Rethinking agreement: Cognition-to-form mapping

References

Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos. 2009. The linguistics and psycholinguistics of agreement: A tutorial overview. Lingua 119. 389–424.10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.005Suche in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2017. Tariana, an Arawak language from north-west Amazonia. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 713–734. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.41Suche in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 1988. A situated theory of agreement. Stanford: Stanford University Ph.D. dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 1991. The Agreement Hierarchy and grammatical theory. In Laurel Sutton, Christopher Johnson & Ruth Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Structure, 30–40. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California.10.3765/bls.v17i0.1629Suche in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 1999. Agreement as a discourse phenomenon. Folia Linguistica XXXIII/2. 187–201.10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.187Suche in Google Scholar

Belošapkova, Vera A. (ed.). 2003. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk [Modern Russian]. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Suche in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description vol. 3 Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618437.003Suche in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar & Fernando Zúñiga. 2017. The ‘word’ in polysynthetic languages: Phonological and syntactic challenges. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 158–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.52Suche in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn & Erica L. Middleton. 2011. Reaching agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 1033–1069.10.1007/s11049-011-9148-ySuche in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn & Carol A. Miller. 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 23. 45–93.10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7Suche in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera, Lauren A. Schmidt & Webb Phillips. 2003. Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition, 61–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Braun, Friederike & Geoffrey Haig. 2010. When are German ‘girls’ feminine? How the semantics of age influences the grammar of gender agreement. In Markus Bieswanger, Heiko Motschenbacher & Susanne Mühleisen (eds.), Language in its socio-cultural context: New explorations in gendered, global and media uses, 69–84. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Brehm, Laurel & Kathryn Bock. 2017. Referential and lexical forces in number agreement. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32(2). 129–146. doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1234060.Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Sam Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language 63(4). 741–782.10.2307/415717Suche in Google Scholar

Bulgakov, Mikhail. 1967. The Master and Margarita. Translated from the Russian by Michael Glenny. London: Collins and Harvill Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris (ed.). 2014. Cross-linguistic studies of imposters and pronominal agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199336852.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 1979. The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15. 203–224.10.1017/S0022226700016352Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166119Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164344Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cornish, Francis. 1999. Anaphora, discourse, and understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2013. Agreement as anaphora, anaphora as coreference. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 95–118. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110331127.95Suche in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.71Suche in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010–2012. Basic linguistic theory. vols 1–3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2006. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: Issues in grammar writing, 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Eberhard, Kathleen M., J. Cooper Cutting & J. Kathryn Bock. 2005. Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review 112. 531–559.10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.531Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2017. Polysynthesis in Northern Australia. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 312–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fleischer, Jürg, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer. 2015. Agreement from a diachronic perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110399967Suche in Google Scholar

Foley, William A. 2017. Polysynthesis in New Guinea. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 336–362. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.20Suche in Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.). 2017. The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara. 2010. Introduction. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.93.01foxSuche in Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1985. Ergativity, number and agreement. In Mary Niepokuj, Mary Van Clay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 96–106. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California.10.3765/bls.v11i0.1891Suche in Google Scholar

Franck, Julie, Gabriella Vigliocco & Janet Nicol. 2002. Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes 17. 371–404.10.1080/01690960143000254Suche in Google Scholar

Gillespie, Maureen & Neal J. Pearlmutter. 2011. Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production. Cognition 118(3). 377–397.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, T. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, T. 2017a. Is polysynthesis a valid theoretical notion? The diachrony of complex verbs in Ute. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 392–407. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.22Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, T. 2017b. The story of zero. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.204Suche in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey & Ergin Öpengin. 2015. Gender in Kurdish: Structural and socio-cultural dimensions. In Marlis Hellinger & Heiko Motschenbacher (eds.), Gender across languages, Vol IV, 247–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/impact.36.10haiSuche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Haskell, Todd R., Robert Thornton & Maryellen C. MacDonald. 2010. Experience and grammatical agreement: Statistical learning shapes number agreement production. Cognition 114. 151–164.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.017Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110331127.197Suche in Google Scholar

