914.10.1021/je900005cSuche in Google Scholar
22. Chen, PC, Jhuang, JH, Wu, TW, Yang, CY, Wang, KY, Chen, CM. Capture of CO2 using mixed amines and solvent regeneration in a lab-scale continuous bubble-column scrubber. Appl Sci 2023;13:7321.10.3390/app13127321Suche in Google Scholar
23. Nasiman, T, Kanoh, H. CO2 capture by a K2CO3-carbon composite under moist conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res 2020;59:3405.10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05498Suche in Google Scholar
24. Rehemituli, R, Zhang, Z, Yang, X, Yang, F, Liu, Y, Hou, J. Research on CO2 desorption using microwave-assisted novel blended alkanolamine formulations. Processes 2024;12:2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112547.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Bougie, F, Fan, X. Analysis of the regeneration of monoethanolamine aqueous solutions by microwave irradiation. Energy Procedia 2017;142:3661–6.10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.259Suche in Google Scholar
26. Li, Y, Gao, J, Li, J, Li, Y, Bernards, MT, Tao, M, et al.. Screening and performance evaluation of triethylenetetramine nonaqueous solutions for CO2 capture with microwave regeneration. Energy Fuels 2020;34:11270–81.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02006Suche in Google Scholar
27. Kiani, A, Jiang, K, Feron, P. Techno-economic assessment for CO2 capture from air using a conventional liquid-based absorption process. Front Energy Res 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00092.Suche in Google Scholar
28. Bui, M, Tait, P, Lucquiaud, M, Mac Dowell, N. Dynamic operation and modelling of amine-based CO2 capture at pilot scale. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2018;79:134.10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.08.016Suche in Google Scholar
29. Wu, Y, Wu, F, Hu, G, Mirza, NR, Stevens, GW, Mumford, KA. Modelling of a post-combustion carbon dioxide capture absorber using potassium carbonate solvent in aspen custom modeller. Chin J Chem Eng 2018;26:2327.10.1016/j.cjche.2018.06.005Suche in Google Scholar
30. Tsay, C, Pattison, RC, Zhang, Y, Rochelle, GT, Baldea, M. Rate-based modeling and economic optimization of next-generation amine-based carbon capture plants. Appl Energy 2019;252:113379.10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113379Suche in Google Scholar
31. Ying, J, Eimer, DA, Brakstad, F, Haugen, HA. Ultrasound intensified CO2 desorption from pressurized loaded monoethanolamine solutions. I. Parameters investigation and modelling. Energy 2018;163:168.10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.122Suche in Google Scholar
32. Zareiekordshouli, F, Lashanizadehgan, A, Darvishi, P. Study on the use of an imidazolium-based acetate ionic liquid for CO2 capture from flue gas in absorber/stripper packed columns: experimental and modeling. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2018;70:178.10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.002Suche in Google Scholar
33. Tavakoli, A, Rahimi, K, Saghandali, F, Scott, J, Lovell, E. Nanofluid preparation, stability and performance for CO2 absorption and desorption enhancement: a review. J Environ Manage 2022;313:114955.10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114955Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
34. Ghasem, N. Modeling and simulation of the simultaneous absorption/stripping of CO2 with potassium glycinate solution in membrane contactor. Membranes 2020;10:72.10.3390/membranes10040072Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
35. Chen, PC, Lai, YL. Optimization in the stripping process of CO2 gas using mixed amines. Energies 2019;12:2202.10.3390/en12112202Suche in Google Scholar
36. Suresh Babu, A, Rochelle, GT. Energy use of piperazine with the advanced stripper from pilot plant testing. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2022;113:103531.10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103531Suche in Google Scholar
37. Agbonghae, EO, Hughes, KJ, Ingham, DB, Ma, L, Pourkashanian, M. A semi-empirical model for estimating the heat capacity of aqueous solutions of alkanolamines for CO2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53:829110.1021/ie5006178Suche in Google Scholar
38. O’Connor, JP. Modeling of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations as a function of fossil-fuel and land-use change CO2 emissions coupled with oceanic and terrestrial sequestration. Climate 2020;8:61.10.3390/cli8050061Suche in Google Scholar
39. Oexmann, J, Hasenbein, C, Kather, A. Semi-empirical model for the direct simulation of power plant with integrated post-combustion CO2 capture processes by wet chemical absorption. Energy Procedia 2011;4:1276.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.184Suche in Google Scholar
40. Liu, J, Wang, S, Qi, G, Zhao, B, Chen, C. Kinetics and mass transfer of carbon dioxide absorption into aqueous ammonia. Energy Procedia 2011;4:525.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.084Suche in Google Scholar
41. Nilavuckkarasi, RK, Muthumari, P, Ambedkar, B, Moniha, M. Carbon-rich solvent regeneration in solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture process (PCCC): process intensification by megasonics. Chem Eng Process 2020;151:107913.10.1016/j.cep.2020.107913Suche in Google Scholar
42. Nandhini, V, Suchitra, B, Surendiran, R, Dhanalakshmi, J, Ambedkar, B. Feasibilites of using power ultrasound and microwave treatment in reducing CO2 capture energy demand. Int J Adv Technol Eng Sci 2015;3:711–6.Suche in Google Scholar
43. Mazari, SA, Ali, BS, Jan, BM, Saeed, IM. Thermal degradation of piperazine and diethanolamine blend for CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2016;47:1.10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.01.022Suche in Google Scholar
44. Barbur, VA, Montgomery, DC, Peck, EA. Introduction to linear regression analysis. Statistician 1994;43:339.10.2307/2348362Suche in Google Scholar
45. Iguyon, I, Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 2003;3:1157.Suche in Google Scholar
46. Jollife, IT, Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans R Soc A 2016;374:20150202.10.1098/rsta.2015.0202Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