Hellinger, Marlis & Bußmann Hadumod. 2014. Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. In Marlis Hellinger & Heiko Motschenbacher (eds.), Gender across languages, Vol. 4, 1–26. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/impact.36.01helSuche in Google Scholar

Iomdin, Leonid L. 1990. Avtomatičeskaja obrabotka teksta na estestvennom jazyke: Model’ soglasovanija [Automatic natural language processing: A model of agreement]. Moscow: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Keown, Anne Stepan. 2004. Metaphorical motivations for politeness strategies: Linguistic evidence from Russian, Polish, and Czech. UNC Chapel Hill dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1992 [1977]. O sootnošenii ponjatija sintaksičeskogo podčinenija s ponjatijami soglasovanija, upravlenija i primykanija [On the relations between the notion of syntactic subordination with the notions of agreement, government, and adjunction]. In A. E. Kibrik ed., Očerki po obščim i prikladnym voprosam jazykoznanija, 102–123. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU.Suche in Google Scholar

Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1994. Archi. In Rieks Smeets (ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus vol. IV, part 2, 297–365. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1997. Beyond subject and object: Toward a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 1(3). 279–346.10.1515/lity.1997.1.3.279Suche in Google Scholar

Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Konošenko, Marija B. 2015. Lično-čislovoe soglasovanie v jazykax mande: Vnutrigenetičeskaja tipologija [Person and number agreement in Mande languages: An intragenetic typology]. Moscow: IJaz RAN Cand.Sc. dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Koval, Antonina I. 2006. Konflikt uzusa i kanona: K vorposu ob obščej literaturnoj norme u malijskix ful’be [Conflict of usage and canon. The problem of literary norm among the Fulɓe of Mali]. In V. Ja. Porxomovskij & N. N. Semenjuk ed., Sbornik statej po teorii i istorii literaturnyx jazykov, 287–311. Moscow: Editorial URSS.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lehečková, Helena. 2003. Slavonic versus Finno-Ugric languages: On missing categories in grammar and cognition. Glossos 4. https://slaviccenters.duke.edu/sites/slaviccenters.duke.edu/files/media_items_files/4leheckova.original.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In Hansjakob Seiler & Franz J. Stachowiak (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhang in Enzelsprachen, 201–267. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J.M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lorimor, Heidi, Kathryn Bock, Ekaterina Zalkind, Alina Sheyman & Robert Beard. 2008. Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(6). 769–799.10.1080/01690960701774182Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1975. Deixis as the source of reference. In Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language, 61–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511897696.007Suche in Google Scholar

Lyutikova, Еkaterina А. 2015. Soglasovanie, priznaki i struktura imennoj gruppy v russkom jazyke [Agreement, features, and noun phrase structure in Russian]. Russkij jazyk v naucnom osvešcenii 2(30). 44–74.Suche in Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor A. 1993. Soglasovanie, upravlenie, kongruèntnost’ [Agreement, government, congruence]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1993(3). 16–58.Suche in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1986. Disagreement: The case of pronominal affixes and nouns. In Deborah Tannen & James A. Alatis (eds.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1985. Languages and Linguistics: The Interdependence of Theory, Data, and Application, 50–66. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1988. Agreement and markedness. In Michael Barlow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural languages: Approaches, theories, descriptions, 89–106. Stanford: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter, Rom Harré, Anthony Holiday & Michael Freyne. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Myachykov, Andriy & Michael I. Posner. 2005. Attention in language. In Laurent Itti, Geraint Rees & John K. Tsotsos (eds.), Neurobiology of attention, 324–329. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012375731-9/50057-4Suche in Google Scholar

Paul, Hermann. 1891 [1880]. Principles of the history of language. London: Longman, Greens, and Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Podlesskaya, Vera I. 2010. Parameters for typological variation of placeholders. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders, 11–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.93.02podSuche in Google Scholar

Podlesskaya, Vera I. & Andrej A. Kibrik. 2009. Rečevye sboi i zatrudnenija [Speech disfluencies]. In Andrej A. Kibrik & Vera I. Podlesskaya (eds.), Rasskazy o snovidenijax: Korpusnoe issledovanie ustnogo russkogo diskursa, 177–218. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Suche in Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Proxorova, A. S. 2012. Naimenovanija lic ženskogo pola po professional’noj prinadležnosti na rubeže XX–XXI vekov [Female person names in accordance with professional affiliation at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries]. Prepodavatel’ XXI Vek 3. 292–295.Suche in Google Scholar

Riveiro Outeiral, Sara María & Juan Carlos Acuña-Fariña. 2012. Agreement processes in English and Spanish: A completion study. Functions of Language 19(1). 58–88.10.1075/fol.19.1.03rivSuche in Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. L. & Alan S. Brown. 2014. Tip-of-the-tongue states and related phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139547383Suche in Google Scholar

Sekerina, Irina A. 2017. Slavic Psycholinguistics in the 21st Century. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 25(2). 465–489.10.1353/jsl.2017.0018Suche in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 1998. Variation in major constituent order: A global and a European perspective. In Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, 475–551. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110812206.475Suche in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812729Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan. 1996. From “Thought and language” to “Thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Steele, Susan. 1978. Word order variation: A typological study. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language IV: Syntax, 585–623. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sumbatova, Nina R. & Yurij A. Lander. 2014. Darginskij govor selenija Tanty: Grammatičeskij očerk. Voprosy sintaksisa [The Tanty variety of Dargwa: A grammatical sketch. Syntactic issues]. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Suche in Google Scholar

Testelets, Yakov G. 2001. Vvedenie v obščij sintaksis [Introduction to general syntax]. Moscow: RGGU.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomlin, Russell S. 1995. Focal attention, voice and word order: An experimental cross-linguistic study. In Pamela Downing & Michael Noonan (eds.), Word order in discourse, 517–554. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.30.18tomSuche in Google Scholar

Urjupina, Olga M. 2001. Osobennosti glagol’nogo soglasovanija po čislu v okeanijskix jazykax [Peculiarities of number verb agreement in Oceanic languages]. In Vladimir A. Plungian (ed.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki, 228–261. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Suche in Google Scholar

Urmančieva, Anna Ju. 2001. Ličnoe soglasovanie glagola: Tak li vsë prosto? [Person agreement on the verb: Are things that simple?]. In Vladimir A. Plungian (ed.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki, 209–227. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Suche in Google Scholar

Vajda, Edward. 2017. Patterns of innovation and retention in templatic polysynthesis. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 363–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.21Suche in Google Scholar

Vigliocco, Gabriella & Julie Franck. 1999. When sex and syntax go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 40. 455–478.10.1006/jmla.1998.2624Suche in Google Scholar

Wechsler, Stephen. 2011. Mixed agreement, the person feature, and the Index/Concord distinction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(4). 999–1031.10.1007/s11049-011-9149-xSuche in Google Scholar

Yanovich, Igor S. & Olga V. Fedorova. 2006. Analiz rečevyx ošibok pri predikativnom soglasovanii v russkom jazyke: èffekt roda glavnogo imeni [An analysis of speech errors in Russian predicate agreement: The effect of head noun gender]. In Natalija I. Laufer, Aleksandr S. Narin’jani & Vladimir P. Selegej (eds.), Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue 2006” (Bekasovo, May 31 – June 4, 2006), 602–606. Moscow: RGGU.Suche in Google Scholar

Yudina, Maria, Olga Fedorova & Igor Yanovich. 2007. Relative clause attachment in Russian: The role of conceptual and grammatical gender. In Peter Kosta & Lilia Schurcks (eds.), Linguistic investigations into formal description of Slavic languages, 91–100. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar